← Home
Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter) · 8 of 19 · tr. E.B. Cowell, F. Max Müller, and J. Kakakusu

Section 1h

Do you think then, O Subhûti, that his selfhood (he himself) would be large?' Subhûti said: 'Yes, O Bhagavat, yes, O Sugata, his selfhood would be large. And why? Because, O Bhagavat, when the Tathâgata preached: "Selfhood, selfhood indeed!" it was preached by him as no-selfhood. Therefore it is called selfhood.' (10) XI. Bhagavat said: 'What do you think, O Subhûti, if there were as many Gangâ rivers as there are grains of sand in the large river Gangâ, would the grains of sand be many?' Subhûti said: 'Those Gangâ rivers would indeed be many, much more the grains of sand in those Gangâ rivers.' Bhagavat said: 'I tell you, O Subhûti, I announce to you, If a woman or man were to fill with the seven treasures as many worlds as there would be grains of sand in those Gangâ rivers and present them as a gift to the holy and fully enlightened Tathâgatas--What do you think, O Subhûti, would that woman or man on the strength of this produce a large stock of merit?' Subhûti said: 'Yes, O Bhagavat, yes, O Sugata, that woman or man would on the strength of this produce a large stock of merit, immeasurable and innumerable.' Bhagavat said: 'And if, O Subhûti, a woman or man having filled so many worlds with the seven treasures should give them as a gift to the holy and enlightened Tathâgatas, and if another son or daughter of a good family, after taking from this treatise of the Law one Gâthâ of four lines only, should fully teach others and explain it, he, indeed, would on the strength of this produce a larger stock of merit, immeasurable and innumerable.' (11) XII. 'Then again, O Subhûti, that part of the world in which, after taking from this treatise of the Law one Gâthâ of four lines only, it should be preached or explained, would be like a K aitya (holy shrine) for the whole world of gods, men, and spirits; what should we say then of those who learn the whole of this treatise of the Law to the end, who repeat it, understand it, and fully explain it to others? They, O Subhûti, will be endowed with the highest wonder[1]. And in that place, O Subhûti, there dwells the teacher[2], or one after another holding the place of the wise preceptor[3].' (12) XIII. After these words, the venerable Subhûti spoke thus to Bhagavat: 'O Bhagavat, how is this treatise of the Law called, and how can I learn it?' After this, Bhagavat spoke thus to the venerable Subhûti: 'This treatise of the Law, O Subhûti, is called the Pra gñ â-pâramitâ (Transcendent wisdom), and you should learn it by that name. And why? Because, O Subhûti, what was preached by the Tathâgata as the Pra gñ â-pâramitâ, that was preached by the [1. With what excites the highest wonder. 2. S astâ, often the name of Budha, Pâli sattha. 3. This may refer to a succession of teachers handing down the tradition one to the other.] Tathâgata as no-Pâramitâ.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

Reality and the Tathagata's teaching are described primarily through negation ('no-numbers', 'no-selfhood'), aligning with the via negativa.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

The instruction to frame a mind 'not believing in anything' reflects radical non-grasping and letting go of conceptual attachment.

All passages →
Infinite Cosmoscosmology

The doctrine of the universe as boundless and without center or circumference, populated by innumerable worlds — Bruno's rejection of the closed Aristotelian sphere; the divine and the cosmos as ontologically infinite.

The text utilizes imagery of innumerable worlds and grains of sand to illustrate a vast, boundless cosmological scale.

All passages →
Meditationpraxis

Disciplined inward attention — sitting, focused, or open-awareness practice — as a stand-alone term that umbrellas active_contemplation, inner_silence, and dhyana-style sitting.

The directive to 'frame an independent mind' implies a disciplined inward attention or contemplative practice.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

The passage dissolves binary distinctions between existence and non-existence by equating 'numbers' with 'no-numbers' and 'selfhood' with 'no-selfhood'.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text employs apparent contradictions like 'numbers of worlds... as no-numbers' to destabilize ordinary understanding and induce insight.

