← Home
Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter) · 9 of 19 · tr. E.B. Cowell, F. Max Müller, and J. Kakakusu

Section 1i

Therefore it is called the Pra gñ â-pâramitâ. 'Then, what do you think, O Subhûti, is there anything (dharma) that was preached by the Tathâgata?' Subhûti said: 'Not indeed, O Bhagvat, there is not anything that was preached by the Tathâgata.' Bhagavat said. 'What do you think then, O Subhûti,--the dust of the earth which is found in this sphere of a million millions of worlds, is that much?' Subhûti said: 'Yes, O Bhagavat, yes, O Sugata, that dust of the earth would be much. And why? Because, O Bhagavat, what was preached by the Tathâgata as the dust of the earth, that was preached by the Tathâgata as no-dust. Therefore it is called the dust of the earth. And what was preached by the Tathâgata as the sphere of worlds, that was preached by the Tathâgata as no-sphere. Therefore it is called the sphere of worlds.' Bhagavat said: 'What do you think, O Subhûti, is a holy and fully enlightened Tathâgata to be seen (known) by the thirty-two signs of a hero?' Subhûti said: 'No indeed, O Bhagavat; a holy and fully enlightened Tathâgata is not to be seen (known) by the thirty-two signs of a hero. And why? Because what was preached by the Tathâgata as the thirty-two signs of a hero, that was preached by the Tathâgata as no-signs. Therefore they are called the thirty-two signs of a hero.' Bhagavat said: 'If, O Subhûti, a woman or man should day by day sacrifice his life (selfhood[1]) as [1. Âtmabhâva seems to refer here to the living body, not to the spiritual Âtman, which, according to Buddha, can be got rid of by knowledge only. Buddha himself sacrificed his life again and again, and a willingness to die would probably be accepted for the deed.] many times as there are grains of sand in the river Gangâ, and if he should thus sacrifice his life for as many kalpas as there are grains of sand in the river Gangâ, and if another man, after taking from this treatise of the Law one Gâthâ of four lines only, should fully teach others and explain it, he indeed would on the strength of this produce a larger stock of merit, immeasurable and innumerable.' (13) XIV. At that time, the venerable Subhûti was moved by the power of the Law, shed tears, and having wiped his tears, he thus spoke to Bhagavat: 'It is wonderful, O Bhagavat, it is exceedingly wonderful, O Sugata, how fully this teaching of the Law has been preached by the Tathâgata for the benefit of those beings who entered on the foremost path (the path that leads to Nirvâ n a), and who entered on the best path, from whence, O Bhagavat, knowledge has been produced in me. Never indeed, O Bhagavat, has such a teaching of the Law been heard by me before. Those Bodhisattvas, O Bhagavat, will be endowed with the highest wonder[1], who when this Sûtra is being preached hear it and will frame to themselves a true idea. And why? Because what is a true idea is not a true idea.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The Buddha negates the existence of any preached Dharma, describing the ultimate truth through denial rather than affirmation.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

The text emphasizes sacrificing selfhood and not clinging to signs or names, aligning with the definition's mention of Buddhist non-grasping.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The treatise is named 'Transcendent wisdom' (Prajna-paramita), indicating salvation through direct realization of truth rather than ritual alone.

All passages →
Infinite Cosmoscosmology

The doctrine of the universe as boundless and without center or circumference, populated by innumerable worlds — Bruno's rejection of the closed Aristotelian sphere; the divine and the cosmos as ontologically infinite.

The passage references a 'sphere of a million millions of worlds' and grains of sand in the Ganga to illustrate boundless scale.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

The text dissolves the binary distinction between wisdom and non-wisdom by equating Prajnaparamita with no-Pramitâ.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The text relies on the rhetorical device of stating that what is preached as X is actually preached as no-X to destabilize ordinary understanding.

All passages →
Sunyata Emptinesssoteriology

The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.

[auto] The passage centrally defines phenomena like Dharma, dust, and signs as 'no-Dharma,' 'no-dust,' and 'no-signs,' illustrating the lack of inherent self-nature.

