Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 21 of 39 · tr. C.E. Rolt
Chapter 4, Section 1u
For things of the same kind cannot 333 333 Exuberant vitality is per se a good thing and the more exuberant the better, though, like all good things, it is dangerous, and unless properly directed is disastrous.
be wholly contradictory to one another in the same respects.
334 334 If good and evil are both existent, they are, to that extent, both of the same kind; which is impossible.
Hence evil is Non-Existent.
21.
Neither inhereth evil in existent creatures.
335 335 So far D.
has been showing that evil is not an ultimate principle, being neither (1) identical with the Good, nor (2j self-subsistent.
Now he argues that it is not a necessary element in any created thing: neither in their existence as such, nor in any particular kind of creature.
For if all creatures are from the Good, and the Good is in them all and embraces them all, either evil can have no place amongst the creatures, or else it must have a place in the Good.
336 336 D.
rambles characteristically, but the general argument is plain.
All existence is from the Good.
Hence, if evil is inherent in the nature of existence, evil is from the Good.
Thus D.
meets again and proceeds to lay the ghost of a theory which he has already elaborately slain in the previous section.
Now it cannot inhere in the Good, any more than cold can inhere in fire; just so the quality of becoming evil cannot inhere in that which turns even evil into good.
And if evil doth inhere in the Good, what will the mode of its inherence be?
If you say: It cometh of the Good, I answer: That is absurd and impossible.
For (as the infallible Scriptures say), a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, nor yet is the converse possible.
But if it cometh not of the Good, it is plainly from another origin and cause.
Either evil must come from the Good, or the Good from evil, or else (if this is impossible} both the Good and evil must be from another origin or cause.
For no duality can be an origin: same unity must be the origin of all duality.
And yet it is absurd to suppose that two entirely 118 opposite things can owe their birth and their being to the same thing.
This would make the origin itself not a simple unity but divided, double, self-contradictory and discordant.
Nor again is it possible that the world should have two contradictory origins, existing in each other and in the whole and mutually at strife.
For, 337 337 Having just given a metaphysical argument for the non-existence of evil, D.
now gives an argument drawn from the actual nature of the universe and of God’s creative activity.
This argument is not so satisfactory as the metaphysical one, for, under all the harmony of the world, there is perpetual strife, and the Cross of Christ reveals God as suffering pain.
“Christ is in an agony and will be till the end of the world” ( Pascal ).
The metaphysical argument is sound because metaphysics deal with ultimate ideals, and evil is ultimately or ideally non-existent.
The argument from actual facts is unsound because evil is actually existent.
Much wrong thinking on the subject of evil is due to a confusion of ideal with actual non-existence.
D.
here seems to fall into this mistake.
were this assumed, God 338 338 D.
here uses the name “God” because he is thinking of the Absolute or the Good, not in Its ultimate Nature, but in Its emanating or creative activity, in which the Personal Differentiations of the Trinity appear.
See II.
7.
§ Ask Guru about this passage →Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology
Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.
The passage argues that evil cannot be an ultimate principle or inherent in existent creatures, negating positive ontological categories.
All passages →Divine Simplicitytheology
The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.
The argument that evil cannot inhere in the Good implies a unity where no composite attributes or contradictions exist.
All passages →Evil As Privationtheology
Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.
The passage centrally argues that evil is not an ultimate principle but a non-existent quality that cannot inhere in the Good or existent creatures.
All passages →Living Godtheology
The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.
The text references God's creative activity and the nature of existence flowing from the Good as an active principle.
All passages →Monadcosmology
The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.
The argument centers on the Good as a singular source from which all existence flows, implying a simple undivided first principle.
All passages →Unity Of Beingtheology
The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.
The passage asserts that all existence is from the Good and embraces them all, implying a unified divine source.
All passages →Related passages · 15 of 99 parallels
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 448
“Section 16 16. We have, of course, already seen that a secondary must follow upon the First, and that this is a power immeasurably fruitful; and we indicated that this truth is confirmed by the entire order of things since there is nothing,…”
Shared concept: Monad — The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows. (derived)
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 611
“Section 4 4. Then consider this god [in man] whom we cannot think to be absent at some point and present at another. All that have insight into the nature of the divine beings hold the omnipresence of this god and of all the gods, and reaso…”
Shared concept: Divine Simplicity — The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being. (derived)
gnosticism|Gospel of Thomas|Logion 74
“He said, "O Lord, there are many around the drinking trough, but there is nothing in the cistern."…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|The Bhagavad Gita|Chapter XVII, Section 1b
“That gift is said (to be) good, which is given, because it ought to be given, to one who (can) do no service (in return), at a (proper) place and time, an d to a (proper) person.
But that gift which is given with much difficulty, for a ret…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Book I|Sutra 3
“Then the Seer comes to consciousness in his proper nature. Egotism is but the perversion of spiritual being. Ambition is the inversion of spiritual power. Passion is the distortion of love. The mortal is the limitation of the immortal. When…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Book I|Sutra 4
“Heretofore the Seer has been enmeshed in the activities of the psychic nature. The power and life which are the heritage of the spiritual man have been caught and enmeshed in psychical activities. Instead of pure being in the Divine, there…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Book I|Sutra 8
“Unsound intellection is false understanding, not resting on a perception of the true nature of things. When the object is not truly perceived, when the observation is inaccurate and faulty. thought or reasoning based on that mistaken percep…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Book I|Sutra 12
“The control of these psychic activities comes through the right use of the will, and through ceasing from self-indulgence. If these psychical powers and energies, even such evil things as passion and hate and fear, are but spiritual powers…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Book I|Sutra 32
“Steady application to a principle is the way to put a stop to these. The will, which, in its pristine state, was full of vigour, has been steadily corrupted by self-indulgence, the seeking of moods and sensations for sensation's sake. Hence…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Book II|Sutra 3
“These are the hindrances: the darkness of unwisdom, self-assertion, lust hate, attachment. Let us try to translate this into terms of the psychical and spiritual man. The darkness of unwisdom is, primarily, the self-absorption of the psychi…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Book IV|Sutra 1
“Psychic and spiritual powers may be inborn, or they may be gained by the use of drugs, or by incantations, or by fervour, or by Meditation. Spiritual powers have been enumerated and described in the preceding sections. They are the normal p…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
hinduism|Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Book IV|Sutra 30
“Thereon comes surcease from sorrow and the burden of toil. Such a one, it is said, is free from the bond of Karma, from the burden of toil, from that debt to works which comes from works done in self-love and desire. Free from self-will, he…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
jewish_mysticism|The Kabbalah Unveiled|Introduction, Section 1p
“66 the sins of the inferiors, no influx can come into the universe in a proper manner.) [Following out the symbol of the equilibrium in the Sephiroth, the sin of the inferior paths would be the introduction of unbalanced force.
The reader…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XVIII-b
“A certain thing of this kind also may take 71 place in the harmony and crasis of the universe: for the same things may be the salvation of the whole, through the perfection of the things inherent and the recipients; but may be noxious to th…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XXXI-a
“Again, therefore, still worse than this is the explanation of sacred operations, which assigns as the cause of divination, “ a certain genus of dæmons, which is naturally fraudulent, omniform, and various, and which assumes the appearance o…”
Shared concept: Evil As Privation — Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness. (derived)