← Home
Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter) · 19 of 19 · tr. E.B. Cowell, F. Max Müller, and J. Kakakusu

Section 1s

Because, O Bhagavat, if there were a sphere of worlds, there would exist a belief in matter; and what was preached as a belief in matter by the Tathâgata, that was preached as no-belief by the Tathâgata; and therefore it is called a belief in matter.' Bhagavat said: 'And a belief in matter itself, O Subhûti, is unmentionable and inexpressible; it is neither a thing nor no-thing, and this is known by children and ignorant persons.' (30) XXXI. 'And why? Because, O Subhûti, if a man were to say that belief in self, belief in a being, belief in life, belief in personality had been preached by the Tathâgata, would he be speaking truly?' Subhûti said: 'Not indeed, Bhagavat, not indeed, Sugata; he would not be speaking truly. And why? Because, O Bhagavat, what was preached by the Tathâgata as a belief in self, that was preached by the Tathâgata as no-belief; therefore it is called belief in self.' Bhagavat said: 'Thus then, O Subhûti, are all things to be perceived, to be looked upon, and to be believed by one who has entered on the path of the Bodhisattvas. And in this wise are they to be perceived, to be looked upon, and to be believed, that a man should believe neither in the idea of a thing nor in the idea of a no-thing. And why? Because, by saying: The idea of a thing, the idea of a thing indeed, it has been preached by the Tathâgata as no-idea of a thing.' (31) XXXII. 'And, O Subhûti, if a noble-minded Bodhisattva were to fill immeasurable and innumerable spheres of worlds with the seven treasures, and give them as a gift to holy and fully enlightened Tathâgatas; and if a son or a daughter of a good family, after taking from this treatise of the Law, this Pra gñ âpâramitâ, one Gâthâ of four lines only, should learn it, repeat it, understand it, and fully explain it to others, then the latter would on the strength of this produce a larger stock of merit, immeasurable and innumerable. And how should he explain it? As in the sky: Stars, darkness, a lamp, a phantom, dew, a bubble. A dream, a flash of lightning, and a cloud--thus we should look upon the world (all that was made). Thus he should explain; therefore it is said: He should explain.' Thus spoke the Bhagavat enraptured. The elder Subhûti, and the friars, nuns, the faithful laymen and women, and the Bodhisattvas also, and the whole world of gods, men, evil spirits and fairies, praised the preaching of the Bhagavat. (32) Thus is finished the Diamond-cutter, the blessed Pra gñ âpâramitâ.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

Ultimate reality is described as 'unmentionable and inexpressible' and defined by what it is not ('neither a thing nor no-thing').

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The dialogue aims at realizing the emptiness of phenomena as a form of direct wisdom (Prajna) leading to liberation.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

Binary distinctions such as mass versus no-mass and existence versus non-existence are dissolved to demonstrate the emptiness of concepts.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The text repeatedly uses contradictory statements, such as calling a mass of atoms a 'no-mass,' to destabilize conceptual attachment.

All passages →
Sunyata Emptinesssoteriology

The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.

[auto] The passage explicitly defines phenomena like atoms and worlds as 'no-mass' and 'no-sphere,' illustrating the lack of independent self-nature.

All passages →
Related passages · 8 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1a
CHAPTER IV Concerning ” Good ,” ” Light ,” ” Beautiful ,” “ Desire ,” ” Ecstasy ,” “ Jealousy .” Also that Evil is neither existent nor Sprung from anything existent nor inherent in existent things . 1. Now let us consider the name of “Go…”
Both passages explore the nature of reality and the limitations of conceptual understanding. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena and the futility of clinging to concepts, while Dionysius discusses the transcendent nature of the divine good and the limitations of human language and understanding in describing it.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 2)
"Natural man knows nothing about the mystery of the kingdom of God, because he is outside and not within the state of divinity, as is daily proved by the action of the philosophisers who are disputing about the attributes and the will of Go…”
Both passages emphasize the limitations of conventional understanding and the need to transcend dualistic thinking. The Diamond Sutra discusses the emptiness of all phenomena and the futility of clinging to concepts, while the second passage highlights the inadequacy of external reasoning and the necessity of inner divine knowledge.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 3)
7.) "I do not wish to divert men from the Word as it is written and taught; but my writings are intended to lead them from a merely historical belief to a living faith, even to Jesus Christ (the Light and Truth) Himself. All preaching and…”
Both passages emphasize the transcendence of conventional concepts and the importance of direct spiritual insight. The Diamond Sutra negates the belief in self and matter, advocating for a perception beyond duality, while the Christian mystic text emphasizes the inner divine spark and the necessity of spiritual awakening to comprehend the divine.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter II (part 5)
But if I should prove that a house, i.e., a physical fact, may exist, it does not at all mean that it exists really. If I prove that a man may own the house it is no proof that he owns it. Our relation to an idea and to a house are quite…”
Both passages explore the nature of existence and the distinction between physical and metaphysical realities. They discuss the idea that certain concepts or beliefs exist independently of their physical manifestations, and they challenge conventional views on the nature of these existences.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter II (part 6)
." 1 But the formula defining "space" as "the form of matter in the universe" suffers from this deficiency, that there is introduced in it the concept of "matter," i.e., the unknown . I have already spoken of that "dead-end siding," x=y, y…”
Both passages explore the abstract and conceptual nature of matter and other fundamental concepts, questioning their tangible existence and emphasizing their abstract, almost illusory nature. They both delve into the idea that these concepts are constructs of the mind rather than tangible entities.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter II (part 7)
A man easily admits his incompetency in music, dancing, or higher mathematics, but he always maintains the privilege of having an opinion and being a judge of questions relating to "first principles." It is difficult to discuss with such me…”
Both passages explore the nature of reality and the limitations of human perception and conceptualization. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena and the futility of clinging to concepts, while the second passage discusses the difficulty of defining space and the nature of matter, highlighting the challenges in perceiving and understanding fundamental principles.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XI (part 6)
I admit that the matter of our world, collected in one place, will not take more than one-tenth of the volume of the planetary sphere: Ii think that this figure is considerably exaggerated. After calculations of volume it will appear that…”
Both passages explore the nature of reality and the illusion of material substance. They discuss the vastness of the universe and the insignificance of material existence, albeit from different philosophical and religious perspectives.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 14)
How many arguments, how many religious struggles, how much of violence toward the thoughts of others would be rendered unnecessary and impossible if men would only understand that nobody possesses truth, but all are seeking for it, each in…”
Both passages explore the concept of the ineffable nature of ultimate reality and the limitations of language and concepts in describing it. They share a mystical perspective that emphasizes the transcendence of conventional categories and the importance of non-dualistic understanding.