← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 3 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter III

In the first place, therefore, you say, “ it must be granted that there are Gods .” Thus to speak, however, is not right on this subject. For an innate knowledge of the Gods is coexistent with our very essence; and this knowledge is superior to all judgment and deliberate choice, and subsists prior to reason and demonstration. It is also counited from the beginning with its proper cause, and is consubsistent with the essential tendency of the soul to the good . If, indeed, it be requisite to speak the truth, the contact with divinity is not knowledge. For knowledge is in a certain respect separated [from its object] by otherness . [24] But prior to the knowledge, which as one thing knows another, is the uniform connexion with divinity, and which is suspended from the Gods, is spontaneous and inseparable from them. Hence, it is not proper to grant this, as 24 if it might not be granted, nor to admit it as ambiguous (for it is always unically established in energy); nor are we worthy thus to explore it, as if we had sufficient authority to approve or reject it. For we are comprehended in it, or rather we are filled by it, and we possess that very thing which we are, [or by which our essence is characterized] in knowing the Gods. I shall likewise say the same thing to you, concerning the more excellent genera that follow the Gods, I mean dæmons, heroes, and undefiled souls. [25] For it is necessary to understand respecting these, that there is always in them one definite reason of essence, and to remove from them the indefiniteness and instability of the human condition. It is likewise requisite to separate from them that inclination 25 to one side of an argument rather than another, arising from the equilibrium of a reasoning process. For a thing of this kind is foreign from the principles of reason and life, and rather tends to secondary natures, and to such things as pertain to the power and contrariety of generation. But it is necessary that the more excellent genera should be apprehended uniformly. The connascent perception, therefore, of the perpetual attendance of the Gods, will be assimilated to them. Hence, as they have an existence which is always invariably the same, thus also the human soul is conjoined to them by knowledge, according to a sameness of subsistence; by no means pursuing through conjecture, or opinion, or a syllogistic process, all which originate in time, an essence which is above all these, but through the pure and blameless intellections which the soul received from eternity from the Gods, becoming united to them. You, however, seem to think, that there is the same knowledge of divine natures as of any thing else, and that one thing, rather than another, may be granted from opposites, in the same manner as it is usual to do in dialectic discussions. There is, however, no similitude whatever between the two kinds of knowledge. For the knowledge of divine natures is different from that of other 26 things, and is separated from all opposition. It likewise neither subsists in being now granted, or in becoming to be, but was from eternity, uniformly consubsistent with the soul. And thus much I say to you concerning the first principle in us, from which it is necessary those should begin who speak or hear any thing about the natures that are superior to us.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text describes divine knowledge as superior to judgment and prior to reason, transcending ordinary categories.

All passages →
Cosmic Sympathycosmology

The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.

The soul is described as conjoined to the Gods by a uniform connexion that suspends from them.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The passage emphasizes that divine knowledge is not granted but consubsistent and suspended from the Gods.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The text mentions dæmons, heroes, and undefiled souls as genera following the Gods in a hierarchical order.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage centrally defines divine knowledge as innate, superior to judgment, and consubstantial with the soul prior to reason.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

Divine knowledge is described as innate and coexistent with the soul's essence.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

The text states that divine knowledge is coexistent with our very essence and filled by it.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Gods are described as active and suspended from the soul rather than an abstract principle.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The passage describes the soul being filled by the divine knowledge and conjoined to the Gods through a uniform connexion.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The author uses contradictions such as 'knowledge is separated... but prior to reason' to destabilize ordinary understanding.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The soul's union with the Gods implies a return to its divine origin.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The text asserts that an innate knowledge of the Gods is coexistent with our very essence and that knowing the Gods constitutes knowing ourselves.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The passage implies a movement from human reasoning to divine knowledge as a higher state.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text asserts that the soul is filled by the very thing which it is and consubstantial with the Gods.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels · 1 contrast
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 7, Section 1c
And in the same way we attribute lack of Reason to Him that is above Reason, and Imperfectibility to Him that is above and before Perfection; and Intangible and Invisible Darkness we attribute to that Light which is Unapproachable because I…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine knowledge and its relationship to creation. They emphasize that divine knowledge is not derived from external sources but is inherent and unified, encompassing all things within a single, transcendent understanding.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Mystical Theology|Chapter Ib
They are useful and necessary up to a point, but the Truth lies beyond them and is to be apprehended to a supernatural manner by what later writers call “infused” contemplation. The sum of the whole matter is that God is incomprehensible.…”
Both passages discuss the incomprehensibility of the divine and the limitations of human knowledge in understanding it. They emphasize the need for a higher, more direct form of knowledge or contemplation that transcends rational thought and dialectical processes.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Mystical Theology|Chapter IIIa
What are the affirmative expressions respecting God, and what are the negative. Now I have in my Outlines of Divinity set forth those conceptions which are most proper to the affirmative method, and have shown in what sense God’s holy natu…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine and the limitations of human language and understanding in describing it. They share a mystical approach, emphasizing the transcendent and ineffable aspects of the divine, though they come from different theological traditions.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 13)
A man knowing nothing of God, and having no faith in the power of anything divine, which may become revealed in him, cannot be in possession of divine self-knowledge; but if man, by being obedient to the law, enters into a state of harmony…”
Both passages emphasize the idea that divine knowledge is not acquired through external means like books or reasoning but is an innate, direct experience of the divine. They both highlight the unity and harmony between the human soul and the divine.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 1)
p. 89 CHAPTER IV. CREATION. Everything we see in nature is manifested truth; only we are not able to recognise it as such, unless the truth is manifest within ourselves. God is the supreme, fundamental, universal, self-existent eternal…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine knowledge and the relationship between the divine and human realms. They emphasize the innate understanding of the divine and the distinction between human and divine natures, though they come from different mystical traditions.
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 12 (part 2)
At the same time, however, we perfectly fall short of the gods, and neither possess the same power with them, nor equal virtue, This Symbol, therefore, in a particular manner introduces the knowledge of the gods, as beings who are able to e…”
Both passages emphasize the importance of understanding and connecting with the divine. They share a focus on the superiority of divine knowledge and the need for disciplined, scientific, or intuitive approaches to grasp this knowledge. However, they come from different mystical traditions, Pythagorean and Neoplatonic, respectively.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1n
For this is clear, that when we perceived something, either by the help of sight or hearing, or some other sense, there was no difficulty in receiving from this a conception of some other thing like or unlike which had been forgotten and wh…”
Both passages discuss the pre-existence of the soul and its innate knowledge of divine or absolute concepts. Plato's Phaedo explores the idea of recollection and the soul's prior existence through dialogue, while the second passage emphasizes the innate knowledge of the divine as an essential part of the soul's nature.
western_esoteric|The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Manly P. Hall)|IntroductioniCONTRASTS
The attitude of Skepticism towards the knowable is summed up by Sextus Empiricus in the following words: "But the chief ground of Skepticism is that to every reason there is an opposite reason equivalent, which makes us forbear to dogmatize…”
Both passages discuss the nature of knowledge and belief in divine entities, but they present opposing views. The first passage describes Skepticism and Stoicism, which emphasize doubt and materialism, while the second passage argues for an innate, unquestionable knowledge of the divine, contrasting with the skeptical approach.