Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter) · 9 of 19 · tr. E.B. Cowell, F. Max Müller, and J. Kakakusu
Section 1i
Therefore it is called the Pra gñ â-pâramitâ.
'Then, what do you think, O Subhûti, is there anything (dharma) that was preached by the Tathâgata?' Subhûti said: 'Not indeed, O Bhagvat, there is not anything that was preached by the Tathâgata.' Bhagavat said.
'What do you think then, O Subhûti,--the dust of the earth which is found in this sphere of a million millions of worlds, is that much?' Subhûti said: 'Yes, O Bhagavat, yes, O Sugata, that dust of the earth would be much.
And why?
Because, O Bhagavat, what was preached by the Tathâgata as the dust of the earth, that was preached by the Tathâgata as no-dust.
Therefore it is called the dust of the earth.
And what was preached by the Tathâgata as the sphere of worlds, that was preached by the Tathâgata as no-sphere.
Therefore it is called the sphere of worlds.' Bhagavat said: 'What do you think, O Subhûti, is a holy and fully enlightened Tathâgata to be seen (known) by the thirty-two signs of a hero?' Subhûti said: 'No indeed, O Bhagavat; a holy and fully enlightened Tathâgata is not to be seen (known) by the thirty-two signs of a hero.
And why?
Because what was preached by the Tathâgata as the thirty-two signs of a hero, that was preached by the Tathâgata as no-signs.
Therefore they are called the thirty-two signs of a hero.' Bhagavat said: 'If, O Subhûti, a woman or man should day by day sacrifice his life (selfhood[1]) as [1.
Âtmabhâva seems to refer here to the living body, not to the spiritual Âtman, which, according to Buddha, can be got rid of by knowledge only.
Buddha himself sacrificed his life again and again, and a willingness to die would probably be accepted for the deed.] many times as there are grains of sand in the river Gangâ, and if he should thus sacrifice his life for as many kalpas as there are grains of sand in the river Gangâ, and if another man, after taking from this treatise of the Law one Gâthâ of four lines only, should fully teach others and explain it, he indeed would on the strength of this produce a larger stock of merit, immeasurable and innumerable.' (13) XIV.
At that time, the venerable Subhûti was moved by the power of the Law, shed tears, and having wiped his tears, he thus spoke to Bhagavat: 'It is wonderful, O Bhagavat, it is exceedingly wonderful, O Sugata, how fully this teaching of the Law has been preached by the Tathâgata for the benefit of those beings who entered on the foremost path (the path that leads to Nirvâ n a), and who entered on the best path, from whence, O Bhagavat, knowledge has been produced in me.
Never indeed, O Bhagavat, has such a teaching of the Law been heard by me before.
Those Bodhisattvas, O Bhagavat, will be endowed with the highest wonder[1], who when this Sûtra is being preached hear it and will frame to themselves a true idea.
And why?
Because what is a true idea is not a true idea.
Themes
◆Apophatic Theologytheology
Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.
The Buddha negates the existence of any preached Dharma, describing the ultimate truth through denial rather than affirmation.
Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.
The text emphasizes sacrificing selfhood and not clinging to signs or names, aligning with the definition's mention of Buddhist non-grasping.
The doctrine of the universe as boundless and without center or circumference, populated by innumerable worlds — Bruno's rejection of the closed Aristotelian sphere; the divine and the cosmos as ontologically infinite.
The passage references a 'sphere of a million millions of worlds' and grains of sand in the Ganga to illustrate boundless scale.
Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.
[auto] The text relies on the rhetorical device of stating that what is preached as X is actually preached as no-X to destabilize ordinary understanding.
The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.
[auto] The passage centrally defines phenomena like Dharma, dust, and signs as 'no-Dharma,' 'no-dust,' and 'no-signs,' illustrating the lack of inherent self-nature.