← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 28 of 39 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 4, Section 1|

Wherefore Its Providential character is shown herein: that It preserves the nature of each individual, and, in making provision for the free and independent, it hath respect unto their state, providing, both in general and in 129 particular, according as the nature of those It cares for can receive Its providential benefactions, which are bestowed suitably on each by Its multiform and universal activity. 34. Thus evil hath no being, nor any inherence in things that have being. Evil is nowhere qua evil; and it arises not through any power but through weakness. Even the devils derive their existence from the Good, and their mere existence is good. Their evil is the result of a fall from their proper virtues, and is a change with regard to their individual state, a weakness of their true angelical perfections. And they desire the Good in so far as they desire existence, life, and understanding; and in so far as they do not desire the Good, they desire that which bath no being. And this is not desire, but an error of real desire. 35. By “men who sin knowingly” Scripture means them that are weak in the exercised knowledge 360 360 περὶ τὴν ἄληστον του ἀγαθοῦ γνῶσιν. and performance of Good; and by “them that know the Divine Will and do it not,” 361 361 Luke xii. 47 . it means them that have heard the truth and yet are weak in faith to trust the Good or in action to fulfil it. 362 362 In the previous section D. has maintained that all people ultimately desire the Good. Hence it follows that all sin is due to ignorance; for could we all recognize that which we desire we would follow it. This raises the question: What, then, does Scripture mean by speaking of men who sin knowingly? To this D. replies that wilful sin is wilful ignorance. It is the failure to exercise the knowledge we possess: as when we know a fact which yet is not actually present to our minds. We know (having been taught it) the desirableness of the Good, but we can shut this desirableness out from our minds and refuse to dwell upon it. In such a case we refuse to exercise our knowledge. And some desire not to have understanding in order that they may do good, so great is the warping or the weakness of their will. And, in a word, evil (as we have often said) is weakness, impotence, and deficiency of 130 knowledge (or, at least, of exercised knowledge), or of faith, desire, or activity as touching the Good. Now, it may be urged that weakness should not be punished, but on the contrary should be pardoned. This would be just were the power not within man’s grasp; but if the power is offered by the Good that giveth without stint (as saith the Scripture) that which is needful to each, we must not condone the wandering or defection, desertion, and fall from the proper virtues offered by the Good. But hereon let that suffice which we have already spoken (to the best of our abilities) in the treatise Concerning Justice and Divine Judgment : 363 363 This treatise is lost. a sacred exercise wherein the Truth of Scripture disallowed as lunatic babbling such nice arguments as despitefully and slanderously blaspheme God.
Themes
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

The passage centrally discusses the 'Providential character' of the divine, emphasizing its active preservation and provision for individuals based on their capacity to receive benefactions.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The text defines evil as weakness, impotence, deficiency of knowledge or faith, and a fall from proper virtues rather than a positive being.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The divine is portrayed as actively preserving nature and providing benefactions through multiform activity.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

References to 'It' and the 'Good' suggest a singular transcendent source of providence and virtue.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The desire for the Good implies a movement toward the divine origin from which one has fallen.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

Devils and sinners are described as having fallen from their proper virtues and states of existence derived from the Good.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The statement that 'Evil is nowhere qua evil' suggests a non-dualistic ontology where evil lacks independent being.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 7 (part 1)
p. 29 THE PYTHAGOREAN SENTENCES OF DEMOPHILUS 1. Request not of Divinity such things as, when obtained, you cannot preserve; for no gift of Divinity can ever be taken away; and on this account he does not confer that which you are unable…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divinity, the concept of evil, and the importance of virtue and knowledge. They share similar insights on the role of ignorance in sin and the idea that evil is a result of weakness rather than an inherent power.
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 7 (part 2)
Understand that no dissimulation can be long concealed. 24. The unjust man suffers greater evil while his soul is tormented with a consciousness of guilt, than when his body is scourged with whips. 25. It is by no means safe to discours…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil, the importance of virtue and knowledge, and the relationship between human actions and divine principles. They share a focus on the inner state of the individual and the consequences of moral choices.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 204 (part 1)
Section 17 17. The nature of the Reason-Principle is adequately expressed in its Act and, therefore, the wider its extension the nearer will its productions approach to full contrariety: hence the world of sense is less a unity than is its…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil and the role of the divine principle in human actions. They explore the idea that evil is a result of weakness or ignorance rather than an inherent power, and that individuals are accountable for their actions within a divine order.