← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 186 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter XXII (part 14)

How many arguments, how many religious struggles, how much of violence toward the thoughts of others would be rendered unnecessary and impossible if men would only understand that nobody possesses truth, but all are seeking for it, each in his own way. The ideas of Clement of Alexandria about God are highly interesting, and closely approximate to those of the Vedânta, and particularly to the ideas of the Chinese philosophers. The discourse respecting God is the most difficult to handle. For since the first principle of everything is difficult to find out, the absolutely first and the oldest principle, which is the cause of all other things being and p. 289 having been, is difficult to exhibit. For how can that be expressed which is neither genus, nor difference, nor species, nor individual, nor number; nay more, is neither an event, nor that to which an event happens? No one can rightly express this wholly. For on account of his greatness he is ranked as the All and is the Father of the universe. Nor are any parts to be predicated of them. For the one is indivisible, wherefore also it is infinite, not considered with reference to its being without dimensions, and not having a limit. And therefore it is without form and name. And if we name it, we do not do so properly, terming it either the one, or the good, or mind, or Absolute Being, or Father, or God, or Creator, or Lord. We speak not as supplying His name; but for want, we use good names, in order that the mind may have these as points of support, so as not to err in other respects. 1 Among Chinese mystical philosophers our attention is arrested by Lao-Tzu (VI cent. B. C.), and Chuang-Tzu^ (IV cent. B. C.) by the cleanliness of thought and the unusual simplicity with which they express the most profound doctrines of idealism. The Sayings of Lao-Tzu^ The Tao, which can be expressed in words is not the eternal Tao; the name which can be uttered is not its eternal name. 2 Tao eludes the sense of sight, and is therefore called colorless. It eludes the sense of hearing, and is therefore called soundless. It eludes the sense of touch, and is therefore called incorporeal. These three qualities cannot be apprehended, and hence they may be blended into unity. Ceaseless in action, it cannot be named, but returns again to nothingness. We may call it the form of the formless, the image of the image-less, the fleeting and the indeterminable. There is something chaotic, yet complete, which existed before heaven and earth. Oh, how still it is, and formless, standing alone without changing, reaching everywhere, without suffering harm! Its name I know not. To designate it I call it Tao. Endeavoring to describe it, I call it Great. Being Great, it passes on; passing on, it becomes remote; having become remote it returns. The law of Tao is its own spontaneity. Tao in its unchanging aspect has no name. The mightiest manifestations of active force flow from Tao. p. 290 Tao as it exists in the world is like great rivers and seas which receive the streams from the valleys. All-pervading is the Great Tao. It can be at once on the right hand and on the left. Tao is a great square with no angles, a great sound which cannot be heard, a great image with no form. Tao produced Unity; Unity produced Duality; Duality produced Trinity; and Trinity produced all existing objects. He who acts in accordance with Tao, becomes one with Tao. All the world says that my Tao is great, but unlike other teachings. It is just because it is great that it appears unlike other teachings.
Themes
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

Spontaneity and non-striving action imply a letting-go of coercive will.

All passages →
Inner Silencepraxis

The practice of stilling the mind and speech to open receptivity to divine knowledge or presence.

The Tao is characterized by stillness and silence beyond sensory perception.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Tao is described as 'Ceaseless in action' and the Father of the universe, indicating dynamic presence.

All passages →
Rejection Of Hypocrisyethics

Critique of outward religious observance that lacks inner transformation; form without substance.

It critiques religious struggles and violence arising from claims of possessing truth.

All passages →
Sacred Namestheology

Divine names or formulas that carry ontological power, used in prayer, liturgy, or magical practice.

Names like God, Father, and Tao are acknowledged as improper but used as necessary points of support for the mind.

All passages →
Sunyata Emptinesssoteriology

The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.

The Tao is associated with nothingness and formlessness akin to emptiness doctrines.

