← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 43 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter Xb

For if these are not true, but other things are so which have a real existence, thus also in the appearances of spirits, they seem to be such as things which are true beings; at the same time they participate of falsehood and deception, in the same manner as the forms which present themselves to the view in mirrors; and thus vainly attract the mind about things which never take place in any of the more excellent genera. These phantasms, likewise, will consist in deceptive perversions. For that which is an imitation of [real] being, and is an obscure assimilation, and becomes the cause of deception, pertains to no one of the true and clearly existing genera. But the Gods, indeed, and those powers that follow the 107 Gods, reveal true images of themselves, but by no means extend phantasms of themselves, such as exist in water, or in mirrors. For on what account should they exhibit these? Shall we say, as bringing with them an indication of their own essence and power? This, however, is by no means the case. For these phantasms become the cause of deception to those that believe in them, and withdraw the spectators from the true knowledge of the Gods. Shall we say, then, that it is because they afford a certain utility to those that behold them? But what advantage can be derived from falsehood? If, therefore, this is not the case, may it not be natural to divinity to extend a phantasm from itself? But how can that which is firmly established in itself, and which is the cause of essence and truth, produce in a foreign seat a certain deceitful imitation of itself? By no means, therefore, does divinity either transform himself into phantasms, nor extend these from himself to other things, but emits, by illumination, true representations of himself, in the true manners of souls. Conformably to this, also, the attendants of the Gods are emulous of the self-visible truth of the Gods. But that which you now say, “ that it is common to Gods and dæmons, and the rest of the more excellent genera, to produce fictitious images, and to speak boastingly 108 of themselves ,” confounds all the genera of superior beings in each other, and leaves no difference whatever between them. For thus all things will be common to them, and nothing singularly excellent will be given to transcendent natures. It will, therefore, be more just to ask, in opposition to you, in what will the genus of the Gods be superior to that of dæmons? These genera, however, have nothing in common, nor is the communion between them phantastic, nor is it fit from such natures as are last, and from the errors which take place in them, to estimate first essences, and the true impressions of forms which are in them. For by thus thinking concerning these essences, we shall think justly, and in a way pleasing to the Gods.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text describes God as firmly established in itself and beyond the production of phantasms.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

A clear distinction is drawn between true beings/Gods and deceptive phantasms/illusions.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The Gods reveal themselves through true images rather than extending deceptive phantasms.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

The passage explicitly states that Gods emit 'true representations of himself, in the true manners of souls' by illumination.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Phantasms are described as deceptive perversions and errors that lack true essence.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage emphasizes 'true knowledge of the Gods' and warns against being deceived by phantasms.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The text discusses the nature of appearances versus true reality in mystical contexts.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Gods are described as active powers that reveal themselves through images and emit illumination.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The attendants of the Gods are described as emulous of the self-visible truth of the Gods.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text uses apparent contradictions like Gods producing deception to reveal higher truths.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The goal is to withdraw spectators from deceptive images toward the true knowledge of the Gods.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The text concludes that thinking justly about these essences will be pleasing to the Gods and leads to true knowledge.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels · 1 contrast
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 5 (part 2)
It ought to be kept in mind that "myths" are not "fables." Myths are representations of actualities clothed in a fabulous form. Their kernel is true, even if the shell in which it is clothed is an illusion. "There are seven principal qual…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine beings and their manifestations. Iamblichus emphasizes the true representations of the Gods versus deceptive phantasms, while the second passage describes the hierarchical structure and unity of angels, highlighting their true and harmonious nature. Both texts aim to clarify the authentic nature of divine entities and their interactions with the world.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn LXXV. THE MUSES (part 4)
Besides this, it teaches the circuits of the soul, its immortality and various powers; explains to mortals many names of an incorporeal nature, and produces many probable Dogmata respecting corporeal substance. The Athenian guest (in Plato…”
Both passages discuss the nature of appearances and illusions, contrasting them with true divine or spiritual realities. They both emphasize the deceptive nature of phantasms or imitations and the importance of discerning true knowledge from false appearances.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn LXXV. THE MUSES (part 5)
Again, the Athenian guest speaks separately of the conjectural kind, where he treats of that music which does not propose to itself pleasure, but a true and most similar imitation of its exemplar, as in the second book of Laws. Indeed, Soc…”
Both passages discuss the concept of imitation and its relationship to truth and deception. They explore how certain representations can be misleading and how true knowledge or divine essence differs from these deceptive imitations.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|5. The Pentagrama
GEBURAH ECCE HEREUNTO we have exposed the magical dogma in its more arid and abstruse phases; now the enchantments begin; now we can proclaim wonders and reveal most secret things. The Pentagram signifies the domination of the mind over th…”
Both passages discuss the nature of true and false appearances or visions, emphasizing the distinction between genuine divine revelations and deceptive phantasms or reflections. They both explore the idea that true knowledge and perception come from higher, divine sources, while false impressions lead one away from truth.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|13. NecromancyeCONTRASTS
There are evocations of intelligence, evocations of love and evocations of hate; but, once more, there is no proof whatsoever that spirits leave the higher spheres to communicate with us: the opposite, as a fact is more probable. We evoke…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine appearances and the potential for deception or misrepresentation. Iamblichus argues that divine beings do not deceive but reveal true representations, while the 13. Necromancye passage discusses the potential for misrepresentation and the influence of human perceptions on divine appearances. Both explore the theme of the authenticity of divine manifestations.