← Home
The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme · 19 of 159 · tr. Franz Hartmann

Chapter 2 (part 6)

2.) "If there is to be a light, there must be a fire. The fire produces the light, and the light renders the fire manifest; it receives the nature of the fire within itself and resides in the fire." ( Mysterium , xl. 2.) "Joy enters the state of desire for the purpose of producing a fiery love, a realm of happiness, which could not exist in the tranquillity." ( Signature , vi. 2.) "The majesty of God could not become revealed in power, joy, and magnificence, if it were not for the attraction caused by desire. Likewise there could be no light, if desire were not entering and overshadowing, and thereby creating a state of darkness, which grows until the ignition of the fire takes place." ( Grace , ii. 14.) Relative good cannot exist without relative evil, and evil cannot exist without good. The fire can no more exist without the light than the light without the fire. No multiplicity is possible without the unity. Each requires and therefore desires the other. "Light and darkness are opposed to each other, but there is between them a link, so that neither of them could exist without the other." ( Threefold Life , ii. 86.) "In God there are two states, eternally and without end—namely, the eternal light and eternal darkness. The light is God, and in the darkness there would be no pain if it were not for the presence of the light. The light causes the darkness to long for the light and to suffer anguish therefor." ( Three Principles , ix. 30.) "The will having issued from the state of unity (by assuming a position, as it were, against the unity in desiring its own self), enters as a state of desire, and this desire is magnetic—that is to say, indrawing; but the unity as such is outflowing; it seeks to issue outwardly, p. 69 so as to become revealed. The will having issued from the state of unity, desires to enter within itself, so as to attain sensation in the unity, and that thereby the unity may attain sensation in the will." ( Theosophical Questions , iii. 9.) "The light-life has its own motion and impulse, and likewise the fire-life; but the latter generates the former and the former is the lord of the latter. If there were no fire, there would be no light and no spirit; and if there were no spirit to breathe upon the fire, the latter would be extinguished and darkness would rule. Each of the two would be nothing without the other; both are mutually dependent upon each other." ( Forty Questions , i. 62.) There is, however, no equality between this duality, for the unity is superior to the multiplicity, freedom to nature, light to fire; the higher always rules the lower. "The will as such is an insensible life, but it finds the desire, and in willing to desire it constitutes itself in a being. The will is superior to the desire, for although the desire is an exciting cause for the will, the will is a life without a cause and it is also intelligence. It is therefore, lord over desire. It rules the life of the desire and uses it as it pleases. This eternal will-spirit we know to be God, but the active life of the desire is eternal nature." ( Inner Mystery , i. 1; iii. 2.) "God is from eternity Power and Light, and is therefore called God according to that, but not according to the fire-spirit. In regard to the latter, we speak of it not as God, but as 'the wrath of God ' and the consuming part of His power.
Themes
Alchemical Workpraxis

The transformation of base substance — outer matter or the inner soul — into a purified, perfected, or 'gold' state; the magnum opus as both laboratory practice and spiritual allegory.

The text uses fire, ignition, and light metaphors to describe the transformation and revelation of divine power.

All passages →
Anthropomorphismtheology

Attributing human characteristics, emotions, or form to the divine; embodied divine imagery.

Human-like attributes such as joy, desire, perception, and love are explicitly attributed to the divine nature.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

God is described as unknowable without the presence of the opposite or 'No'.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The passage states that God would be unknowable without the presence of the opposing 'No,' implying a state of concealment.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

A hierarchy is established where unity is superior to multiplicity and the higher always rules the lower.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is described as active, possessing life, joy, and desire rather than being a static abstract principle.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The text explicitly identifies 'The One' as pure power and the truth of God from which manifestation flows.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text describes the unity attaining sensation in the will and the will entering within itself.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

A link is described between light and darkness so that neither could exist without the other.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text utilizes paradoxical logic, such as light requiring darkness or fire for ignition, to explain divine dynamics.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The will is described as issuing from unity and desiring to enter within itself to attain sensation.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The passage asserts that no multiplicity is possible without the unity and that all things require each other.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

[auto] The passage centrally defines reality through opposing pairs like light/darkness, good/evil, and yes/no that require each other to exist.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

[auto] Light is repeatedly identified with God Himself and the primary means of revelation and manifestation.

