← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 117 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter XVI (part 4)

1 This is the way a little girl thought, about whom I was reading, if I mistake not, in The Theosophical Review . The girl was sitting near the fireplace, and beside her slept a cat. "Well, the eat is sleeping," the girl reflected, "perhaps she sees in a dream that she is not a cat, but a little girl. And maybe I am not a little girl at all, but a cat, and only see in a dream that I am a little girl . . . ." The next moment the house resounds with a violent cry, and the parents of the little girl have a hard time to convince her that she is not a cat but really a little girl. All this shows that it is necessary to philosophize with a certain amount of skill. Our thought is encompassed by many blind alleys, and positivism, always attempting to apply the rule of proportion, is in itself such a blind alley. ______ Our analysis of phenomena, the relation which we have shown to exist between physical phenomena and those of life and of the psyche, permits us to assert quite definitely that psychic phenomena cannot be a function of physical phenomena—or phenomena of a lower order. We established that the higher cannot be a function of the lower. And this division into higher and lower is also based upon the clear fact of the different potentialities of various orders of phenomena—of the different amount of latent force contained in them (or liberated by them). And of course we have the right to call those phenomena the higher which possess immeasurably greater potentiality, immeasurably more latent force; and to call those the lower which possess less potentiality, less latent force. p. 182 The phenomena of life are the higher in comparison with physical phenomena. Psychic phenomena are the higher , in comparison with the phenomena of life and physical phenomena. Which must be the function of which is clear. Without making a palpable logical mistake we cannot declare life and the psyche to be dependent functionally upon physical phenomena, i.e., to be a result of physical phenomena. The truth is quite the opposite of this: everything forces us to recognize physical phenomena as the result of life, and life (in a biological sense) as the result of some form of psychic life, which is perhaps unknown to us. But of which life, and of which psyche? Here lies the question. Of course it would be absurd to regard our planetary sphere as a function of the vegetable and animal life proceeding upon it —and the visible stellar universe as a function of the human psyche. But nothing of this sort is meant. In the occult understanding of things we speak always of another life and another psyche, the particular manifestation of which is our life and our psyche. It is important to establish the general principle that physical phenomena, being the lower , depend upon the phenomena of life and of the psyche, which are higher . If we admit this principle as established, then it is possible to proceed further. The first question which arises is this: In what relation does the psychic life of man stand to his body and his brain? This question has been answered differently in different times. Psychic life has been regarded as a direct function of the brain (" Thought is the motion of brain substance "), thus of course denying any possibility of thought without the existence of a brain. Then followed an attempt to establish a parallelism between psychic activity and the activity of the brain. But the nature of this parallelism has always remained obscure. Yes, evidently, the brain works parallel to thinking and feeling: an arrestment or a disorder of the activity of the brain brings as a consequence a visible arrestment or disorder of psychic activity. But after all the activity of the brain is merely motion , i.e., an objective phenomenon, whereas the activity of the psyche is a phenomenon objectively undefinable, p. 183 and at the same time more powerful than anything objective. How shall we reconcile all this?
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text describes the activity of the psyche as 'objectively undefinable,' suggesting it transcends ordinary categories of definition.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The passage refers to 'another life and another psyche' which is 'perhaps unknown to us,' indicating a higher reality concealed from ordinary perception.

All passages →
Mechanical Humanityanthropology

Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.

The author critiques ordinary thought and positivism as 'blind alleys,' aligning with the Ouspensky/Gurdjieff concept of limited, mechanical consciousness.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The anecdote about the girl and the cat uses a paradoxical identity confusion to destabilize ordinary assumptions about reality and perception.

All passages →
Tripartite Soulanthropology

Division of the human being into three principles: spirit (pneuma), soul (psyche), and body/matter (hyle or soma).

The text distinguishes between physical phenomena (body), phenomena of life, and psychic phenomena, mapping onto the tripartite structure of body, soul, and spirit.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage centrally argues for a hierarchical dependency where physical phenomena result from life, and life results from psychic phenomena, establishing a chain of higher to lower orders.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 190
Section 3 3. Nor would it be sound to condemn this Kosmos as less than beautiful, as less than the noblest possible in the corporeal; and neither can any charge be laid against its source. The world, we must reflect, is a product of Necessi…”
Both passages explore the relationship between higher and lower phenomena, asserting that higher phenomena (psychic or divine intelligence) are not dependent on lower ones (physical or material). They both argue for a hierarchical structure of reality where the higher influences the lower, rather than the other way around.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 223
Section 2 2. The existence of such a being is no demand of the ordinary man, merely; it is supported by Theologians and, over and over again, by Plato to whom Eros is child of Aphrodite, minister of beautiful children, inciter of human soul…”
Both passages explore the relationship between different levels of existence and phenomena. Passage A discusses the hierarchy of physical, life, and psychic phenomena, asserting that higher phenomena cannot be functions of lower ones. Passage B examines the nature of love and its connection to beauty and the divine, suggesting a hierarchy of aspirations and the primal source of love in the soul's tendency towards pure beauty.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 460
Section 7 7. Consider the act of ocular vision: There are two elements here; there is the form perceptible to the sense and there is the medium by which the eye sees that form. This medium is itself perceptible to the eye, distinct from the…”
Both passages explore the relationship between higher and lower phenomena, questioning the nature of reality and the dependence of one level of existence on another. They both delve into the nature of consciousness and its independence from physical processes.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 569
Section 8 8. The division into elements must, in short, be abandoned, especially in regard to Sensible Substance, known necessarily by sense rather than by reason. We must no longer look for help in constituent parts, since such parts will…”
Both passages explore the relationship between higher and lower orders of phenomena, with Passage A discussing the hierarchy of physical, life, and psychic phenomena, and Passage B discussing the hierarchy of Intellect and Soul. Both texts assert the primacy of higher orders over lower ones.