← Home
The Bhagavad Gita · 1 of 2 · tr. Kashinath Trimbak Telang

Chapter XIII, Section 1a

CHAPTER XIII. The Deity said: This body, O son of Kuntî! is called Kshetra , and the learned call him who knows it the Kshetra g ña. . And know me also, O descendant of Bharata! to be the Kshetra g ña in all Kshetras. The knowledge of Kshetra and Kshetra g ña is deemed by me (to be real) knowledge. Now hear from me in brief what that Kshetra (is), what (it is) like, what changes (it undergoes), and whence (it comes), and what is he , and what his powers, (all which) is sung in various ways by sages in numerous hymns , distinctly, and in well-settled texts full of argument, giving indications or full instruction about the Brahman. The great elements , egoism, the understanding, the unperceived also, the ten senses, and the one, and the five objects of sense, desire, aversion, pleasure, pain, body, consciousness, courage, thus in brief has been declared the Kshetra with changes . Absence of vanity, absence of ostentatiousness, absence of hurtfulness, forgiveness, straightforwardness, devotion to a preceptor, purity , steadiness, self-restraint, indifference towards objects of sense, and also absence of egoism; perception of the misery and evil of birth, death , old age, and disease; absence of attachment, absence of self-identifying regard for son, wife , home, and so forth; and constant equability on the approach of (both what is) agreeable and (what is) disagreeable; unswerving devotion to me, without meditation on any one else; resorting to clean places, distaste for assemblages of men , constancy in knowledge of the relation of the individual self to the supreme, perception of the object of knowledge of the truth, this is called knowledge; that is ignorance which is opposed to this. I will declare that which is the object of knowledge, knowing which, one reaches immortality; the highest Brahman, having no beginning nor end, which cannot be said to be existent or non-existent . It has hands and feet on all sides, it has eyes, heads, and faces on all sides, it has ears on all sides, it stands pervading everything in the world. Possessed of the qualities of all the senses, (but) devoid of all senses , unattached, it supports all, is devoid of qualities, and the enjoyer of qualities. It is within all things and without them; it is movable and also immovable; it is unknowable through (its) subtlety; it stands afar and near . Not different in (different) things , but standing as though different, it should be known to be the supporter of (all) things, and that which absorbs and creates (them). It is the radiance even of the radiant (bodies); it is said (to be) beyond darkness. It is knowledge, the object of knowledge, that which is to be attained to by knowledge, and placed in the heart of all . Thus in brief have Kshetra, knowledge, and the object of knowledge been declared. My devotee, knowing this, becomes fit for assimilation with me. Know nature and spirit both (to be) without beginning, and know all developments and qualities (to be) produced from nature. Nature is said to be the origin of the capacity of working (residing) in the body and the senses; and spirit is said (to be) the origin of the capacity of enjoying pleasures and pains . For spirit with nature joined, enjoys the qualities born of nature. And the cause of its birth in good or evil wombs is the connexion with the qualities .
§ Ask Guru about this passage →
Themes
Anthropomorphismtheology

Attributing human characteristics, emotions, or form to the divine; embodied divine imagery.

The Supreme is described as having 'hands and feet on all sides,' 'eyes, heads, and faces,' using human imagery to describe the omnipresent divine.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The highest Brahman is described as 'cannot be said to be existent or non-existent' and 'unknowable through (its) subtlety,' utilizing negation to define the divine.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The passage distinguishes between 'Nature' (Prakriti) as the origin of action and 'Spirit' (Purusha) as the origin of enjoyment, presenting a fundamental duality.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

The passage lists 'absence of attachment,' 'indifference towards objects of sense,' and 'absence of egoism' as essential qualities of true knowledge.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

The Supreme is described as 'the radiance even of the radiant (bodies)' and 'beyond darkness,' identifying the divine with a luminous quality.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The text describes the Supreme as 'devoid of qualities' and 'not different in (different) things,' hinting at a non-composite nature despite the anthropomorphic descriptions.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage repeatedly emphasizes that 'knowledge of Kshetra and Kshetragña' is the only real knowledge and the means to reach immortality.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

The text states that the object of knowledge is 'placed in the heart of all,' indicating a divine presence or light residing within every being.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Deity speaks directly ('I will declare,' 'know me also'), presenting the divine as an active, personal reality rather than an abstract principle.

All passages →
Microcosm Macrocosmcosmology

The human being as a small-scale image of the entire cosmos; the body, soul, and intellect mirroring the structure of the heavens and the divine — distinct from correspondence in that it makes the human the privileged mirror.

The passage explicitly defines the body (Kshetra) as containing all cosmic elements and principles, establishing the human being as a mirror of the entire cosmos.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text states that the devotee who knows these truths becomes 'fit for assimilation with me,' describing a merging of the individual self with the Supreme.

All passages →
Rejection Of Hypocrisyethics

Critique of outward religious observance that lacks inner transformation; form without substance.

The text explicitly calls for 'absence of vanity' and 'absence of ostentatiousness,' rejecting outward show without inner substance.

All passages →
Renunciation Of Wealthethics

The spiritual danger of attachment to material possessions; wealth as a spiritual obstacle.

The passage advises 'absence of self-identifying regard for son, wife, home,' and 'distaste for assemblages of men,' suggesting a renunciation of worldly attachments.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

Knowing the object of knowledge leads to 'immortality' and 'assimilation with me,' indicating a return to the divine origin.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The text equates knowing the 'Kshetra' (the body/self) and its knower with the highest form of knowledge required for liberation.

All passages →
Soul Migrationcosmology

The transmigration of the soul across lives.

The text mentions the 'misery and evil of birth, death, old age, and disease' and the cause of 'birth in good or evil wombs,' implying a cycle of rebirth.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text declares that the Supreme Spirit (Kshetragña) pervades all things, is within and without, and that knowing this unity leads to assimilation with the Divine.

All passages →
Related passages · 2 parallels · 1 contrast
christian_mysticism|Revelations of Divine Love|Chapter XXXV
"I desired to learn assuredly as to a certain creature that I loved.... It is more worship to God to behold Him in all than in any special thing" And when God Almighty had shewed so plenteously and joyfully of His Goodness, I desired to lea…”
Both passages emphasize the importance of perceiving the divine in all things and the interconnectedness of creation. They share a conceptual parallel in the insight that the divine is present in everything and that true understanding comes from seeing the unity and rightfulness of all things.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1b
For It doth will to be, and It is both Itself and most of all by reason of Itself. Indeed, all other things beside are just bacause of It; for the distinctive feature of the Good is "that it should be known". Such is the Good, O Tat. Tat…”
Both passages describe a transcendent, all-pervading divine principle that is the source and supporter of all things. The Bhagavad Gita refers to this as Brahman, while the Hermetic text refers to it as the Good. Both emphasize the divine's omnipresence and the transformative power of knowing or perceiving it.
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1gCONTRASTS
Therefore he is called an Anâgâmin.' Bhagavat said: 'What do you think, O Subhûti, does an Arhat think in this wise: The fruit of an Arhat has been obtained by me?' Subhûti said: 'Not indeed, O Bhagavat, an Arhat does not think in this wise…”
Both passages explore the nature of the self and the ultimate reality, emphasizing the transcendence of individual identity and the interconnectedness of all things. The Bhagavad Gita discusses the concept of Kshetra and Kshetra-gña, while the Diamond Sutra talks about the non-existence of a fixed self in the context of an Arhat.