← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 732 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 699

Section 17 17. Or consider it another way: We hold the universe, with its content entire, to be as all would be if the design of the maker had so willed it, elaborating it with purpose and prevision by reasonings amounting to a Providence. All is always so and all is always so reproduced: therefore the reason-principles of things must lie always within the producing powers in a still more perfect form; these beings of the divine realm must therefore be previous to Providence and to preference; all that exists in the order of being must lie for ever There in their Intellectual mode. If this regime is to be called Providence it must be in the sense that before our universe there exists, not expressed in the outer, the Intellectual-Principle of all the All, its source and archetype. Now if there is thus an Intellectual-Principle before all things, their founding principle, this cannot be a thing lying subject to chance- multiple, no doubt, but a concordance, ordered so to speak into oneness. Such a multiple- the co-ordination of all particulars and consisting of all the Reason-Principles of the universe gathered into the closest union- this cannot be a thing of chance, a thing "happening so to be." It must be of a very different nature, of the very contrary nature, separated from the other by all the difference between reason and reasonless chance. And if the Source is precedent even to this, it must be continuous with this reasoned secondary so that the two be correspondent; the secondary must participate in the prior, be an expression of its will, be a power of it: that higher therefore [as above the ordering of reason] is without part or interval [implied by reasoned arrangement], is a one- all Reason-Principle, one number, a One greater than its product, more powerful, having no higher or better. Thus the Supreme can derive neither its being nor the quality of its being. God Himself, therefore, is what He is, self-related, self-tending; otherwise He becomes outward-tending, other-seeking- who cannot but be wholly self-poised.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The text explicitly states that words are inadequate and attributes like Being must be withheld to describe the First.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

[auto] It emphasizes that no words are adequate and the First is unrelated to all beings, indicating radical concealment.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] It argues the First cannot possess composite attributes or relations, indicating an undivided nature.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] It references the First as the principle from which secondaries and all else are derived.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The passage centrally describes the 'First' as the simple, undivided principle from which all else is derived.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The text mentions eliminating contraries to recognize self-determination in the First.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] It uses contradictory phrasing, such as freedom being present but not as an attribute, to convey transcendence.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] It posits a single source from which the noble and august of all existence is derived.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1c
Emily Brontë: “Every existence would exist in Thee.”) And if all things be conceived as being ultimately unified with each other, then all things taken as a whole are One. 507 507 All things possess the same Super-Essence, and that is why…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, unified principle that underlies all existence. They explore the idea of an ultimate unity from which all things derive their being and order, reflecting a deep conceptual parallel in their mystical perspectives.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 7, Section 1b
(2) Wisdom as a whole = Wisdom embodied in the universe as a whole. (3) Wisdom in each individual instance = Wisdom as shown in the structure of some particular plant or animal, or part of a plant or animal. (1) Is an Emanation; (2) and (…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine wisdom and the Intellectual Principle that underlies the universe. They explore the idea of a supreme, self-poised entity that is the source of all creation and wisdom, emphasizing the unity and perfection of this divine principle.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 1)
p. 33 THE DOCTRINES OF JACOB BOEHME. "Our whole doctrine is nothing else but an instruction to show how man may create a kingdom of light within himself. . . . He in whom this spring of divine power flows, carries within himself the d…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to the world and human understanding. Passage A from Plotinus emphasizes the Intellectual-Principle as the source of all things, while Passage B from Jacob Boehme focuses on the divine principle within man. Both highlight the transcendence and immanence of the divine, though in different contexts and traditions.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 3 (part 4)
The will cannot attain this light, and the more it desires for freedom the greater will be the attraction caused by the desire." ( Six Theosophical Points , i, 38.) "There must be au opposition, for the will desires not to be dark, and this…”
Both passages explore the concept of the First Principle or Absolute One and its relationship to freedom and desire. Passage A discusses the nature of the First as being beyond attributes like freedom, while Passage B delves into the struggle of the will for freedom and the resulting anguish, both touching on the theme of the divine and its manifestations.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 1)
p. 89 CHAPTER IV. CREATION. Everything we see in nature is manifested truth; only we are not able to recognise it as such, unless the truth is manifest within ourselves. God is the supreme, fundamental, universal, self-existent eternal…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation. They explore the idea of a supreme, self-existent entity that is the source of all things, yet distinct from its creations. The passages emphasize the transcendence and uniqueness of the divine principle.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 5 (part 6)
"In the lightning flash, the fourth form of nature, is the origin of life, and it attains perfection in the constancy of the fire. Here, in the object of division, is the p. 111 spirit born, and this spirit can either go backwards and ent…”
Both passages discuss the concept of freedom and the nature of the divine or primordial being. They explore the idea of self-determination and the limitations of human language in describing the ultimate reality, though they come from different mystical traditions.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1i
And being free from jealousy, he desired that all things should be as like himself as they could be. This is in the truest sense the origin of creation and of the world, as we shall do well in believing on the testimony of wise men: God de…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as the source of order and intelligence in the universe, emphasizing the idea of a providential creator who brings about a well-ordered cosmos. They share a conceptual parallel in their exploration of the divine as the origin of all things and the principle of order.