← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 148 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter V

You say then, in your epistle, “ that the discovery of the lord or lords of the geniture, if there are more than one in a nativity, can scarcely be obtained, and by astrologers themselves is confessed to be unattainable; and yet they say that the peculiar dæmon is from thence to be known .” But how can astrologers confess that the knowledge of the lord of the geniture is not to be obtained by them, when they deliver clear methods for the discovery of it, and teach us rules by which we may discover the doubts; some, indeed, giving us five, [146] others more and others less than five rules? Omitting this, however, let us direct our attention to a thing of greater consequence, viz. the accidents pertaining 320 to both these. For if it is possible to discover the lord of the geniture, the dæmon imparted by him will be known; but if this knowledge is unattainable, we shall be ignorant of the lord of the geniture according to this hypothesis, and yet, nevertheless, he will have an existence, and also the dæmon imparted by him. What therefore hinders, but that the discovery of him may be difficult through prediction from the nativity, and yet through sacred divination, or theurgy, there may be a great abundance of scientific knowledge on this subject? In short, the dæmon is not alone imparted by the lord of the geniture, but there are many other principles of it more universal [147] than this. And farther still, a method of this kind introduces a certain artificial and human disquisition concerning the peculiar dæmon. Hence, in these doubts of yours there is nothing sane. 321
Themes
Cosmic Sympathycosmology

The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.

The passage argues that astrologers can discover the lord of the geniture through prediction from the nativity, implying a connection between celestial configurations and human fate.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The text explicitly states that knowledge of the lord of the geniture is 'unattainable' by astrologers despite their methods, emphasizing divine concealment.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage contrasts astrological prediction with 'sacred divination' and 'theurgy' as superior paths to attain true knowledge of the lord and dæmon.

All passages →
Theurgypraxis

Iamblichean ritual practice that engages the gods directly through consecrated material symbols and actions, on the premise that divine power descends into properly prepared matter — distinct from philosophical contemplation alone.

The passage explicitly contrasts astrological prediction with 'sacred divination' and 'theurgy' as superior methods for attaining knowledge of the lord of the geniture.

All passages →
Related passages · 1 parallel
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic II: The Ritual (Éliphas Lévi)|17. The Writing Of The Starse
Birth of Benjamin. Day of preference and tenderness. 24. Influence of Jupiter. Birth of Japhet. 25. Influence of Mercury. Tenth plague of Egypt. 26. Influence of Mars. Deliverance of the Israelites and passage of the Red Sea. 27.…”
Both passages discuss the concept of celestial influences on human life and the methods to determine these influences. Passage A focuses on the lord of the geniture and the dæmon imparted by it, while Passage B describes onomantic astrology and the influence of stars on a person's life. Both explore the intersection of divine or celestial forces with human destiny, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.