All passages →
Related passages · 16 parallels
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1e
And for this cause is water poured around earth, to be a guard and wall, to keep the blazing of the fire away. But mind, the swiftest thing of all divine outthinkings, and swifter than all elements, hath for its body fire. For mind being…”
Both passages explore the interplay between opposing forces (light/darkness, fire/water, piety/impious) and their roles in the divine and human realms, highlighting the necessity of these opposites for existence and perception.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 123
Section 1 1. By common agreement of all that have arrived at the conception of such a Kind, what is known as Matter is understood to be a certain base, a recipient of Form-Ideas. Thus far all go the same way. But departure begins with the a…”
Both passages discuss the necessity of evil or opposition in the universe for the manifestation of good or light. They explore the interdependence of seemingly opposing forces, with Plotinus emphasizing the completeness of the universe through evil and the Jacob Boehme text discussing the interplay of 'Yes' and 'No' or light and darkness.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 159
Section 3 3. Ever illuminated, receiving light unfailing, the All-Soul imparts it to the entire series of later Being which by this light is sustained and fostered and endowed with the fullest measure of life that each can absorb. It may be…”
Both passages discuss the interdependence of opposing forces or principles, such as light and darkness, fire and spirit, and the necessity of their interaction for the existence and functioning of the universe. They also highlight the hierarchical nature of these principles, with one being superior to the other.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 168 (part 2)
The theory, therefore, refers the entire process to pre-existing compulsions: the guilt inheres in the Primal Beings.…”
Both passages explore the relationship between a higher, divine principle and its manifestation in the lower realm. They discuss the nature of illumination, the interplay between light and darkness, and the dynamic between the divine and the created world, though from different philosophical and theological perspectives.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 204 (part 1)
Section 17 17. The nature of the Reason-Principle is adequately expressed in its Act and, therefore, the wider its extension the nearer will its productions approach to full contrariety: hence the world of sense is less a unity than is its…”
Both passages explore the concept of duality and the coexistence of opposites within a divine or universal framework. They discuss how seemingly contradictory elements (good and evil, light and darkness) are interdependent and necessary for the manifestation of a greater unity or harmony.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 249
Section 17 17. Nor can we, on the other hand, think that matter is simply Absolute Magnitude. Magnitude is not, like Matter, a receptacle; it is an Ideal-Principle: it is a thing standing apart to itself, not some definite Mass. The fact is…”
Both passages explore the relationship between opposing principles or forces. Plotinus discusses the interaction between the Reason-Principle and Matter, while the second passage examines the dynamic between the 'Yes' and the 'No' in divine revelation. Both highlight the necessity of contrast for the manifestation of reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 339
Section 19 19. Thus what we know as pleasure and pain may be identified: pain is our perception of a body despoiled, deprived of the image of the soul; pleasure our perception of the living frame in which the image of the soul is brought ba…”
Both passages discuss the interplay between unity and multiplicity, and the dynamic relationship between different aspects of the divine or ultimate reality. They explore the concepts of order, aspiration, and the interplay of opposites, though from different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 369
Section 3 3. For the most convincing proof that vision does not depend upon the transmission of impressions of any kind made upon the air, we have only to consider that in the darkness of night we can see a fire and the stars and their very…”
Both passages explore the relationship between light, vision, and the nature of perception. Plotinus discusses the spiritual and sympathetic nature of the universe in enabling vision, while Jakob Böhme delves into the interplay of light and darkness, fire and spirit, in the context of divine manifestation and perception. Both texts emphasize the interconnectedness and interdependence of elements in the cosmos.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 430
Section 1 1. The One is all things and no one of them; the source of all things is not all things; all things are its possession- running back, so to speak, to it- or, more correctly, not yet so, they will be. But a universe from an unbroke…”
Both passages explore the relationship between unity and multiplicity, light and darkness, and the interplay between different states of being. They both describe a dynamic interplay between opposing forces that are interdependent and necessary for the existence of each other, reflecting a deep conceptual parallel in their mystical insights.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 452 (part 2)
And again, if that secondary is all things, and if above its multiplicity there is a unity not ranking among those things, once more this unity transcends Real Being and therefore transcends the Intellectual-Principle as well. There is thu…”
Both passages explore the relationship between unity and multiplicity, and the nature of the divine source. They discuss how the One (or the Transcendent) gives rise to multiplicity while maintaining its own simplicity and primacy.
6 more
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 577 (part 1)
Section 16 16. When each of the entities bound up with the pseudo-substance is taken apart from the rest, the name of Quality is given to that one among them, by which without pointing to essence or quantity or motion we signify the distin…”
Both passages explore the relationship between fundamental concepts and their manifestations, with Plotinus discussing the nature of Being and its attributes, while the second passage examines the interplay between light and darkness, unity and multiplicity, and their interdependence. Both texts delve into the idea that higher principles give rise to and are necessary for the existence of lower or derived principles.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 663
Section 24 24. But ourselves- how does it touch us? We may recall what we have said of the nature of the light shining from it into Intellectual-Principle and so by participation into the soul. But for the moment let us leave that aside and…”
Both passages explore the relationship between unity and multiplicity, and the nature of the divine. Passage A discusses the primal unity and its manifestation in multiplicity, while Passage B describes the interplay between the 'Yes' and the 'No,' and the dynamic between light and darkness in the divine realm. Both texts emphasize the interdependence of these concepts.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 670
Section 31 31. But since Thence come the beauty and light in all, it is Thence that Intellectual-Principle took the brilliance of the Intellectual Energy which flashed Nature into being; Thence soul took power towards life, in virtue of tha…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between light, darkness, and the divine, emphasizing the interdependence and mutual manifestation of these elements. They explore the concept of the divine as a source of light and life, with the need for an opposite or complementary force to make it manifest.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 706
Section 2 2. It may be suggested that, while in the unities of the partial order the essence and the unity are distinct, yet in collective existence, in Real Being, they are identical, so that when we have grasped Being we hold unity; Real…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine and the relationship between the divine and other aspects of existence. They discuss the self-sufficiency and self-containment of the divine, as well as the interplay between different states or principles within the divine realm.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|Fifth Dialoguef
I understand it all; but what is the meaning of, "May I be happy in this governance and with these bonds, and may that light not cease?" Tans. He means, and he proves, that every sort of love, the greater its dominion and the surer its hol…”
Both passages explore the interplay between opposing forces—such as life and death, light and darkness, unity and multiplicity—to illustrate deeper metaphysical truths. They both use metaphors (the phoenix and the interplay of light and fire) to convey the idea of transformation and the necessity of opposites for existence and perception.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XV (part 3)
Now if a merely negligible percentage of energy goes into the creation of the future by begetting, then the remainder must go into the creation of the future also, but in another way. We have in the physical world many cases in which the d…”
Both passages explore the idea of dual aspects of a single force or energy, where one aspect is direct and the other indirect, but both are necessary and interconnected. Passage A uses the example of a candle's light and heat, while Passage B discusses the interplay of light and darkness, or the 'Yes' and the 'No,' in divine manifestation.