← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 498 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 475

Section 1 1. We have to examine the question whether there exists an ideal archetype of individuals, in other words whether I and every other human being go back to the Intellectual, every [living] thing having origin and principle There. If Socrates, Socrates' soul, is external then the Authentic Socrates- to adapt the term- must be There; that is to say, the individual soul has an existence in the Supreme as well as in this world. If there is no such permanent endurance and what was Socrates may with change of time become another soul and be Pythagoras or someone else- then the individual Socrates has not that existence in the Divine. But if the Soul of the individual contains the Reason-Principles of all that it traverses, once more all men have their [archetypic] existence There: and it is our doctrine that every soul contains all the Reason-Principles that exist in the Kosmos: since then the Kosmos contains the Reason-Principles not merely of man, but also of all individual living things, so must the Soul. Its content of Reason-Principles, then, must be limitless, unless there be a periodical renovation bounding the boundlessness by the return of a former series. But if [in virtue of this periodic return] each archetype may be reproduced by numerous existents, what need is there that there be distinct Reason-Principles and archetypes for each existent in any one period? Might not one [archetypal] man suffice for all, and similarly a limited number of souls produce a limitless number of men? No: one Reason-Principle cannot account for distinct and differing individuals: one human being does not suffice as the exemplar for many distinct each from the other not merely in material constituents but by innumerable variations of ideal type: this is no question of various pictures or images reproducing an original Socrates; the beings produced differ so greatly as to demand distinct Reason-Principles. The entire soul-period conveys with it all the requisite Reason-Principles, and so too the same existents appear once more under their action. There is no need to baulk at this limitlessness in the Intellectual; it is an infinitude having nothing to do with number or part; what we may think of it as its outgoing is no other than its characteristic Act.
Themes
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The text uses the structure of the Soul to understand the higher Intellect, reflecting a correspondence between levels.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

The Soul is described as a 'double light' with an 'intellective phase' representing purer light.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage defines 'true intellection' as possessing the object integrally as itself, a form of direct knowledge.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

The passage describes an 'intellective light' within the Soul that corresponds to its object.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The author instructs to 'proceed upwards from the Soul' to understand the higher intellective principle.

All passages →
Active Contemplationpraxis

A form of meditation that uses imagery, imagination, or symbolic thought rather than purely empty stillness.

[auto] The passage describes intellection as an active state of self-conversing and internal possession.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] It describes the primally intellective principle as essentially a unity without distinction of being or parts.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] It distinguishes between principles based on their removal from duality and proximity to pure unity.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

[auto] It emphasizes the internal possession of the object within the intellective principle rather than external perception.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] It identifies a primally intellective principle that is essentially a simple unity from which intellection flows.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The passage describes the merging of subject and object within the intellect as a profound internal possession.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] It posits a unity in duality where the distinction between subject and object is resolved into one essence.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] It presents the concept of a double form remaining essentially a unity as a profound metaphysical truth.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

[auto] The passage centrally defines self-intellection where the subject is its own object and takes the double form while remaining essentially a unity.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The text argues that true intellection requires the perceiving principle and perceived object to be one substance.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 6 (part 8)
They are fire-flames, illumined by the light of God, but we attain the great fountain of meekness and love which is welling up within the holy essentiality of God." 1 ( Menschwerdung , i. 5.) Man comprises all three principles: the princip…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and duality within the self and the divine. Plotinus discusses the primal intellection as a unity in duality, while the second passage describes the human as a composite of three principles, reflecting a similar interplay between unity and multiplicity.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 7 (part 6)
2.) There existed in man also the third principle, wherein resides sensual desire. He was not endowed with this principle for the purpose of surrendering himself to it, but that he might introduce it into the light of God, and glorify Him…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and duality within the human experience and divine connection. Plotinus discusses the primal intellection as a unity within duality, while the second passage describes the human as a mixed individuality striving for harmony and unity with the divine.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 9 (part 1)
p. 180 CHAPTER IX. GENERATION. "Let every Brahman, with fixed attention, consider all nature, both visible and invisible, as existing in the Divine Spirit. For when he contemplates the boundless universe in the Divine Spirit, he cannot…”
Both passages explore the concept of the divine origin and nature of individual souls, emphasizing the eternal and archetypal aspects of existence within a higher, divine realm. They share a mystical perspective on the relationship between the individual soul and the divine, though they come from different traditions.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the divine and individual existence. Passage A discusses the archetypal existence of individuals in the Intellectual realm, while Passage B describes the penetration and illumination of the soul by the divine Word, highlighting the interconnectedness of the divine and human. Both texts deal with the concept of individual souls having a connection to a higher, divine reality.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Front Matter, p. 4 (part 4)
Hence according to his theology there are two worlds, the intelligible and the sensible. Hence too his three demiurgic principles: Jovial, Dionysiacal, and Adonical, Δΐι#, ( ) Διονυσιακὴ, Αδωναϊκὴ, from whence many orders and differences o…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a primal intellect or divine intellect that is the source of all motion and life. They also explore the hierarchy of being, from the highest divine intellect to the soul and then to the body, emphasizing the participation of lower levels of being in the higher.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 3)
These Eleatic ideas—namely that there is and there can be only One Absolute Being, infinite., unchangeable, without a second, without parts and passions—are the same ideas which underlie the Upanishads and have been fully worked out in the…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the individual soul and the divine, with Passage A discussing the existence of individual souls in the Intellectual realm and Passage B discussing the unity of the soul with the divine in various religious traditions. Both texts delve into the nature of the soul's connection to the divine, albeit from different philosophical and religious perspectives.