All passages →
Renunciation Of Wealthethics

The spiritual danger of attachment to material possessions; wealth as a spiritual obstacle.

While material giving yields merit, the text prioritizes teaching the Dharma over filling worlds with treasures, suggesting spiritual superiority over material wealth.

All passages →
Sunyata Emptinesssoteriology

The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.

[auto] The passage explicitly defines phenomena like worlds and selfhood as 'no-numbers' and 'no-selfhood,' embodying the core doctrine that all things lack independent self-nature.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 3)
7.) "I do not wish to divert men from the Word as it is written and taught; but my writings are intended to lead them from a merely historical belief to a living faith, even to Jesus Christ (the Light and Truth) Himself. All preaching and…”
Both passages emphasize the transcendence of the ultimate reality (selfhood in Buddhism, divine Spirit in Christian mysticism) and the idea that true understanding comes from within rather than external sources. They also highlight the importance of teaching and awakening this inner knowledge.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 7 (part 3)
2.) "The inner man stood in heaven; his essences were the Paradise; his body was indestructible. He knew the language of God and the angels, and the language of nature, as may be seen by Adam giving names to all creatures, to each accordin…”
Both passages explore the themes of non-duality and the transcendence of the physical form. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena, including selfhood, while the Christian mysticism passage describes Adam's state of unity with all creation and his indestructible, divine nature. Both texts convey the idea of a reality beyond the physical and the illusory nature of the self.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Front Matter, p. 4 (part 8)
43 these unnatural habits." As, therefore, it is not wonderful that the greatest part of those who inhabit a pestiferous region, should languish and decline, but that a very few should preserve their natural strength; so we ought not to won…”
Both passages discuss the concept of multiple divine beings or gods subordinate to a supreme deity. The Vajrakkhedika passage emphasizes the idea of non-attachment and the illusion of selfhood, while the Hymn passage explores the hierarchical structure of divine beings and their relationship to the supreme God. Both texts share a mystical perspective on the nature of divinity and the universe.
jewish_mysticism|The Book of Concealed Mystery (Siphra Dtzenioutha)|1e
31: "And He was wise above every man." Because these are not classed with man. 21. (But when it is said) "And the Tetragrammaton gave him wisdom," then is understood the supernal He . (Because he gave unto him the influx of the wisdom of…”
Both passages explore the concept of transcending conventional understanding and the limitations of language and form to convey deeper spiritual truths. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena, including selfhood and the world, while the Kabbalistic text discusses the transcendent nature of divine wisdom and the limitations of human understanding.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 165 (part 2)
The more perfect the man, the more compliant he is, even towards his fellows; we must temper our importance, not thrusting insolently beyond what our nature warrants; we must allow other beings, also, their place in the presence of the Godh…”
Both passages discuss the nature of self and the importance of transcending ego. The Vajrakkhedika emphasizes the concept of 'no-self' and the merit of teaching and understanding the Dharma, while Plotinus discusses the importance of humility and not exalting oneself above others in the presence of the Godhead. Both texts stress the importance of understanding one's place in the broader context of the universe or the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 638
Section 18 18. It appears then that Number in that realm is definite; it is we that can conceive the "More than is present"; the infinity lies in our counting: in the Real is no conceiving more than has been conceived; all stands entire; no…”
Both passages explore the nature of multiplicity and the concept of number, emphasizing that the perception of numbers and quantities is a construct of the mind rather than an inherent property of existence. They share a mystical perspective on the illusory nature of multiplicity and the underlying unity of being.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1
The reason why I say this is that I want you to agree with me in thinking, not only that absolute greatness will never be great and also small, but that greatness in us or in the concrete will never admit the small or admit of being exceede…”
Both passages explore the nature of selfhood and the interplay between opposites, such as greatness and smallness, and the transcendence of these concepts in their respective mystical traditions. The Diamond Sutra discusses the concept of 'no-selfhood' and the transcendence of merit, while the Platonic dialogue explores the nature of opposites and their inability to become their own opposites.