All passages →
Related passages · 9 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1a
CHAPTER IV Concerning ” Good ,” ” Light ,” ” Beautiful ,” “ Desire ,” ” Ecstasy ,” “ Jealousy .” Also that Evil is neither existent nor Sprung from anything existent nor inherent in existent things . 1. Now let us consider the name of “Go…”
Both passages explore the paradoxical nature of ultimate reality and the limitations of human perception and language in describing it. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena, including the Buddha's teachings, while the passage from Dionysius discusses the transcendent nature of the divine Good, which is beyond human comprehension and yet the source of all existence.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1a
The Key <This longer tractate presents itself explicitly as a summary or abridgement of the General Sermons (CH II-IX), and discusses the Hermetic view of knowledge and its role in the lives and afterlives of human beings. The attentive re…”
Both passages emphasize the transcendence of ultimate reality beyond conventional concepts and language. The Diamond Sutra highlights the emptiness of all phenomena, including the Buddha's teachings, while The Key discusses the distinction between ordinary knowledge and transcendent gnosis, valuing both in the Hermetic tradition.
jewish_mysticism|The Greater Holy Assembly (Idra Rabba Qadisha)|Idra Rabba, Chapter 1 (part 2)
1 12. "For it is written, Deut. xxxiii. 29: 'Blessed art thou, O Israel: who is like unto thee?' Also it is written, Exod. xv. 11: 'Who is like unto thee among the gods, O Tetragrammaton?'" 2 13. He called Rabbi Eleazer, his son, and…”
Both passages explore the nature of ultimate reality and the limitations of language and conceptual thought in describing it. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena, including the Buddha's teachings, while the Idra Rabba discusses the secret and ineffable nature of divine wisdom, highlighting the need for spiritual firmness and secrecy in its contemplation.
taoism|Tao Te Ching|Chapter 25
There was something undefined and complete, coming into existence before Heaven and Earth. How still it was and formless, standing alone, and undergoing no change, reaching everywhere and in no danger (of being exhausted)! It may be regarde…”
Both passages explore the concept of an ultimate, formless reality that is the source of all things. The Tao Te Ching describes the Tao as undefined and complete, while the Buddhist text discusses the nature of the Tathāgata and the emptiness of all phenomena, highlighting the interconnectedness and ultimate reality beyond form.
taoism|Tao Te Ching|Chapter 32
The Tao, considered as unchanging, has no name. Though in its primordial simplicity it may be small, the whole world dares not deal with (one embodying) it as a minister. If a feudal prince or the king could guard and hold it, all would spo…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of ultimate reality (Tao in Passage A and the teachings of the Tathâgata in Passage B) and the paradoxical nature of naming or describing it. They emphasize the limitations of language and concepts in capturing the true essence of these mystical truths.
taoism|Tao Te Ching|Chapter 56
He who knows (the Tao) does not (care to) speak (about it); he who is (ever ready to) speak about it does not know it. He (who knows it) will keep his mouth shut and close the portals (of his nostrils). He will blunt his sharp points and un…”
Both passages emphasize the ineffable nature of ultimate reality (Tao in Passage A, Dharma in Passage B) and the paradoxical nature of speaking about it. They share a theme of transcending conventional understanding and the limitations of language.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 124 (part 10)
Of the sounds of Man very little is said, but they form the subject of the next paragraph. Nothing is said in answer to the disciple's inquiry about the notes of Heaven. It is intimated, however, that there is no necessity to introduce an…”
Both passages discuss the nature of ultimate reality and the role of language and perception in understanding it. The Writings of Chuang Tzu emphasize the Tao as the natural course of phenomena, while the Buddhist text discusses the Pra gñ â-pâramitâ (Transcendent wisdom) and the nature of the Tathâgata's teachings, both highlighting the idea that ultimate reality transcends conventional language and perception.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 128 (part 4)
245 got It, and by It dwelt in the Dark Palace. Yü-khiang 1 got It, and by It was set on the North Pole. Hsî Wang-mû 2 got It, and by It had her seat in (the palace of) Shâo-kwang. No one knows Its beginning; no one knows Its end. Phäng…”
Both passages discuss the concept of transcendent wisdom or the Tao, emphasizing the idea that true understanding transcends conventional knowledge and perception. They both highlight the difficulty of conveying this understanding and the profound transformation it brings to the individual.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 129 (part 4)
It conducts nothing and anticipates nothing; it responds to (what is before it), but does not retain it. Thus he is able to deal successfully with all things, and injures none. 7. The Ruler 3 of the Southern Ocean was Shû 4 , the p. 267…”
Both passages explore the concept of non-attachment and the paradoxical nature of reality. In Passage A, the story of Chaos illustrates the danger of imposing structure on the formless, while Passage B discusses the emptiness of all phenomena, including the teachings of the Buddha, emphasizing the importance of understanding beyond literal interpretation.