Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 143 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon
Chapter XVIII (part 6)
Emotions apparently the same may be united with the very small I's and with the very great and lofty I's; and so the rôle and meaning of such emotions in life may be very different.
The continual shifting of emotions, each of which calls itself I and strives to establish power over man, is the chief obstacle to the establishment of a constant I.
And particularly does this interfere when the emotions are manifesting in and passing through the regions of the psyche connected with a certain kind of self-consciousness and self-assertion.
These are the so-called personal emotions .
The sign of the growth of the emotions is the liberation of them from the personal element, and their sublimation on the higher planes.
The liberation from personal elements augments the cognizing power of the emotions, because the more there are of pseudo-personal elements in emotion the greater the possibility of delusion.
Personal emotion is always partial , always unjust , by reason of the one fact that it opposes itself to all the rest.
Thus the cognitive power of the emotions is greater in proportion as there is less of self-elements in a given emotion, i.e., more consciousness that this emotion is not the I.
We have seen before in studying space and its laws, that the evolution of knowledge consists in a gradual withdrawing from oneself.
Hinton expresses this very well.
He says that only by withdrawing from ourselves do we begin to comprehend the world as it is.
The entire system of mental exercises with colored cubes invented by Hinton aims at the training of consciousness to look at things from other than the pseudo-personal standpoint.
When we study a block of cubes, writes Hinton, (say a cube consisting of 27 lesser cubes) we first of all learn it by starting from a particular cube and axis, and learning how 26 others come with regard to that cube.
.
.
.
We learn the block with regard to this axis, so that we can mentally conceive the disposition of every cube as it comes regarded from one point of view.
Next we suppose ourselves to be in another p.
222 cube at the extremity of another axis; and looking from this axis, we learn the aspect of all the cubes, and so on.
Thus we impress on the feelings what the block of cubes is like from every axis.
In this way we get a knowledge of the block of cubes.
Now, to get the knowledge of humanity, we must study it from the standpoint of the individuals composing it.
The egotist may be compared with the man who knows a cube from one standpoint only.
Those who feel superficially with a great many people, are like those learners who have a slight acquaintance with a block of cubes from many points of view.
Those who have a few deep attachments are like those who know them well from only one or two points of view.
And after all, perhaps the difference between the good and the rest of us, lies rather in the former being aware .
There is something outside them which draws them to it, which they see, while we do not .
1 Just as it is incorrect in relation to oneself to evaluate everything from the standpoint of one emotion , contrasting it with all the rest, so is it correspondingly incorrect in relation to the world and men to evaluate everything from the standpoint of one's own accidental I, contrasting oneself of a given moment with the rest.
Thus the problem of correct emotional knowledge consists in the fact that one shall feel in relation to the world and men from some standpoint other than the personal .
And the broader the circle becomes for which a person feels, the deeper becomes the knowledge which his emotions yield.
But not all emotions are of equal potency in liberating from self-elements .
Certain emotions from their very nature are disruptive , separative, alienating, forcing man to feel himself as individualized and separate; such are hatred, fear, jealousy, pride, envy.
These are emotions of a materialistic order , forcing a belief in matter.
Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.
[auto] The passage describes the 'continual shifting of emotions' and 'accidental I's' as the chief obstacle to a constant I, which is the core definition of mechanical humanity in the Fourth Way tradition.
The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.
[auto] The passage centrally focuses on distinguishing the true constant I from shifting emotional pseudo-personal elements to achieve correct knowledge.