← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 88 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter VII

Moreover, it is necessary to add the causes whence evils [90] sometimes arise, and to show how many and of what kind they are. For the form of them is not simple; but, being various, is the leader of the generation of various evils. For if what we a little before said, concerning images and evil dæmons, who assume the appearance of Gods and good dæmons, is true, an abundant evil-producing tribe, about which a 214 contrariety of this kind usually happens, will from hence appear to flow. For an evil dæmon requires that his worshipper should be just, because he assumes the appearance of one belonging to the divine genus; but he is subservient to what is unjust, because he is depraved. The same thing, likewise, that is said of good and evil may be asserted of the true and the false. As, therefore, in divinations we attribute true predictions to the Gods alone, but when we detect any falsehood in predictions we refer this to another genus of cause, viz. that of dæmons; thus, also, in things just and unjust, the beautiful and the just are to be alone ascribed to Gods and good dæmons; but such dæmons as are naturally depraved, perpetrate what is unjust and base. And that, indeed, which consents and accords with itself, and always subsists with invariable sameness, pertains to more excellent natures; but that which is hostile to itself, which is discordant, and never the same, is the peculiarity in the most eminent degree of dæmoniacal dissension, about which it is not at all wonderful that things of an opposing nature should subsist; but perhaps the very contrary, that this should not be the case, would be more wonderful. 215
Themes
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The passage centrally argues that reality is structured by opposing natures such as true/false, just/unjust, and Gods/dæmons.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

Evil dæmons are described as hiding their true nature behind the appearances of Gods and good dæmons.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The text describes evil dæmons as 'depraved' and discordant, implying they lack the perfection of true natures.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The distinction between Gods and dæmons in divination implies an esoteric knowledge reserved for discernment.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text presents the paradox that evil dæmons require worshipers to be just while being subservient to what is unjust.

All passages →
Ritual Puritypraxis

The maintenance of a state of cleanliness—physical, moral, or spiritual—required for encounter with the divine.

The passage establishes a requirement for the worshipper to be 'just' in relation to evil dæmons.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1v
cannot be free from pain, nor without a feeling of ill, since there would be something causing Him trouble, yea, all things must in that case be in a state of disorder and perpetual strife; whereas the Good imparts a principle of harmony to…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil and its relationship to the divine. They agree that evil does not originate from God or the divine, and explore how evil manifests in different beings, such as angels or dæmons.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1x
Hence if they are always in the same condition, they are not evil; for to remain always the same is a property of the Good. But if they are not always evil, then they are not evil by their natural constitution, but only through a lack of a…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil as a lack or deficiency of good qualities, rather than an inherent substance. They also explore how evil entities (devils or dæmons) are not evil by their natural constitution but through a failure to exercise their proper virtues.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1{
127 There remains but one alternative: Evil is a weakness and deficiency of Good. 31. Good things have all one cause. If evil is opposed to the Good, then hath evil many causes. The efficient causes of evil results, however, are not any…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil and its relationship to good, exploring the idea that evil is not a substantial entity but rather a deficiency or corruption of good. They both delve into the causes and manifestations of evil, though from different philosophical and mystical perspectives.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn XXXI. PALLAS (part 2)
Some are the causes of conversion to inferiors, and of collecting the multitude of progressive natures to their proper principles: while others promote their progression and procreation, emanating from principles, as their source. Some sup…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine beings and their relationship to evil or contrariety. They explore how divine and demonic entities interact with justice and injustice, truth and falsehood, and the causes of various evils or conflicts, showing a conceptual parallel in their mystical traditions.