All passages →
Wu Weipraxis

Effortless action aligned with the spontaneous flow of the Dao; non-coercive, non-striving conduct that yields results without forcing — the sage acts without acting.

The law of Tao is described as spontaneity, implying effortless action aligned with the natural flow.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The passage extensively describes the divine as beyond expression, neither genus nor species, without form or name, and states that naming it is improper.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

[auto] The text states 'Its name I know not' and that the principle eludes sight, hearing, and touch.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The divine is described as having no parts, being indivisible, and without form or dimensions.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage outlines a specific cosmogonic chain: 'Tao produced Unity; Unity produced Duality; Duality produced Trinity; and Trinity produced all existing objects.'

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] The passage suggests that understanding the nature of truth and Tao renders religious struggles unnecessary, implying knowledge over dogma.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

[auto] The text asserts that the eternal Tao cannot be expressed in words and names are used only as points of support for the mind.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The text describes the first principle as 'indivisible,' 'infinite,' and 'the one' from which all else flows.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The text explicitly states that 'He who acts in accordance with Tao, becomes one with Tao,' indicating the goal of merging with the divine.

All passages →
Numerical Mysticismtheology

Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality.

[auto] The creation sequence is defined numerically through Unity, Duality, and Trinity as structural principles of existence.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] Qualities like colorless, soundless, and incorporeal are blended into unity, and the Tao is a 'great square with no angles.'

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The text relies on paradoxical statements such as 'The Tao, which can be expressed in words is not the eternal Tao' and 'great square with no angles.'

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

[auto] The passage describes Tao returning to nothingness and the practitioner becoming one with Tao, implying a return to the origin.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The passage emphasizes the indivisible One, the blending of qualities into unity, and the all-pervading nature of Tao as the single reality.

