Select Works of Plotinus · 287 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor
Select Works, Section 275 (part 2)
In its character as Life, as emanation, as containing all things in their precise forms and not merely in the agglomerate mass- for this would be to contain them imperfectly and inarticulately- it must of necessity derive from some other Being, from one that does not emanate but is the Principle of Emanation, of Life, of Intellect and of the Universe.
For the Universe is not a Principle and Source: it springs from a source, and that source cannot be the All or anything belonging to the All, since it is to generate the All, and must be not a plurality but the Source of plurality, since universally a begetting power is less complex than the begotten.
Thus the Being that has engendered the Intellectual-Principle must be more simplex than the Intellectual-Principle.
We may be told that this engendering Principle is the One-and-All.
But, at that, it must be either each separate entity from among all or it will be all things in the one mass.
Now if it were the massed total of all, it must be of later origin than any of the things of which it is the sum; if it precedes the total, it differs from the things that make up the total and they from it: if it and the total of things constitute a co-existence, it is not a Source.
But what we are probing for must be a Source; it must exist before all, that all may be fashioned as sequel to it.
As for the notion that it may be each separate entity of the All, this would make a self-Identity into a what you like, where you like, indifferently, and would, besides, abolish all distinction in things themselves.
Once more we see that this can be no thing among things but must be prior to all things.
Related passages · 9 parallels
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1b
“Plotinus says the Godhead is indivisibly divided.
doth not leave Its own Unity, but, even in the act of going forth to all things, remains entirely within Itself through the excess of that all-transcendent Unity: concerning these things ‘t…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, transcendent source or principle that is the origin of all things. They explore the nature of this principle as being simple, unified, and prior to all other beings, which is a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1c
“Emily Brontë: “Every existence would exist in Thee.”) And if all things be conceived as being ultimately unified with each other, then all things taken as a whole are One.
507 507 All things possess the same Super-Essence, and that is why…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, transcendent principle that is the source of all existence and unity. They explore the idea of a simple, indivisible source that precedes and encompasses all things, though they use different terminology and contexts.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1k
“Indeed, He is not an unity in this sense, and doth not participate in unity nor possess it; 224 224 These two phrases well express the meaning of the title “Beyond things and supernally infusing Unity” (ὑπερηνωμένη), which I have generally…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, undifferentiated source or principle from which all things emanate or derive. They explore the nature of this principle as being beyond multiplicity and unity as commonly understood, emphasizing its primacy and simplicity.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1k
“and all things are moved by a longing for the Beautiful and Good, to accomplish every outward work and form every act of will.
And true reasoning will also dare to affirm that even the Creator of all things Himself yearneth after all thing…”
Both passages explore the concept of a transcendent, ultimate principle that is the source of all things. Passage A discusses the One as the principle of emanation, while Passage B describes the Creator's yearning and excess of goodness as the driving force behind creation. Both emphasize the primacy and simplicity of the ultimate principle.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1p
“let us now yet further resume and compact them all together into the one and concentrated Yearning which is the Father of them all, and let us collect together into two kinds their general desiderative 109 powers, over which the entire mast…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, simple, and incomprehensible principle that is the source of all things. They both emphasize the idea that this principle is prior to and more fundamental than the universe and all its contents.
◆egyptian|The Egyptian Book of the Dead (Papyrus of Ani)|Chapter 43 (part 70)
“He giveth life to man, He breatheth the breath of life into his nostrils--God is father and mother, the father of fathers, and the mother of mothers.
He begetteth, but was never begotten; He produceth, but was never produced; He begat hims…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, singular being that encompasses all things and is the principle of creation. Passage A focuses on the Intellectual-Principle in Neoplatonism, while Passage B discusses the monotheistic beliefs of ancient Egyptians, but both share the idea of a unified, all-encompassing divine principle.
◆greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn X (part 1)
“X.
TO PAN * The FUMIGATION from VARIOUS ODORS I Call strong Pan, the substance of the whole, Etherial, marine, earthly, general soul, Immortal fire; for all the world is thine, And all are parts of thee, O pow'r divine.
p.
131 Come, bles…”
Both passages discuss the nature of a divine principle that encompasses all things and serves as the source and sustainer of the universe. They share the idea of a unifying force that connects and governs the cosmos, though they come from different mystical traditions.
◆hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 9: The Decalogue|Section 1c
“This is God's sense-and-thought, ever to move all things.
And never time shall be when e'en a whit of things that are shall cease; and when I say "a whit of things that are", I mean a whit of God.
For thigs that are, God hath; nor aught […”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as the source and essence of all things, emphasizing the unity and interconnectedness of existence. They explore the idea that the divine is not separate from creation but is the very substance and principle of all that is.
◆hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 11: The Hymn|Section 1c
“It must, then, be that such a one as this must be some one who's wholly One.
9.
For as the many motions of them [all] are different, and as their bodies are not like, yet has one speed been ordered for them all, it is impossible that ther…”
Both passages discuss the nature of a universal principle that encompasses all things. Plotinus describes the Intellectual-Principle as a universal being that includes all things, while Hermes Trismegistus discusses the One God as the creator and sustainer of all life, emphasizing the unity and singularity of this principle.