Gnostic John the Baptizer — Portents at John's Birth · 17 of 32 · tr. G.R.S. Mead
Section 17
"[The women] who wept ran hither and thither and [the men] who wailed
ran hither and thither, as long as the body lay there before them. When the
soul leaves the body, four 2 go forth to the
graveyard. [The women] who wept ran hither and thither. the men who wailed
ran hither and thither; and they ran hither and thither crying, until they
lowered it into the pit. When they had lowered the vain body and covered it
over [ sc . with earth], then the women ceased fram their death-wail.
They filled up the pit, and the men went away... ... . In haste left they the
body and grave and went away; they took hold of cup and ate bread and forgot
the vain body.—Now, an thou wilt, Ṣauriēl, let me stay here still two days.
Then will I sell the whole of my goods and share out among my sons, and will
take my vesture with me, the robe that ascends to Light's region.'
"Natheless Ṣauriēl returned answer unto her: 'Is there a child that has
left the womb of its mother, and that they shall have brought back again into
its mother, that I should leave thee in the Wicked Ones' 3 Dwelling, so that thou mayest see after a sharing among thy sons? I will lead
thee hence and put the robe of darkness upon [thee], for that thou hast not
let thyself be warned in this world, and hast not loved thy way to Light's
region. Therefore shalt thou be put in ward in the House of the Wicked, till
Heaven and Earth pass away.'"
And praisčd be Life.
1 Because Yōhānā
is mentioned only once in the Genzā , Brandt supposes that the John-Book
pieces must be later in date. But surely this is not a scientific conjecture.
It is rather to be supposed that the John-pieces were naturally gathered
together from the general mass of material when the collection-process began.
Though Yahyā is the Arabic form of the name, Yōhānā alternates with it; this
shows a later redaction in the Mohammedan period, when the people vulgarly
spoke Arabic, but says nothing as to the date of earlier writings from which
the pieces were copied out.
2 Ur-ashlam ,
a mock-name or derisive caricature-permutation = 'Ur perfected' it. Ur is
originally the Chaldćan Deus Lunus; he is the eldest son of Rūhā, the
World-Mother, and corresponds in some respects with the Yaldabaōth of 'Ophite'
gnosticism.
3 Who it was is
not disclosed. The dreamer's report is at first utterly discredited.
4 The Elizabeth of
Luke. The name may be some mystical echo of Elisheba, the wife of Aaron, the
first priest, just as the Miriam of the Jesus birth-story reminds us of Miriam
the prophetess, the sister of Moses, the first prophet. If the pre-Christian
Palestinian Dorshē Reshumōth may be thought incapable of going so far, the
Alexandrian Jewish allegorists, to whose school Philo belonged, would, and
did, sublimate the sister or wife of a sage into a figure of his spiritual
virtue or power. This will become clearer later on.
5 The Zacharias of
Luke.
Themes
◆Body As Obstacleanthropology
The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.
The text explicitly describes the 'vain body' as something to be lowered into a pit and forgotten.