← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 286 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 275 (part 1)

Section 9 9. Clearly a Being of this nature is not the primal existent; there must exist that which transcends it, that Being [the Absolute], to which all our discussion has been leading. In the first place, Plurality is later than Unity. The Intellectual-Principle is a number [= the expression of a plurality]; and number derives from unity: the source of a number such as this must be the authentically One. Further, it is the sum of an Intellectual-Being with the object of its Intellection, so that it is a duality; and, given this duality, we must find what exists before it. What is this? The Intellectual-Principle taken separately, perhaps? No: an Intellect is always inseparable from an intelligible object; eliminate the intelligible, and the Intellectual-Principle disappears with it. If, then, what we are seeking cannot be the Intellectual-Principle but must be something that rejects the duality there present, then the Prior demanded by that duality must be something on the further side of the Intellectual-Principle. But might it not be the Intelligible object itself? No: for the Intelligible makes an equally inseparable duality with the Intellectual-Principle. If, then, neither the Intellectual-Principle nor the Intelligible Object can be the First Existent, what is? Our answer can only be: The source of both. What will This be; under what character can we picture It? It must be either Intellective or without Intellection: if Intellective it is the Intellectual-Principle; if not, it will be without even knowledge of itself- so that, either way, what is there so august about it? If we define it as The Good and the wholly simplex, we will, no doubt, be telling the truth, but we will not be giving any certain and lucid account of it as long as we have in mind no entity in which to lodge the conception by which we define it. Yet: our knowledge of everything else comes by way of our intelligence; our power is that of knowing the intelligible by means of the intelligence: but this Entity transcends all of the intellectual nature; by what direct intuition, then, can it be brought within our grasp? To this question the answer is that we can know it only in the degree of human faculty: we indicate it by virtue of what in ourselves is like it. For in us, also, there is something of that Being; nay, nothing, ripe for that participation, can be void of it. Wherever you be, you have only to range over against this omnipresent Being that in you which is capable of drawing from It, and you have your share in it: imagine a voice sounding over a vast waste of land, and not only over the emptiness alone but over human beings; wherever you be in that great space you have but to listen and you take the voice entire- entire though yet with a difference. And what do we take when we thus point the Intelligence? The Intellectual-Principle in us must mount to its origins: essentially a thing facing two ways, it must deliver itself over to those powers within it which tend upward; if it seeks the vision of that Being, it must become something more than Intellect. For the Intellectual-Principle is the earliest form of Life: it is the Activity presiding over the outflowing of the universal Order- the outflow, that is, of the first moment, not that of the continuous process.
Themes
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

The text identifies Reason-Principles as the cause that makes lives thoughts, functioning as the ordering principle of existence.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The description of the Supreme as 'a Seeing that lives, not an object of vision' presents a paradoxical formulation of divine reality.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The identity of Knower and Known implies that knowing the divine principle is equivalent to knowing one's own true nature.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The text notes that the Whither is less good than the Whence, indicating a degradation or distance from the original Unity.

All passages →
Theosis Deificationsoteriology

The doctrine — central to Eastern Orthodox and Maximian theology — that the human person is progressively transformed into a partaker of the divine nature by grace, not merely justified or united in passing ecstasy.

The Soul is described as rising to become one with the Intellectual-Principle, effectively partaking in the divine nature.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The text negates diversity and parts in the Supreme ('we cannot stop at a principle containing separate parts'), using negation to describe the higher principle.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The text states that in the Intellectual-Principle and Supreme 'no distinction exists between Being and Knowing' and there are no separate parts.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The text describes a structured progression from Nature to Soul to Intellectual-Principle to the Supreme, implying a hierarchical order of being.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] The passage focuses on 'Contemplation' where the object of knowledge becomes identical with the knower, indicating direct experiential knowledge.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

[auto] It states that in the advanced Soul 'objects of knowledge... are close to identity with their container', suggesting the divine is internal.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

[auto] The Supreme is described as 'a Seeing that lives', characterizing the divine as active and living rather than a static object.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The 'Supreme' is described as an entity where distinctions vanish and no separate parts exist, fitting the definition of a simple first principle.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The passage explicitly describes the 'complete identity of Knower and Known' and objects becoming 'one thing with them' in advanced contemplation.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The passage states that in the Intellectual-Principle 'no distinction exists between Being and Knowing', dissolving binary oppositions.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

[auto] The 'advancing stages of Contemplation rising' implies a journey back up the hierarchy toward the Intellectual-Principle and Supreme.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

[auto] The passage outlines 'advancing stages of Contemplation rising from that in Nature, to that in the Soul and thence again to that in the Intellectual-Principle'.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The core argument is that in the Supreme 'the two are one' and there is 'complete identity of Knower and Known', emphasizing non-duality.

