← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 82 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter I

Let us then, in the next place, consider the opposing arguments, what they are, and what reason they possess. And if we should discuss some things a little more abundantly, in consequence of speaking freely and at leisure, it is requisite that you should promptly attend to, and endure what, we say. For it is necessary that great labour should be bestowed on the greatest disciplines, and that they should be accurately explored for a long time, if you intend to know them perfectly. Do you, therefore, conformably to the present hypothesis, propose the arguments which occasion the doubt, and I will answer you. Say then, “ it very much perplexes me to understand how superior beings, when invoked, are commanded by those that invoke them, as if they were their inferiors .” But I will unfold to you the whole division, which is worthy of regard, concerning the powers that are invoked; from which you will be able clearly to define what is possible 204 and what is impossible, in the subjects of your investigation. For the Gods, indeed, and the natures that are more excellent than we, through the wish of what is beautiful, and from an unenvying and exuberant fulness of good, benevolently impart to those that are worthy, such things as are fit for them, commiserating the labours of sacerdotal men, but being delighted with those that they have begotten, nourished, and instructed. But the middle genera are the inspective guardians of judgment. These inform us what ought to be done, and from what it is fit to abstain. They also give assistance to just works, but impede such as are unjust; and as many endeavour to take away unjustly the property of others, or basely to injure or destroy some one, they cause these to suffer the same things as they have done to others. But there is, likewise, another most irrational genus of dæmons, [85] which is without judgment, and is allotted only one power, through an arrangement by which each of these dæmons presides over one work alone. As therefore, it is the province of a sword to cut, and to do 205 nothing else than this, thus also of the spirits which are distributed in the universe, according to the partible necessity of nature, one kind divides, but another collects, things which are generated. This, however, is known from the phænomena. For the Charonean [86] spiracles, as they are called, emit from themselves a certain spirit, which is able to corrupt promiscuously every thing that falls into them. Thus, therefore, of certain invisible spirits, each is allotted a different power, and is alone adapted to do that which it is ordained to perform. He, therefore, who turns from their natural course things which contribute to the universe in an orderly manner, and illegitimately performs a certain thing, in this case receives the injury arising from that which he uses badly. This, however, pertains to another mode of discussion. 206
Themes
Cosmic Sympathycosmology

The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.

The passage describes spirits that cause those who harm others to suffer the same fate as they have done to others.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

The text asserts that dæmons and spirits are allotted specific powers through an arrangement by which each presides over one work alone.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

A distinction is made between Gods, middle genera, and irrational dæmons in a hierarchical order of being.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The text defines the irrational genus of dæmons as having no judgment and being allotted only one power through arrangement rather than positive evil nature.

All passages →
Good Thought Word Deedethics

The Zoroastrian triad of right thought, right speech, and right action as the foundation of ethical life; truth-in-living.

The passage outlines that middle genera inform us what ought to be done and from what it is fit to abstain, aligning with right thought and action.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Gods are described as benevolently imparting things to worthy recipients and being delighted with those they have begotten.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage explicitly addresses the paradoxical claim that superior beings are commanded by those who invoke them as if they were their inferiors.

All passages →
Ritual Puritypraxis

The maintenance of a state of cleanliness—physical, moral, or spiritual—required for encounter with the divine.

The mention of 'sacerdotal men' and their labours implies a requirement for ritual or spiritual preparation in the invocation process.

All passages →
Theurgypraxis

Iamblichean ritual practice that engages the gods directly through consecrated material symbols and actions, on the premise that divine power descends into properly prepared matter — distinct from philosophical contemplation alone.

The passage explicitly discusses the invocation of powers and spirits, engaging with divine entities through ritual action rather than philosophical contemplation alone.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1a
BOOK VI SOCRATES - GLAUCON AND thus, Glaucon, after the argument has gone a weary way, the true and the false philosophers have at length appeared in view. I do not think, he said, that the way could have been shortened. I suppose not, I…”
Both passages discuss the nature of higher beings or philosophers and their relationship to truth and the universe. They explore the qualities and roles of those who seek to understand and govern according to eternal truths, showing a conceptual parallel in their mystical traditions.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1d
And when I speak of the other division of the intelligible, you will understand me to speak of that other sort of knowledge which reason herself attains by the power of dialectic, using the hypotheses not as first principles, but only as hy…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchical nature of knowledge and beings, with Iamblichus describing different types of divine and daemonic entities and their roles, while Plato's passage outlines the levels of understanding and the faculties of the soul corresponding to these levels. Both emphasize the importance of ascending to higher principles or beings to attain true knowledge.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 124 (part 9)
The harmonising of them is to be found in the invisible operation of Heaven, and by following this on into the unlimited past. It is by this method that we can complete our years (without our minds being disturbed) 1 . 'What is meant by h…”
Both passages explore the interaction between different levels of existence or beings and the human attempt to understand and harmonize with them. They discuss the nature of higher beings or forces and their relationship with humans, albeit from different cultural and philosophical contexts.