← Home
Meister Eckhart's Sermons (Field translation) · 16 of 23 · tr. Claud Field

VIa

SANCTIFICATION 1 1 That is separation from all outward things. St Luke x. 42 .—“One thing is needful.” I have read many writings both of heathen philosophers and inspired prophets, ancient and modern, and have sought earnestly to discover what is the best and highest quality whereby man may approach most nearly to union with God, and whereby he may most resemble the ideal of himself which existed in God, before God created men. And after having thoroughly searched these writings as far as my reason may penetrate, I find no higher quality than sanctification or separation from all creatures. Therefore said our Lord to Martha, “One thing is necessary,” as if to say, “whoso wishes to be untroubled and content, must have one thing, that is sanctification.” Various teachers have praised love greatly, as St Paul does, when he saith, “to whatever height I may attain, if I have not love, I am nothing.” But I set sanctification even above love; in the first place because the best thing in love is that it compels me to love God. Now it is a greater thing that I compel God to come to me, than that I compel myself to go to God. Sanctification compels God to come to me, and I prove this as follows:— Everything settles in its own appropriate place; now God’s proper place is that of oneness and holiness; these come from sanctification; therefore God must of necessity give Himself to a sanctified heart. In the second place I set sanctification above love, because love compels me to suffer all things for the sake of God; sanctification compels me to be the recipient of nothing but God; now, it is a higher state to be the recipient of nothing but God than to suffer all things for God, because in suffering one must have some regard to the person who inflicts the suffering, but sanctification is independent of all creatures. Many teachers also praise humility as a virtue. But I set sanctification above humility for the following reason. Although humility may exist without sanctification, perfect sanctification cannot exist without perfect humility. Perfect humility tends to the annihilation of self; sanctification also is so close to self-annihilation that nothing can come between them. Therefore perfect sanctification cannot exist without humility, and to have both of these virtues is better than to have only one of them. The second reason why I set sanctification above humility is that humility stoops to be under all creatures, and in doing so goes out of itself. But sanctification remains self-contained. But to remain contained within oneself is nobler than to go out of oneself for any purpose whatever; therefore saith the Psalmist, “The King’s daughter is all glorious within ,” that is, all her glory is from her inwardness. Perfect sanctification has no inclination nor going-out towards any creature; it wishes neither to be above or below, neither to be like nor unlike any creature, but only to be one . Whosoever wishes to be this or that wishes to be somewhat; but sanctification wishes to be nothing. But some one may say: “All virtues must have existed in fullness in Our Lady, therefore perfect sanctification must have been in her. If sanctification is higher than humility, why did Our Lady speak of her humility, and not of her sanctification, when she said, “For He hath regarded the lowliness of His handmaiden?” To this I answer that God possesses both sanctification and humility, so far as we may attribute virtues to God. Now thou shouldest know that His humility brought God to stoop down to human nature, and our Lady knew that He wished for the same quality in her, and in that matter had regard to her humility alone.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

Sanctification is defined by what it is not (nothing, independent of creatures), utilizing negation to describe the spiritual state.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

Sanctification is defined as separation from all outward things and independence of all creatures, implying the material world hinders union.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

God's proper place is described as that of oneness and holiness, suggesting a simple divine nature.

All passages →
Fana Annihilationsoteriology

Sufi self-effacement in God — the via by which the lover is unmade as a separate ego and recovered as God's act; specifies the practice/event rather than mystical_union's resulting state.

The text explicitly links perfect sanctification to the annihilation of self and states they are so close nothing can come between them.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

The reference to the King's daughter being all glorious within suggests a divine quality residing inside the person.

All passages →
Inner Silencepraxis

The practice of stilling the mind and speech to open receptivity to divine knowledge or presence.

The passage advocates remaining contained within oneself and finding glory in inwardness rather than going out to creatures.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

The text cites the Psalmist regarding the King's daughter being glorious within and states God gives Himself to a sanctified heart.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The author seeks to resemble the ideal of himself which existed in God before creation, implying a return to a divine origin.

All passages →
Theosis Deificationsoteriology

The doctrine — central to Eastern Orthodox and Maximian theology — that the human person is progressively transformed into a partaker of the divine nature by grace, not merely justified or united in passing ecstasy.

The goal is to resemble the ideal of oneself which existed in God and achieve union with Him.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text emphasizes oneness as God's proper place and states that sanctification wishes to be one.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

[auto] The passage defines sanctification as separation from all outward things and independence from creatures, aligning perfectly with Eckhart's concept of Gelassenheit.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The central theme is the soul's approach to union with God and God giving Himself to a sanctified heart.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The passage describes perfect sanctification as wishing neither to be above nor below, nor like nor unlike any creature.

