← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 102 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter XIV (part 1)

p. 156 CHAPTER XIV The voices of stones. The wall of a church and the wall of a prison. The mast of a ship and a gallows. The shadow of a hangman and of an ascetic. The soul of a hangman and of an ascetic. The different combinations of known phenomena in higher space. The relationship of phenomena which appear unrelated, and the difference between phenomena which appear similar. How shall we approach the noumenal world? The understanding of things outside the categories of space and time. The reality of many "figures of speech." The occult understanding of energy. The letter of a Hindu occultist. Art as the knowledge of the noumenal world. What we see and what we do not see. Plato's dialogue about the cavern. IT seems to us that we see something and understand something. But in reality all that proceeds around us we sense only very confusedly, just as a snail senses confusedly the sunlight, the darkness, and the rain. Sometimes in things we sense confusedly their difference in function, i.e., their real difference. On one occasion I was crossing the Neva with one of my friends, A, with whom I happened to have had many conversations upon the themes touched on in this book. We had been talking, but both fell silent as we approached the fortress, gazing up at its walls and making probably the same reflection. "Right there are also factory chimneys!" said A. Behind the walls of the fortress indeed appeared some brick chimneys blackened by smoke. On his saying this, I too sensed the difference between the chimneys and the prison walls with unusual clearness and like an electric shock. I realized the difference between the very bricks themselves , and it seemed to me that A realized this difference also. Later in conversation with A, I recalled this episode, and he told me that not only then, but always , he sensed these differences and was deeply convinced of their reality. "Positivism assures itself that a stone is a stone and nothing more," he said, "but any p. 157 simple woman or child knows perfectly that a stone from the wall of a church and one from a prison wall are different things." It seems to me also, that in considering a given phenomenon in connection with all the chains of sequences of which it is a link, we shall see that the subjective sensation of the difference between two physically similar objects—which we are accustomed to think of only as poetic expression, metaphor , and the reality of which we deny— is entirely real ; we shall see that these objects are really different , just as different as the candle and the coin which appear as similar circles (moving lines) in the two-dimensional world of the plane-man. We shall see that things of the same material constitution but different in their functions are really different , and that this difference goes so deep as to make different the very material which is physically the same. There are differences in stone, in wood, in iron, in paper, which no chemistry will ever detect: but these differences exist, and there are men who feel and understand them. The mast of a ship, a gallows, a crucifix at a cross-roads on the steppes—these may be made of the same kind of wood, but in reality they are different objects made of different material . That which we see, touch, investigate, is nothing more than "the circles on the plane" made by the coin and the candle. They are only the shadows of real things, the substance of which is contained in their function . The shadow of a sailor, of a hangman, and of an ascetic may be quite similar—it is impossible to distinguish them by their shadows, just as it is impossible to find any difference between the wood of a mast, of a gallows and of a cross by chemical analysis. But they are different men and different objects—their shadows only are equal and similar.
Themes
Anamnesissoteriology

Platonic recollection: knowledge as the soul's recovery of what it knew before birth, with learning as remembering rather than acquisition.

The passage explicitly references 'Plato's dialogue about the cavern,' which is foundational to the theory of recollection.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

It mentions the need for 'understanding of things outside the categories of space and time,' implying a negation of standard conceptual frameworks.

All passages →
Childlike Innocenceanthropology

The infant or child as symbol of the unfallen, undivided spiritual state; return to primordial simplicity.

The author notes that a 'simple woman or child knows perfectly' what positivism denies, valuing intuitive knowledge over intellectual analysis.

All passages →
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The text argues that physical objects are 'shadows of real things' and that function determines substance, aligning with the axiom that visible phenomena reflect invisible realities.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

It emphasizes 'occult understanding' and the ability of certain men to 'feel and understand' differences that positivism denies, prioritizing direct experience over analysis.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage presents the paradox that physically identical objects (wood) are ontologically different based on function, challenging ordinary logic.

All passages →
Mechanical Humanityanthropology

Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.

[auto] The passage describes ordinary perception as confused ('like a snail') and contrasts it with higher understanding, directly reflecting Ouspensky's concept of waking sleep.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 7 (part 13)
154:1 This is the difference between life in the terrestrial and life in the celestial states of nature, that the former is differentiated into forms, each of which loves to live in the consciousness of its own illusive self— i.e. , in a s…”
Both passages explore the deeper, often overlooked differences between seemingly similar objects or states, emphasizing the importance of understanding the noumenal or spiritual reality behind the physical. They both highlight the limitations of materialistic or superficial understanding and the need for a higher, more intuitive perception.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 8 (part 6)
1.) "The terrestrial consciousness corrupted the celestial one, and the former became the Turba of the latter. Likewise, the Fiat made the earth and stones out of the eternal essentiality." ( Menschwerdung , i. 9.) "But in the earth we fi…”
Both passages explore the deeper, often hidden differences between seemingly similar objects or phenomena, emphasizing that their true nature is tied to their function and spiritual significance. They both suggest that the material world is a shadow of a deeper reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 479
Section 1 1. It is a principle with us that one who has attained to the vision of the Intellectual Beauty and grasped the beauty of the Authentic Intellect will be able also to come to understand the Father and Transcendent of that Divine B…”
Both passages explore the idea that objects with similar physical properties can have fundamentally different essences or functions, emphasizing the importance of understanding the deeper, noumenal aspects of reality beyond mere appearances. They both highlight the limitations of sensory perception and the need for a higher, more intuitive understanding.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1a
BOOK VII SOCRATES - GLAUCON AND now, I said, let me show in a figure how far our nature is enlightened or unenlightened:--Behold! human beings living in a underground den, which has a mouth open towards the light and reaching all along the…”
Both passages explore the theme of perception and reality, using metaphors to illustrate the limited understanding of humans. Ouspensky discusses the noumenal world and the differences in seemingly similar objects, while Plato's Allegory of the Cave describes prisoners who mistake shadows for reality. Both highlight the need to look beyond immediate perceptions to understand deeper truths.