Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 144 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon
Chapter XVIII (part 7)
And there are emotions which are unitive , harmonizing, making man feel himself to be a part of some great whole; such are love, sympathy, friendship, compassion, love of country, love of nature, love of humanity.
These emotions lead man out of the material world and show him the truth of the world of the wondrous.
Emotions of this character liberate him more easily from self-elements than those of the former class.
Nevertheless there can be a quite impersonal pride—the pride in an heroic deed accomplished by another man .
There can even be p.
223 impersonal envy, when we envy a man who has conquered himself, conquered his personal desire to live, sacrificed himself for that which everyone considers to be right and just, but which we cannot bring ourselves to do, cannot even think of doing, because of weakness, of love of life .
There can be impersonal hatred—of injustice, of brute force, anger against stupidity, dullness; aversion to nastiness, to hypocrisy.
These feelings undoubtedly elevate and purify the soul of man and help him to see things which he would not otherwise see.
Christ driving the money-changers out of the temple, or expressing his opinion about the Pharisees, was not entirely meek and mild; and there are cases wherein meekness and mildness are not virtues at all.
Emotions of love, sympathy, pity transform themselves very readily into sentimentality, into weakness; and thus transformed they contribute of course to nescience , i.e., matter .
The difficulty of dividing emotions into categories is increased by the fact that all emotions of the higher order, without exception, can also be personal and then their action partakes of the nature of this class.
______ There is a division of emotions into pure and impure .
We all know this, we all use these words, but understand little of what they mean.
Truly, what does "pure" or "impure" mean with reference to feeling?
Common morality divides, a priori, all emotions into pure and impure according to certain outward signs, just as Noah divided the animals in his ark.
All "fleshly desires" fall into the category of the "impure." In reality indeed, "fleshly desires" are just as pure as is everything in nature.
Nevertheless emotions are pure and impure.
We know very well that there is truth in this classification.
But where is it, and what does it mean?
Only an analysis of emotions from the standpoint of knowledge can give the key to this.
Impure emotion—this is quite the same thing as impure glass, impure water, or impure sound, i.e., emotion which is not pure, but containing sediments, deposits, or echoes of other emotions: IMPURE—MIXED.
Impure emotion gives obscure, not pure knowledge, p.
224 just as impure glass gives a confused image.
Pure emotion gives a clear pure image of that for the knowledge of which it is intended.
This is the only possible decision of the question.
The arrival at this conclusion saves us from the common mistake of moralists who divide arbitrarily all emotion into "moral" and "immoral." But if we try for a moment to separate emotions from their usual moral frames, then we see that matters are considerably simpler, that there are no in their nature pure emotions, nor impure in their nature , but that each emotion will be pure or impure according to whether or not there are admixtures of other emotions in it.
There can be a pure sensuality, the sensuality of the Song of Songs , which initiates into the sensation of cosmic life and gives the power to hear the beating pulse of nature.
And there can be an impure sensuality, mixed with other emotions good or bad from a moral standpoint but equally making muddy the fundamental feeling.
Themes
◆Paradox As Teachingethics
Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.
The text asserts that fleshly desires are pure in nature, contradicting common moral classifications.
Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.
[auto] The passage explicitly states that pure emotion gives a clear image of knowledge intended for it, contrasting this with nescience and common morality.