All passages →
Poverty Of Spiritanthropology

Eckhart's radical reading of Matthew 5:3 — the saint as one who wants nothing, knows nothing, and has nothing, having emptied even the will and the self with which to receive God; distinct from renunciation_of_wealth (material poverty).

[auto] The text explicitly states that sanctification wishes to be nothing and requires having only one thing, reflecting Eckhart's doctrine of spiritual poverty.

All passages →
Related passages · 9 parallels
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 9 (part 1)
p. 45 PYTHAGOREAN ETHICAL SENTENCES FROM STOBÆUS 1. Do not even think of doing what ought not to be done. 2. Choose rather to be strong in soul than in body. 3. Be persuaded that things of a laborious nature contribute more than pleas…”
Both passages emphasize the importance of inner virtues and detachment from worldly things. Meister Eckhart's passage focuses on sanctification as the highest virtue, while the Pythagorean sentences highlight virtues like prudence, magnanimity, and fortitude, all of which align with the idea of inner purity and detachment from material concerns.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 19 (part 1)
Section 1 1. Since Evil is here, "haunting this world by necessary law," and it is the Soul's design to escape from Evil, we must escape hence. But what is this escape? "In attaining Likeness to God," we read. And this is explained as "…”
Both passages discuss the concept of attaining likeness or union with the divine through virtues and sanctification. They emphasize the importance of inner transformation and separation from worldly concerns to achieve a higher spiritual state.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 23
Section 5 5. So we come to the scope of the purification: that understood, the nature of Likeness becomes clear. Likeness to what Principle? Identity with what God? The question is substantially this: how far does purification dispel the tw…”
Both passages emphasize the purification and separation of the soul from worldly passions and desires as a means to achieve a higher spiritual state. They both advocate for a state of detachment and control over the lower nature to attain union with the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 39
Section 6 6. Now if happiness did indeed require freedom from pain, sickness, misfortune, disaster, it would be utterly denied to anyone confronted by such trials: but if it lies in the fruition of the Authentic Good, why turn away from thi…”
Both passages emphasize the pursuit of an ultimate, transcendent good that brings true happiness or union with the divine. They both argue for the primacy of this ultimate good over worldly necessities or virtues.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 67
Section 6 6. For, as the ancient teaching was, moral-discipline and courage and every virtue, not even excepting Wisdom itself, all is purification. Hence the Mysteries with good reason adumbrate the immersion of the unpurified in filth, ev…”
Both passages emphasize the importance of purification or sanctification as a means to approach the divine. They highlight the need to detach from worldly things and focus on the inner self to achieve a higher spiritual state.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 482 (part 1)
Section 4 4. To "live at ease" is There; and, to these divine beings, verity is mother and nurse, existence and sustenance; all that is not of process but of authentic being they see, and themselves in all: for all is transparent, nothing…”
Both passages describe a state of unity and transcendence, where the divine beings or the sanctified soul exist in a state of pure being and oneness. They emphasize the transcendence of the material world and the attainment of a higher, more perfect state of existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 649
Section 10 10. But failure There? What can defensive horns serve to There? To sufficiency as living form, to completeness. That principle must be complete as living form, complete as Intellect, complete as life, so that if it is not to be o…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and completeness within a divine or ideal context. Passage A from Plotinus emphasizes the unity and completeness of Intellect and life, while Passage B from the Christian mystical tradition focuses on sanctification as a means to achieve unity with God. Both explore the idea of a higher, unified state of being.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 686
Section 4 4. It will be asked how act rising from desire can be voluntary, since desire pulls outward and implies need; to desire is still to be drawn, even though towards the good. Intellectual-Principle itself comes under the doubt; havin…”
Both passages explore the concept of freedom and self-disposal in the context of divine union. Passage A discusses the freedom of Intellectual-Principle in acting towards the good, while Passage B emphasizes sanctification as the means to union with God, highlighting the freedom and independence from all creatures.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 687
Section 5 5. Are we, however, to make freedom and self-disposal exclusive to Intellectual-Principle as engaged in its characteristic Act, Intellectual-Principle unassociated, or do they belong also to soul acting under that guidance and per…”
Both passages explore the concept of freedom and the highest virtues leading to union with the divine or intellectual principle. Passage A discusses freedom and virtue in the context of Intellectual-Principle and soul, while Passage B emphasizes sanctification as the highest virtue for union with God.