All passages →
Related passages · 24 parallels
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1s
Because, O Bhagavat, if there were a sphere of worlds, there would exist a belief in matter; and what was preached as a belief in matter by the Tathâgata, that was preached as no-belief by the Tathâgata; and therefore it is called a belief…”
Both passages explore the concept of the ineffable nature of ultimate reality and the limitations of language and concepts in describing it. They share a mystical perspective that emphasizes the transcendence of conventional categories and the importance of non-dualistic understanding.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1d
And hence, when we speak of the All-Transcendent Godhead as an Unity and a Trinity, It is not an Unity or a Trinity such as can be known by us or any other creature, though to express the truth of Its utter Self-Union and Its Divine Fecundi…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine, emphasizing that God or the Tao transcends human language and comprehension. They both use negative theology to describe the divine as beyond names, forms, and human understanding.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1}
In this present treatise we have, to the best of our abilities, celebrated the Good as truly Admirable, as the Beginning and the End of all things, as the Power that embraces them, as That Which gives form to non-existent things, as That wh…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as an ultimate, formless, and ineffable principle that is the source of all existence. They also explore the idea that the divine is beyond human comprehension and can only be approached through indirect means, such as names or symbols.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 5, Section 1h
is attacking the irreligious attitude in science, philosophy, and life. We must seek for all things (including our own personalities) not in themselves but in God. The great defect of Natural Science in the nineteenth century was its fail…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as transcendent, beyond human comprehension, and the source of all things. They emphasize the unity and infinitude of the divine, using similar conceptual frameworks to describe its attributes and relationship to the world.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Mystical Theology|Chapter Ib
They are useful and necessary up to a point, but the Truth lies beyond them and is to be apprehended to a supernatural manner by what later writers call “infused” contemplation. The sum of the whole matter is that God is incomprehensible.…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine and the limitations of human language and understanding in describing the ultimate reality. They share a mystical perspective that emphasizes the transcendence of the divine beyond human concepts and names.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 2)
"Natural man knows nothing about the mystery of the kingdom of God, because he is outside and not within the state of divinity, as is daily proved by the action of the philosophisers who are disputing about the attributes and the will of Go…”
Both passages emphasize the limitations of external reasoning and intellectual understanding in comprehending divine or spiritual truths. They advocate for an internal, experiential knowledge of the divine, which transcends mere intellectual or literal interpretations.
egyptian|The Egyptian Book of the Dead (Papyrus of Ani)|Chapter 8 (part 4)
No man knoweth how to know Him--His name remaineth hidden; His name is a mystery unto His children. His names are innumerable, they are manifold and none knoweth their number--God is truth and He liveth by truth and He feedeth thereon. He…”
Both passages explore the ineffable nature of the divine and the challenges of describing the ultimate reality. They share a mystical perspective on the unity and mystery of God, emphasizing the limitations of human language and understanding in capturing the divine essence.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XXVI
There are many other contentious innovations also, which may be the subject of wonder. But some one may justly be astonished at the contrariety of opinions produced by admitting either that the truth of divination is with enchanters, the wh…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine truth and its manifestation. Iamblichus emphasizes the stability and invariable sameness of divine truth in divination, while the second passage explores the ineffable and transcendent nature of the divine principle (Tao) in Chinese mysticism. Both highlight the limitations of human language and understanding in grasping the divine.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter IV
These things, therefore, having been accurately discussed, the solution of the doubts which you have met with in certain books will be manifest. For the books which are circulated under the name of Hermes contain Hermaic opinions, though th…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the difficulty of expressing the ultimate principle. They share a mystical approach to understanding the transcendent, emphasizing the limitations of human language and reason in describing the divine.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1g
And he attains to the knowledge of them in their highest purity who goes to each of them with the mind alone, not allowing when in the act of thought the intrusion or introduction of sight or any other sense in the company of reason, but wi…”
Both passages explore the concept of the ultimate reality or truth that transcends human senses and language. They emphasize the difficulty of expressing the ineffable nature of this reality and the need for pure, unencumbered thought to approach it.
14 more
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1
I dare say that the simile is not perfect-for I am very far from admitting that he who contemplates existence through the medium of ideas, sees them only "through a glass darkly," any more than he who sees them in their working and effects.…”
Both passages explore the nature of absolute principles or causes (beauty, goodness, greatness in Plato; Tao in the mystical tradition) and the difficulty of expressing or comprehending these ultimate realities. They share a metaphysical inquiry into the fundamental nature of existence.
platonism|Plato: Phaedrus|Section 1z
And if he is ignorant of the true nature of any subject, how can he detect the greater or less degree of likeness in other things to that of which by the hypothesis he is ignorant? Phaedr. He cannot. Soc. And when men are deceived and t…”
Both passages explore the nature of truth and the limitations of human understanding. Plato's dialogue discusses the importance of knowing the true nature of things to avoid deception through resemblances, while the mystical passage discusses the difficulty of expressing the divine and the quest for truth. Both emphasize the complexity and the elusive nature of ultimate reality.
