← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 9 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter VII

Of the extremes, therefore, one is supreme, transcendent, and perfect; but the other is last in dignity, deficient, and more imperfect. And the former, indeed, is capable of accomplishing all things at once, uniformly in an instant; but the latter is neither able to effect all things, nor at once, nor suddenly, nor impartibly. The former also generates and governs all things, without being inclined towards them; but the latter is naturally disposed to verge, and be converted to the things which it generates and governs. And the former, indeed, as primordial and cause, precedes all things in power; but the latter, being suspended from the will of the Gods, as from a cause, is from eternity consubsistent with it. The former, likewise, according to one vigorous acme, comprehends the ends of all energies and essences; but the latter passes from some things to others, 37 and proceeds from the imperfect to the perfect. Farther still, to the former that which is highest and that which is incomprehensible pertain, and also that which is better than all measure, and is in such a manner formless, as not to be circumscribed by any form; but the latter is vanquished by inclination, habitude, and propensity; and is detained by appetites directed to that which is less excellent, and by familiarity with secondary natures. Hence, in the last place, it is formalized by all-various measures derived from them. Intellect, therefore, which is the leader and king of all beings, and which is the demiurgic art of the universe, is always present with the Gods with invariable sameness, perfectly, and without indigence, being purely established in itself, according to one energy. But soul participates of a partible and multiform intellect, having its attention directed to the government of the whole. It also providentially attends to inanimate natures, becoming at different times ingenerated in different forms. From the same causes, therefore, order and beauty itself are consubsistent with the more excellent genera; or, if some one had rather admit it, the cause of these is consubsistent with them. But with soul, the participation of intellectual order and divine beauty is always present. And with the former, indeed, the 38 measure of wholes, or the cause of this, perpetually concurs. But soul is terminated by the divine boundary, and participates of this in a partible manner. To the former, also, empire over all beings, through the power and domination of cause, may be reasonably ascribed. But soul has certain distinct boundaries, as far as to which it is able to have dominion. Such, therefore, being the different peculiarities in the extremes, it will not be difficult to understand what we have now said, and to perceive the middle peculiarities of dæmons and heroes, which are allied to each of the extremes, possessing a similitude, to each, departing from both to the medium, and embracing a concordant communion comingled from them, and connected with it in appropriate measures. Such, therefore, must be conceived to be the peculiarities of the first divine genera.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text explicitly describes the supreme principle as formless and incomprehensible, transcending all circumscription.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The soul is described as being detained by appetites and familiar with secondary natures that hinder its higher participation.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The passage establishes a fundamental ontological opposition between two extremes: one supreme and perfect versus one deficient and imperfect.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The supreme principle is described as incomprehensible and formless, residing beyond ordinary knowledge or perception.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The text describes a structured hierarchy of divine principles flowing from the supreme to the deficient, with dæmons and heroes occupying intermediate levels.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Deficiency and imperfection are characterized as states of being rather than positive ontological entities.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The supreme principle is described as one supreme, transcendent, and perfect source from which all flows.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text uses apparent contradictions such as one being capable of accomplishing all things at once while the other is deficient and imperfect.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The inferior principle is described as suspended from the will of the Gods and consubstantial with them rather than transcendent.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text notes that order and beauty are consubsistent with more excellent genera, implying a unified cosmic structure.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1b
Plotinus says the Godhead is indivisibly divided. doth not leave Its own Unity, but, even in the act of going forth to all things, remains entirely within Itself through the excess of that all-transcendent Unity: concerning these things ‘t…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation, emphasizing unity, transcendence, and the distinction between the supreme and the imperfect. They explore how the divine interacts with the world while maintaining its own unity and perfection.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1j
For from It and through It are all Being and life of spirit and of soul; and hence in the realm of nature magnitudes both small, co-equal and great; hence all the measured order and the proportions of things, which, by their different harmo…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchy and relationship between different levels of existence, emphasizing the role of a supreme, transcendent principle (Intellect in Iamblichus, the Beautiful and Good in the second passage) in governing and generating all things. They also explore the nature of soul and its connection to higher principles.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1o
And herein the Divine Yearning showeth especially its beginningless and endless nature, revolving in a perpetual circle for the Good, from the Good, in the Good, and to the Good, with unerring revolution, never varying its centre or directi…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchical and interconnected nature of divine and cosmic principles, emphasizing the relationship between higher and lower realms, and the role of intermediaries or yearnings that connect these realms. They share a conceptual parallel in exploring the structure and dynamics of divine and cosmic order.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 8, Section 1e
It thus = (1) “equality”; (2) “rightness.” D. maintains that all things possess the latter though not the former. 421 The highest power our minds can conceive is that of the angels. But God has the dominion over them, and hence His power…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine and lesser beings, emphasizing the supremacy and perfection of the highest power (God or Intellect) and the imperfection and multiplicity of lower beings (soul or created things). They explore the relationship between the divine and the created, highlighting the unity and indivisibility of the divine power versus the multiplicity and divisibility of created beings.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|Third Dialoguef
Fitly, therefore, this rapture of heroic enthusiasm feeds on such "high emprise." For the object is infinite, and in action most simple, and our intellectual power cannot apprehend the infinite except in speech or in a certain manner of spe…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the ultimate or divine and the human striving towards it. They explore the concepts of perfection, imperfection, and the human condition in relation to the divine, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part II (Gli Eroici Furori)|First Dialoguem
Thus everything has an impetus towards its beginning retrogressively, and progressively towards its end and perfection, as Empedocles well said, and from which sentence I think may be inferred that which the Nolan said in this octave: The s…”
Both passages explore the concept of the soul's journey towards its divine origin and the nature of its powers. They discuss the soul's dual nature, its striving for perfection, and its relationship with the divine, albeit within different philosophical and mystical frameworks.