All passages →
Related passages · 15 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1c
Emily Brontë: “Every existence would exist in Thee.”) And if all things be conceived as being ultimately unified with each other, then all things taken as a whole are One. 507 507 All things possess the same Super-Essence, and that is why…”
Both passages explore the concept of a transcendent, unitary source of all existence. They discuss the nature of the One or the Absolute, which is beyond intellectual comprehension and is the source of all plurality and multiplicity. The passages share a mystical approach to understanding the ultimate reality.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1d
And hence, when we speak of the All-Transcendent Godhead as an Unity and a Trinity, It is not an Unity or a Trinity such as can be known by us or any other creature, though to express the truth of Its utter Self-Union and Its Divine Fecundi…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the ultimate reality or Godhead as transcending intellectual comprehension and being beyond names and concepts. They both emphasize the ineffable nature of the divine and the limitations of human understanding.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1i
The Godhead is not a Whole because it is indivisible, nor a Part because there is nothing, on the ultimate plane, outside It. Yet It is a Whole because It includes the true existence of all things, and is Partitive because It contains the…”
Both passages discuss the nature of a transcendent, ultimate reality that is beyond intellect and being. They explore the idea of a unity that precedes and encompasses all other forms of existence, using similar conceptual frameworks to describe the ineffable nature of the divine.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1a
CHAPTER IV Concerning ” Good ,” ” Light ,” ” Beautiful ,” “ Desire ,” ” Ecstasy ,” “ Jealousy .” Also that Evil is neither existent nor Sprung from anything existent nor inherent in existent things . 1. Now let us consider the name of “Go…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a transcendent, supreme being that is the source of all existence and goodness. They explore the nature of this being as beyond intellect and intelligible objects, emphasizing its simplicity and the way it extends its essence to all things.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 1)
p. 89 CHAPTER IV. CREATION. Everything we see in nature is manifested truth; only we are not able to recognise it as such, unless the truth is manifest within ourselves. God is the supreme, fundamental, universal, self-existent eternal…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the ultimate reality or divine being, emphasizing its transcendence and the difficulty of comprehending it. They also explore the hierarchy of existence and the relationship between the divine and the created world.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 9 (part 1)
p. 180 CHAPTER IX. GENERATION. "Let every Brahman, with fixed attention, consider all nature, both visible and invisible, as existing in the Divine Spirit. For when he contemplates the boundless universe in the Divine Spirit, he cannot…”
Both passages discuss the unity of the divine and the soul, and the process of contemplation or desire leading to a higher state of being. They explore the concept of the divine as both the knower and the known, and the soul's journey towards union with the divine.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 1)
p. 224 CHAPTER XI. INCARNATION—THE CELESTIAL VIRGIN. The doctrine of the incarnation of Christ, or, to express it in other words, of the awakening of the germ of divine self-knowledge in man, is so grand, that it is impossible to form a…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and the relationship between the divine and the known, with Plotinus discussing the Intellectual-Principle and Boehme discussing the incarnation of Christ as a means of divine self-knowledge. Both emphasize the unity and interconnectedness of higher and lower realms.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the divine and the soul, emphasizing a unity or penetration of the divine into the soul. They explore the nature of the highest reality and its interaction with lower realms, though from different mystical traditions.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 11: The Hymn|Section 1c
It must, then, be that such a one as this must be some one who's wholly One. 9. For as the many motions of them [all] are different, and as their bodies are not like, yet has one speed been ordered for them all, it is impossible that ther…”
Both passages explore the unity and plurality of the divine and the nature of existence, contemplation, and the relationship between the knower and the known. They share a mystical focus on the oneness of the ultimate reality and the process of emanation or creation.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter I (part 4)
New forms of knowledge. The ideas of Plotinus. Different forms of consciousness. Sleep (the potential state of consciousness). Dreams (consciousness en-closed in itself, reflected from itself). Waking consciousness (dualistic sensation…”
Both passages explore the concept of different forms of consciousness and the progression towards higher states of awareness. They discuss the unity of the knower and the known, and the transcendence of ordinary logic to understand higher realities.
5 more
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter I (part 1)
p. 8 p. 9 TERTIUM ORGANUM p. 10 "I have called this system of higher logic Tertium Organum because for us it is the third canon —third instrument— of thought after those of Aristotle and Bacon. The first was Organon , the second, Novum…”
Both passages explore the nature of knowledge and reality, with Passage A discussing the limits of human understanding and the need to distinguish between known and unknown, while Passage B delves into the unity of knower and known in the Intellectual-Principle. Both texts grapple with the fundamental questions of existence and consciousness, albeit from different philosophical and mystical perspectives.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVII (part 10)
By ourselves we are simply out of relation with each other, for we are both of us there, and different from each other, which is a positive relation. What we are without knowing, it knows that we are. It is as if the total universe of inn…”
Both passages explore the idea of a higher, unifying principle that encompasses and integrates individual experiences and knowledge. Passage A discusses the concept of an earth-soul that absorbs individual perceptions, while Passage B describes the Intellectual-Principle where the Knower and Known are unified.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXI (part 7)
_______ Where are our "idols?" From what shall we liberate ourselves in order to pass to an understanding of the multi-dimensional world? First of all we must get rid of our assurance that we see and sense that which exists in reality, and…”
Both passages explore the limitations of human perception and logic in understanding reality. Passage A discusses the need to move beyond dualistic logic to comprehend a multi-dimensional world, while Passage B describes the unity of the Intellectual-Principle and the limitations of duality in understanding higher realities.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXIII (part 9)
Further, it should be noted, as the possession of concepts implies the possession of language, so the possession of concepts and language (which are in reality two aspects of the same thing) implies the possession of self-consciousness. Al…”
Both passages discuss the evolution of consciousness and the transition to a higher state of awareness. Passage A describes the progression from conceptual to supra-conceptual intellect, leading to cosmic consciousness, while Passage B discusses the progression from contemplation in nature to contemplation in the Intellectual-Principle, leading to a unity of Knower and Known.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXIII (part 10)
The mind becomes overcrowded (as it were) with concepts and these are constantly becoming larger, more numerous and more and more complex; some day (the conditions being all favorable) the fusion, or what might be called the chemical union,…”
Both passages discuss the evolution of consciousness and the attainment of a higher state of awareness. Passage A describes the development of cosmic consciousness through the fusion of concepts and moral elements, while Passage B discusses the progression of contemplation leading to complete identity of Knower and Known in the Intellectual-Principle.