platonism|Plato: Phaedrus|Section 1…
But he who thinks that in the written word there is necessarily much which is not serious, and that neither poetry nor prose, spoken or written, is of any great value, if, like the compositions of the rhapsodes, they are only recited in ord…”
Both passages explore the limitations of written language and the pursuit of higher truth. Plato emphasizes the superiority of oral instruction and the inner knowledge of justice and goodness, while the second passage discusses the ineffable nature of the divine and the limitations of human language in expressing ultimate reality.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1a
BOOK VI SOCRATES - GLAUCON AND thus, Glaucon, after the argument has gone a weary way, the true and the false philosophers have at length appeared in view. I do not think, he said, that the way could have been shortened. I suppose not, I…”
Both passages explore the nature of ultimate reality and the qualities of those who seek to understand it. Plato discusses the philosopher's pursuit of eternal and unchangeable truths, while the mystical traditions describe the ineffable nature of the Tao and the divine, emphasizing the seeker's journey towards understanding.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1b
The true lover of learning then must from his earliest youth, as far as in him lies, desire all truth? Assuredly. But then again, as we know by experience, he whose desires are strong in one direction will have them weaker in others; they…”
Both passages explore the nature of the philosopher or seeker of truth, emphasizing qualities such as harmony, proportion, and the pursuit of knowledge. They also touch on the ineffable nature of ultimate reality, though from different cultural and philosophical perspectives.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1c
And have we not a right to say in his defence, that the true lover of knowledge is always striving after being--that is his nature; he will not rest in the multiplicity of individuals which is an appearance only, but will go on--the keen ed…”
Both passages explore the nature of ultimate reality and the philosopher's or seeker's journey towards understanding it. They share a mystical inclination towards the ineffable and the transcendent, emphasizing the limitations of language and the purity of the seeker's intent.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1f
Now, when he is in this state of mind, if some one gently comes to him and tells him that he is a fool and must get understanding, which can only be got by slaving for it, do you think that, under such adverse circumstances, he will be easi…”
Both passages discuss the challenges and misunderstandings surrounding the pursuit of higher knowledge or philosophy. They highlight the difficulties faced by those who seek truth and the societal obstacles that hinder this pursuit.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1i
No, my friend, and they have seldom, if ever, heard free and noble sentiments; such as men utter when they are earnestly and by every means in their power seeking after truth for the sake of knowledge, while they look coldly on the subtleti…”
Both passages discuss the nature of ultimate reality and the difficulty of expressing it. They also touch on the idea of philosophers or seekers striving for truth and the challenges they face in communicating their insights.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1m
This, however, is not a theme to be treated of in passing only, but will have to be discussed again and again. And so, whether our conclusion be true or false, let us assume all this, and proceed at once from the prelude or preamble to the…”
Both passages explore the nature of ultimate reality and the limitations of human understanding and language in describing it. They share a mystical approach to the divine or absolute, emphasizing the transcendent and ineffable nature of the first principle.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part II (Gli Eroici Furori)|First Dialogueg
Wherefore not only can we never discourse about things divine, but we cannot even think of them without detracting from, rather than adding to the glory of them; so that the best thing to be done with regard to them is, that man, in the pre…”
Both passages explore the ineffable nature of the divine or ultimate reality, emphasizing that it transcends human language and comprehension. They share a mystical perspective that highlights the limitations of human understanding and the need for silence or indirect expression to approach the divine.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part II (Gli Eroici Furori)|Second Dialoguee
Now, it must be said that the outcome of the mind is that alone which is always by it desired, sought for, and embraced, and that which is more enjoyed than anything else, with which it is filled, comforted and becomes better,—that is Truth…”
Both passages explore the nature of ultimate reality or truth, emphasizing its ineffability and transcendence. They share a mystical approach, highlighting the limitations of human language and understanding in describing the divine or ultimate principle.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part II (Gli Eroici Furori)|Third Dialoguee
This alone I will not leave (unsaid) that it is not without reason that the affection of the heart is said to be the infinite sea by the apprehension of the eyes.[X] For the object of the mind being infinite, and no definite object being pr…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the ultimate reality or divine principle, emphasizing that it cannot be fully expressed or named. They also touch on the idea of unity and the manifestation of the divine in the world, showing a conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 124 (part 2)
Where their utterances are like arrows from a bow, we have those who feel it their charge to pronounce what is right and what is wrong.; where they are given out like the conditions of a covenant, we have those who maintain their views, det…”
Both passages explore the nature of the ultimate reality or divine principle that is beyond form and name, and discuss the limitations of human understanding and language in describing it. They also touch on the idea of a governing principle or force that operates beyond human comprehension.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 124 (part 6)
Let us abjure such procedure, and simply rest here 1 . 7. The Tâo at first met with no responsive recognition. Speech at first had no constant forms of expression. Because of this there came the demarcations (of different views). Let m…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of ultimate reality (Tao in Passage A, God in Passage B) and the limitations of language and human understanding in describing it. They also share a focus on the simplicity and spontaneity of the ultimate principle.