← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 4 of 6 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 13, Section 1d

And hence, when we speak of the All-Transcendent Godhead as an Unity and a Trinity, It is not an Unity or a Trinity such as can be known by us or any other creature, though to express the truth of Its utter Self-Union and Its Divine Fecundity we apply the titles of “Trinity” and “Unity” to That Which is beyond all titles, expressing under the form of Being That Which is beyond Being. 512 512 Numerical unity is a number among other numbers and so implies differentiation. The Godhead is undifferentiated. But no Unity or Trinity or Number or Oneness or Fecundity or any other thing that either is a creature or can be known to any creature, is able to utter the mystery, beyond all mind and reason, of that Transcendent Godhead which super-essentially surpasses all things. It hath no name, nor can It be grasped by the reason; It dwells in a region beyond us, where our feet cannot tread. Even the title of “Goodness” we do not ascribe to It because we think such a name suitable; but desiring to frame some conception and language about this Its ineffable Nature, we consecrate as primarily belonging to It the Name we most revere. And in this too we shall be in agreement with the Sacred Writers; nevertheless the actual 189 truth must still be far beyond us. Hence we have given our preference to the Negative method, because this lifts the soul above all things cognate with its finite nature, and, guiding it onward through all the conceptions of God’s Being which are transcended by that Being exceeding all Name, Reason, and Knowledge, reaches beyond the farthest limits of the world and there joins us unto God Himself, in so far as the power of union with Him is possessed even by us men. 4. These Intelligible Names we have collected and endeavoured to expound, though falling short not only of the actual meaning thereof (for such a failure even angels would be forced to confess), nor yet merely of such utterance as angels would have given concerning them (for the greatest of those among us who touch these themes are far inferior to the lowest of the angels); nor yet do we merely fall behind the teaching of the Sacred Writers thereon or of the Ascetics, their fellow-labourers, but we fall utterly and miserably behind our own compeers. And hence if our words are true and we have really, so far as in us lies, attained some intellectual grasp of the right way to explain the Names of God, the thanks are due to Him Who is the Creator of all things; granting first the faculty of speech and then the power to use it well. And if any Synonym hath been passed over we must supply and interpret that also by the same methods. And if this treatment is wrong or imperfect, and we have erred from the Truth either wholly or in part, I beg thy loving-kindness to correct my unwilling ignorance, to satisfy with argument my desire for knowledge, to help my insufficient strength and heal my involuntary feebleness; and that, obtaining thy stores partly from thyself and partly from others and wholly from the Good, thou wilt also pass them on to us. And I pray thee be not weary 190 in this kindness to a friend, for thou seest that we have not kept to ourselves any of the Hierarchic Utterances which have been handed down to us, but have imparted them without adulteration both to yourselves and to other holy men, and will continue so to do as long as we have the power to speak and you to hear. So will we do no despite unto the tradition, unless strength fail us for the perception or the utterance of these Truths.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text explicitly advocates for the Negative method to describe God beyond all titles, reason, and knowledge.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

God is described as dwelling in a region beyond us where our feet cannot tread.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The Godhead is characterized as undifferentiated and without parts or composite attributes.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage emphasizes attaining an intellectual grasp of the right way to explain God's Names as a path to union.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The passage describes joining God Himself and reaching beyond the farthest limits of the world to join Him.

All passages →
Numerical Mysticismtheology

Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality.

The text contrasts numerical unity with the undifferentiated Godhead.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage uses the paradox of calling the All-Transcendent Godhead both an Unity and a Trinity.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The goal is to join God Himself in the region beyond us where our feet cannot tread.

All passages →
Sacred Namestheology

Divine names or formulas that carry ontological power, used in prayer, liturgy, or magical practice.

The passage centrally discusses Intelligible Names and their explication as a means to approach the divine.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The text describes the human condition as dwelling in a region beyond us where our feet cannot tread.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The text describes guiding the soul upward through conceptions of God's Being to join Him.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The passage discusses the paradoxical nature of calling the Godhead both an Unity and a Trinity.

