← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 20 of 39 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 4, Section 1t

For in the case of other qualities, such as heat or cold, the things which have been warmed have their being even when they lose their warmth, and many of the creatures there are which have no life or mind; and in like manner God transcendeth all being and so is Super-Essential; 330 330 God exists without Essence, as an object can exist without this particular quality or that. and generally, in all other cases, though the quality be gone or hath never been present, the creatures yet have being and can subsist; but that which is utterly bereft of the Good never had, nor hath, nor ever shall have, no nor can have any sort of being whatever. For instance, the depraved sinner, though bereft of the Good by his brutish desire, is in this respect unreal and desires unrealities; but still he hath a share in the Good in so far as there is in him a distorted reflection of true Love and Communion. 331 331 D. is thinking especially of carnal sin. Such sin is a depraved form of that which, in its true purity, is a mystery, symbolizing the Unitive Life. And anger hath a share in the Good, in so far as it is a movement which seeks to remedy apparent evils, converting them to that which appears to be fair. And even he that desires the basest life, yet in so far as he feels desire at all and feels desire for life, and intends what he thinks the best kind of life, so far participates in the Good. And if you wholly destroy the Good, there drill be neither being, life, desire, nor motion, or any other thing. Hence the birth of fresh 116 life out of destruction is not the function of evil but is the presence of Good in a lesser form, even as disease is a disorder, yet not the destruction of all order, for if this happen the disease itself will not exist. 332 332 A diseased body still lives. Death ends the disease. But the disease remains and exists. Its essence is order reduced to a minimum ; and in this it consists. For that which is utterly without the Good hath neither being nor place amongst the things that are in being; but that which is of mixed nature owes to the Good its place among things in being, and hath this place amongst them and hath being just so far as it participates in the Good. Or rather all things in being will have their being more or less in proportion as they participate in the Good. For so far as mere Being is concerned, that which hath not being in any respect will not exist at all; that which hath being in one respect but not in another doth not exist in so far as it hath fallen away from the everlasting Being; while in so far as it hath a share of being, to that extent it exists; and thus both an element of existence and an element of non-existence in it are kept and preserved. So too with evil. That which is utterly fallen from Good can have no place either in the things which are more good or in the things which are less so. That which is good in one respect but not in another is at war with some particular good but not with the whole of the Good. It also is preserved by the admixture of the Good, and thus the Good giveth existence to the lack of Itself through some element of Itself being present there. For if the Good be entirely removed, there will not remain aught at all, either good or mixed or absolutely bad. For if evil is imperfect Goodness, the perfect absence of the Good will remove both the perfect and the imperfect Good, and evil will only exist and appear because, while it is evil in relation to one kind of good (being the contrary 117 thereof), yet it depends for its existence on another kind of good and, to that extent, is good itself.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text emphasizes God's transcendence of all categories like being and essence.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The depraved sinner is described as unreal and desiring unrealities due to his brutish desire.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

God is described as Super-Essential and existing without Essence, implying radical concealment.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage explicitly defines evil as 'imperfect Goodness' and a lack of the Good rather than positive being.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is described as existing without Essence but still possessing Being.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The reference to God as Super-Essential implies a singular transcendent source.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text discusses the Unitive Life and Communion as symbols of participation in the Good.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text presents paradoxical statements such as God existing without Essence while still possessing Being.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The mention of the 'Unitive Life' implies a movement back toward the divine origin.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The depraved sinner is described as bereft of the Good and unreal, indicating a condition of exile from the divine source.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text suggests that all things in being owe their existence to the Good in varying degrees.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VI
Moreover, the gifts arising from the manifestations are not all of them equal, nor have the same fruits. But the presence [44] of the Gods, indeed, imparts to us health of body, virtue of soul, purity of intellect, and in one word elevates…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the divine and the nature of existence, emphasizing the role of the divine (Good in Passage A, Gods in Passage B) in sustaining being and virtue. They also explore the gradations of existence and the impact of various spiritual entities on the world.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 295 (part 2)
This means that it is no external limit that defines the individual being or the extension of souls any more than of God; on the contrary each in right of its own power is all that it chooses to be: and we are not to think of it as going fo…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the Good (or divine) and existence. Pseudo-Dionysius emphasizes that all being participates in the Good to some degree, while Plotinus explains the omnipresence of the soul (or divine) in all living things, highlighting the unity and continuity of existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 356
Section 36 36. The Universe is immensely varied, the container of all the Reason-Principles and of infinite and diverse efficacies. In man, we are told, the eye has its power, and the bones have their varied powers, and so with each separat…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the Good (or divine principles) and existence. Pseudo-Dionysius emphasizes that all being derives from the Good, while Plotinus (Select Works) explains the hierarchy of life and soul within the universe, suggesting that all parts of the cosmos have a hidden life connected to the divine.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|Fifth Dialoguek
That is a maxim of the Epicureans which, being well understood, would not be considered so unworthy as the ignorant hold it to be, seeing that it does not detract from what I have called virtue, nor does it impair the perfection of firmness…”
Both passages explore the relationship between good and evil, being and non-being, and the role of participation in a higher principle. Pseudo-Dionysius discusses the participation of all things in the Good, while the Fifth Dialogue discusses the Epicurean concept of pleasure and the absence of pain, both touching on the idea of perfection and the role of higher principles in human experience.