← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 66 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter XIX

But neither does the cause [of the energies] of more excellent natures subsist as a certain middle instrument, [77] nor does he who invokes operate through him who prophesies; for to assert these things is impious. And it is much more true to say, that God is all things, is able to effect all things, and that he fills all things with himself, and is alone worthy of sedulous attention, [78] esteem, the energy of reason, and 167 felicitous honour; that which is human being vile, of no account, and ludicrous, when compared with that which is divine. Hence I laugh, when I hear it said, that divinity is spontaneously present with certain persons or things, 168 either through the period of generation, or through other causes. For thus that which is unbegotten will no longer be more excellent, if it is led by the period of generation; nor will it be primarily the cause of all things, if it is coarranged with certain things, according to other causes. These assertions, therefore, are unworthy of the conceptions which we should frame of the Gods, and foreign from the works which are effected in theurgy. [79] But an investigation of this kind suffers the same thing as the multitude suffer, about the fabrication of the universe and providence. For not being able to learn what the mode is in which these are effected, and refusing to ascribe human cares and reasonings to the Gods, they wholly abolish the providential and fabricative energy of divinity. As, therefore, we are accustomed to answer these, that the divine mode of production and providential inspection is very different from that which is human, and which it is not proper wholly to reject through 169 ignorance, as if it had not from the first any subsistence; thus, also, it may be justly contended against you, that all prediction, and the performance of divine works, are the works of the Gods, as they are not effected through other and these human causes, but through such as are alone known to the Gods.
Themes
Anthropomorphismtheology

Attributing human characteristics, emotions, or form to the divine; embodied divine imagery.

The author explicitly condemns attributing human cares and reasonings to the Gods.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The passage centrally argues that God cannot be described through middle instruments or human categories like generation.

All passages →
Cosmic Consciousnessanthropology

A state of awareness transcending ordinary human consciousness, often involving unity with the universe or higher dimensions.

God is described as actively filling all things with himself and being the sole worthy object of attention.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The divine mode of production is described as very different from human understanding and not to be rejected through ignorance.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

The passage defends the concept of providence against those who abolish it due to ignorance of the divine mode of production.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

God is described as unbegotten and not led by periods of generation or other causes.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The mention of 'more excellent natures' implies a hierarchy of being descending from the divine source.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Humanity is characterized as vile and of no account when compared to the divine, implying a lack of true excellence.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text emphasizes that divine works are not effected through human causes but through modes known only to the Gods.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The passage warns against rejecting the divine mode of production due to ignorance, implying esoteric knowledge is necessary.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is portrayed as active, able to effect all things, and worthy of sedulous attention.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The reference to the 'unbegotten' suggests a singular first principle from which all things flow.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

God is described as filling all things with himself and being the sole worthy object of attention.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The author uses the statement that God is 'all things' to emphasize his omnipresence and power.

All passages →
Prayerpraxis

Direct address to the divine, whether petitionary, contemplative, or liturgical; speech and silence offered upward.

The passage begins with a discussion of invoking God through prophets.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The text advocates for sedulous attention to God as the source of all being rather than human causes.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

Humanity is contrasted negatively with the divine, implying a state of exile or deficiency from true excellence.

All passages →
Theurgypraxis

Iamblichean ritual practice that engages the gods directly through consecrated material symbols and actions, on the premise that divine power descends into properly prepared matter — distinct from philosophical contemplation alone.

The passage explicitly discusses the works which are effected in theurgy and defends them against those who abolish providence due to ignorance.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels · 1 contrast
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 1, Section 1e
These mysteries we learn from the Divine Scriptures, and thou wilt find that in well-nigh all the utterances of the Sacred Writers the Divine Names refer in a Symbolical Revelation 72 72 ἐκφαντορικῶς καὶ ὑμνητικῶς. to Its beneficent Emanat…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to the world and human understanding. They emphasize the transcendence and unity of the divine, as well as the limitations of human comprehension in grasping divine activities and manifestations.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 4)
We may say that the world, as we know it, is constituted entirely of forms of heat, or of motion, or of electric conditions, or light, &c., &c. All this is true in so far as it refers to the relations which it bears towards ourselves. All…”
Both passages emphasize the divine as the ultimate source and cause of all things, and they both reject the idea that divine energies or actions are mediated through lesser entities or human causes. They also share a reverence for the divine and a dismissal of human limitations in understanding the divine.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|Third Dialoguea
. Tansillo . There are several varieties of enthusiasts, which may all be reduced to two kinds. While some only display blindness, stupidity, and irrational impetuosity, which tend towards savage madness, others by divine abstraction bec…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the divine and human in the context of mystical experiences. They emphasize the superiority and primacy of the divine over human faculties, though they use different frameworks and terminology.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic II: The Ritual (Éliphas Lévi)|2. Magical EquilibriumdCONTRASTS
Nor is such observance vain, for in the magical work all instruments of art are magnetized by the operator; the air is charged with his perfumes, the fire which he has consecrated is subject to his will, the forces of Nature seem to hear an…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between divine forces and human actions, emphasizing the supremacy of the divine and the limitations of human understanding. They also touch on the idea that human attempts to manipulate divine forces (magic in Passage A, theurgy in Passage B) are misguided or impious.