All passages →
Related passages · 14 parallels
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1l
All these beings, O Subhûti, will equally remember the Bodhi (the highest Buddha-knowledge), will recite it, and understand it. And why? Because it is not possible, O Subhûti, that this treatise of the Law should be heard by beings of lit…”
Both passages emphasize the incomprehensibility and transcendence of the ultimate reality (Buddha-knowledge in Passage A and the Transcendent Godhead in Passage B). They also highlight the limitations of human understanding and language in describing this ultimate reality.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 2: The Serapeum|Section 1d
Not only, then, is God not understood by all, but both unto the gods and some of the men they out of ignorance do give the name of Good, though they can never either be or become Good. For they are very different from God, while Good can n…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine, emphasizing the transcendence and ineffability of God. They also explore the limitations of human understanding and language in describing the divine, though they come from different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter IV
But the inquiries which follow in the next place, require a more abundant doctrine, in order to their elucidation. At the same time, however, it is necessary to discuss the truth concerning them with brevity. For you inquire “ what efficacy…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine and the limitations of human language in describing the divine. They also emphasize the sacred and mysterious nature of divine names and the importance of tradition in understanding them.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter V
You object, however, “ that he who hears words looks to their signification, so that it is sufficient the conception remains the same, whatever the words may be that are used .” But the thing is not such as you suspect it to be. For if name…”
Both passages discuss the limitations of human language in describing the divine and the importance of sacred names and traditions. They share a common theme of the ineffability of the divine and the need for appropriate language and rituals to approach the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 275 (part 1)
Section 9 9. Clearly a Being of this nature is not the primal existent; there must exist that which transcends it, that Being [the Absolute], to which all our discussion has been leading. In the first place, Plurality is later than Unity.…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the ultimate reality or Godhead as transcending intellectual comprehension and being beyond names and concepts. They both emphasize the ineffable nature of the divine and the limitations of human understanding.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 443
Section 11 11. Thus the Intellectual-Principle, in the act of knowing the Transcendent, is a manifold. It knows the Transcendent in very essence but, with all its effort to grasp that prior as a pure unity, it goes forth amassing successive…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a transcendent, ultimate reality that is beyond human comprehension and naming. They explore the limitations of the intellect in grasping this ultimate principle, which is described as simple, beyond multiplicity, and prior to all things.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 446
Section 14 14. How, then, do we ourselves come to be speaking of it? No doubt we deal with it, but we do not state it; we have neither knowledge nor intellection of it. But in what sense do we even deal with it when we have no hold upon it?…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine, emphasizing that it transcends human understanding and language. They share the theme of the limitations of human knowledge and expression in describing the ultimate reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 691
Section 9 9. If we cannot but speak of Happening we must not halt at the word but look to the intention. And what is that? That the Supreme by possession of a certain nature and power is the Principle. Obviously if its nature were other it…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as transcending being, names, and human comprehension. They emphasize the ineffability and uniqueness of the divine principle, which is beyond all categories and descriptions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 694
Section 12 12. Yet, is not God what He is? Can He, then, be master of being what He is or master to stand above Being? The mind utterly reluctant returns to its doubt: some further considerations, therefore, must be offered: In us the indiv…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine as transcending being and the limitations of human language and understanding in describing the divine. They both emphasize the unity and self-mastery of the divine principle, though within different theological frameworks.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 707 (part 2)
Note, similarly, that, when we speak of this First as Cause, we are affirming something happening not to it but to us, the fact that we take from this Self-Enclosed: strictly we should put neither a This nor a That to it; we hover, as it we…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine, emphasizing that human language and understanding are insufficient to fully grasp or describe the ultimate reality. They both use negative theology to approach the divine, acknowledging the limitations of human concepts and names.
4 more
taoism|Tao Te Ching|Chapter 1
The Tao that can be trodden is not the enduring and unchanging Tao. The name that can be named is not the enduring and unchanging name. (Conceived of as) having no name, it is the Originator of heaven and earth; (conceived of as) having a n…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine, emphasizing that the ultimate reality transcends names and human comprehension. They share a mystical approach to describing the divine as beyond human language and understanding.
western_esoteric|The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Manly P. Hall)|The Tree of the Sephirothh
(See Transcendental Magic .) Of the Great Word, Albert Pike writes: "The True Word of a Mason is to be found in the concealed and profound meaning of the Ineffable Name of Deity, communicated by God to Moses; and which meaning was long lost…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine name and the profound, hidden meaning behind it. They share the concept of the divine being beyond human comprehension and the struggle to express this truth through language.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXI (part 8)
Therefore we must reconcile ourselves to the fact that all attempts to express super-logical relations in our language will seem absurdities, and really can only give hints at that which we wish to express. Thus the formula, A is both A an…”
Both passages discuss the limitations of language in expressing higher truths or the nature of the divine. They emphasize that conventional language and logic are inadequate for describing the super-logical or transcendent aspects of reality.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 14)
How many arguments, how many religious struggles, how much of violence toward the thoughts of others would be rendered unnecessary and impossible if men would only understand that nobody possesses truth, but all are seeking for it, each in…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine, emphasizing that God or the Tao transcends human language and comprehension. They both use negative theology to describe the divine as beyond names, forms, and human understanding.