← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 203 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 205

Section 18 18. Souls vary in worth; and the difference is due, among other causes, to an almost initial inequality; it is in reason that, standing to the Reason-Principle, as parts, they should be unequal by the fact of becoming separate. We must also remember that every Soul has its second grade and its third, and that, therefore, its expression may take any one of three main forms. But this point must be dealt with here again: the matter requires all possible elucidation. We may perhaps think of actors having the right to add something to the poet's words: the drama as it stands is not perfectly filled in, and they are to supply where the Author has left blank spaces here and there; the actors are to be something else as well; they become parts of the poet, who on his side has a foreknowledge of the word they will add, and so is able to bind into one story what the actors bring in and what is to follow. For, in the All, the sequences, including what follows upon wickedness, become Reason-Principles, and therefore in right reason. Thus: from adultery and the violation of prisoners the process of nature will produce fine children, to grow, perhaps, into fine men; and where wicked violence has destroyed cities, other and nobler cities may rise in their place. But does not this make it absurd to introduce Souls as responsible causes, some acting for good and some for evil? If we thus exonerate the Reason-Principle from any part in wickedness do we not also cancel its credit for the good? Why not simply take the doings of these actors for representative parts of the Reason-Principle as the doings of stage-actors are representative parts of the stage-drama? Why not admit that the Reason-Principle itself includes evil action as much as good action, and inspires the precise conduct of all its representatives? Would not this be all the more Plausible in that the universal drama is the completer creation and that the Reason-Principle is the source of all that exists? But this raises the question: "What motive could lead the Logos to produce evil?" The explanation, also, would take away all power in the Universe from Souls, even those nearest to the divine; they would all be mere parts of a Reason-Principle. And, further- unless all Reason-Principles are Souls- why should some be souls and others exclusively Reason-Principles when the All is itself a Soul?
Themes
Anamnesissoteriology

Platonic recollection: knowledge as the soul's recovery of what it knew before birth, with learning as remembering rather than acquisition.

Actors bring to the play what they were before it was ever staged, implying pre-existence and prior knowledge.

All passages →
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The Soul attunes itself to the whole Principle of the piece, suggesting a structural alignment between part and whole.

All passages →
Cosmic Sympathycosmology

The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.

The text states that all are members of this Principle, implying a binding connection between parts of the cosmos.

All passages →
Microcosm Macrocosmcosmology

The human being as a small-scale image of the entire cosmos; the body, soul, and intellect mirroring the structure of the heavens and the divine — distinct from correspondence in that it makes the human the privileged mirror.

The Soul adapts itself to the fortunes assigned within the drama of the Universe, reflecting the whole Principle in its individual part.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

Good and bad are presented as opposed movements within one artistic plan where the opposition lies in the merit of the design.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

Actors bring their own quality to the play, suggesting that one's role is determined by inherent personal excellence or defect.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The world of sense is described as less a unity than the Reason-Principle, implying a state of deficiency or distance.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

Partial members are urged towards fullness of life and unification, indicating an upward movement toward the divine.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

All are members of the Reason-Principle, and the world's multiplicity is contrasted with the unity of its source.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

[auto] The text describes a Poet/Reason-Principle that actively assigns roles and orders the unfolding of human lives under a rational plan.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The Reason-Principle is contrasted with the sense world as being more unified and less multiplicitous.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The text describes a flow from the unified Reason-Principle to the less unified, multiplicitous world of sense.

All passages →
Eschatological Judgmentsoteriology

Final, collective cosmic judgment as an event in which the wicked are sentenced and the cosmos restored; distinct from psychopomp_journey (individual passage at death) and emphasising verdict where Zoroastrian frashokereti emphasises restoration.

[auto] The passage concludes that souls receive punishment and reward at the end based on their conduct within the assigned role.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

[auto] The passage explicitly centers on the 'Reason-Principle' as the ordering force and source of unity for the world of sense.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The text emphasizes a 'warmer desire for unification' and the urge towards fullness of life.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

[auto] Partial members are described as straining towards their completing principle and desiring unification.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn XXXI. PALLAS (part 2)
Some are the causes of conversion to inferiors, and of collecting the multitude of progressive natures to their proper principles: while others promote their progression and procreation, emanating from principles, as their source. Some sup…”
Both passages discuss the role of divine principles or souls in the universe, exploring how they interact with each other and with lesser beings or forces. They both delve into the idea of contrariety and the apparent conflicts within the divine order, though from different mystical traditions.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 2: The Serapeum|Section 1d
Not only, then, is God not understood by all, but both unto the gods and some of the men they out of ignorance do give the name of Good, though they can never either be or become Good. For they are very different from God, while Good can n…”
Both passages explore the nature of divine principles and their relationship to human existence and morality. They discuss the role of a higher Reason-Principle or Good in governing the universe and human actions, though from different philosophical and religious perspectives.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1d
There is reason in supposing that the finest natures, when under alien conditions, receive more injury than the inferior, because the contrast is greater. Certainly. And may we not say, Adeimantus, that the most gifted minds, when they ar…”
Both passages discuss the influence of external factors on the nature and actions of individuals, particularly how higher or lower natures are affected differently by their environments. They also explore the role of reason or divine principles in guiding or determining human behavior.