Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 20 of 39 · tr. C.E. Rolt
Chapter 4, Section 1t
For in the case of other qualities, such as heat or cold, the things which have been warmed have their being even when they lose their warmth, and many of the creatures there are which have no life or mind; and in like manner God transcendeth all being and so is Super-Essential; 330 330 God exists without Essence, as an object can exist without this particular quality or that.
and generally, in all other cases, though the quality be gone or hath never been present, the creatures yet have being and can subsist; but that which is utterly bereft of the Good never had, nor hath, nor ever shall have, no nor can have any sort of being whatever.
For instance, the depraved sinner, though bereft of the Good by his brutish desire, is in this respect unreal and desires unrealities; but still he hath a share in the Good in so far as there is in him a distorted reflection of true Love and Communion.
331 331 D.
is thinking especially of carnal sin.
Such sin is a depraved form of that which, in its true purity, is a mystery, symbolizing the Unitive Life.
And anger hath a share in the Good, in so far as it is a movement which seeks to remedy apparent evils, converting them to that which appears to be fair.
And even he that desires the basest life, yet in so far as he feels desire at all and feels desire for life, and intends what he thinks the best kind of life, so far participates in the Good.
And if you wholly destroy the Good, there drill be neither being, life, desire, nor motion, or any other thing.
Hence the birth of fresh 116 life out of destruction is not the function of evil but is the presence of Good in a lesser form, even as disease is a disorder, yet not the destruction of all order, for if this happen the disease itself will not exist.
332 332 A diseased body still lives.
Death ends the disease.
But the disease remains and exists.
Its essence is order reduced to a minimum ; and in this it consists.
For that which is utterly without the Good hath neither being nor place amongst the things that are in being; but that which is of mixed nature owes to the Good its place among things in being, and hath this place amongst them and hath being just so far as it participates in the Good.
Or rather all things in being will have their being more or less in proportion as they participate in the Good.
For so far as mere Being is concerned, that which hath not being in any respect will not exist at all; that which hath being in one respect but not in another doth not exist in so far as it hath fallen away from the everlasting Being; while in so far as it hath a share of being, to that extent it exists; and thus both an element of existence and an element of non-existence in it are kept and preserved.
So too with evil.
That which is utterly fallen from Good can have no place either in the things which are more good or in the things which are less so.
That which is good in one respect but not in another is at war with some particular good but not with the whole of the Good.
It also is preserved by the admixture of the Good, and thus the Good giveth existence to the lack of Itself through some element of Itself being present there.
For if the Good be entirely removed, there will not remain aught at all, either good or mixed or absolutely bad.
For if evil is imperfect Goodness, the perfect absence of the Good will remove both the perfect and the imperfect Good, and evil will only exist and appear because, while it is evil in relation to one kind of good (being the contrary 117 thereof), yet it depends for its existence on another kind of good and, to that extent, is good itself.
Themes
◆Apophatic Theologytheology
Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.
The text emphasizes God's transcendence of all categories like being and essence.
Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.
The passage explicitly defines evil as 'imperfect Goodness' and a lack of the Good rather than positive being.
The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.
The depraved sinner is described as bereft of the Good and unreal, indicating a condition of exile from the divine source.