Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter) · 8 of 19 · tr. E.B. Cowell, F. Max Müller, and J. Kakakusu
Section 1h
Do you think then, O Subhûti, that his selfhood (he himself) would be large?' Subhûti said: 'Yes, O Bhagavat, yes, O Sugata, his selfhood would be large.
And why?
Because, O Bhagavat, when the Tathâgata preached: "Selfhood, selfhood indeed!" it was preached by him as no-selfhood.
Therefore it is called selfhood.' (10) XI.
Bhagavat said: 'What do you think, O Subhûti, if there were as many Gangâ rivers as there are grains of sand in the large river Gangâ, would the grains of sand be many?' Subhûti said: 'Those Gangâ rivers would indeed be many, much more the grains of sand in those Gangâ rivers.' Bhagavat said: 'I tell you, O Subhûti, I announce to you, If a woman or man were to fill with the seven treasures as many worlds as there would be grains of sand in those Gangâ rivers and present them as a gift to the holy and fully enlightened Tathâgatas--What do you think, O Subhûti, would that woman or man on the strength of this produce a large stock of merit?' Subhûti said: 'Yes, O Bhagavat, yes, O Sugata, that woman or man would on the strength of this produce a large stock of merit, immeasurable and innumerable.' Bhagavat said: 'And if, O Subhûti, a woman or man having filled so many worlds with the seven treasures should give them as a gift to the holy and enlightened Tathâgatas, and if another son or daughter of a good family, after taking from this treatise of the Law one Gâthâ of four lines only, should fully teach others and explain it, he, indeed, would on the strength of this produce a larger stock of merit, immeasurable and innumerable.' (11) XII.
'Then again, O Subhûti, that part of the world in which, after taking from this treatise of the Law one Gâthâ of four lines only, it should be preached or explained, would be like a K aitya (holy shrine) for the whole world of gods, men, and spirits; what should we say then of those who learn the whole of this treatise of the Law to the end, who repeat it, understand it, and fully explain it to others?
They, O Subhûti, will be endowed with the highest wonder[1].
And in that place, O Subhûti, there dwells the teacher[2], or one after another holding the place of the wise preceptor[3].' (12) XIII.
After these words, the venerable Subhûti spoke thus to Bhagavat: 'O Bhagavat, how is this treatise of the Law called, and how can I learn it?' After this, Bhagavat spoke thus to the venerable Subhûti: 'This treatise of the Law, O Subhûti, is called the Pra gñ â-pâramitâ (Transcendent wisdom), and you should learn it by that name.
And why?
Because, O Subhûti, what was preached by the Tathâgata as the Pra gñ â-pâramitâ, that was preached by the [1.
With what excites the highest wonder.
2.
S astâ, often the name of Budha, Pâli sattha.
3.
This may refer to a succession of teachers handing down the tradition one to the other.] Tathâgata as no-Pâramitâ.
Themes
◆Apophatic Theologytheology
Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.
Reality and the Tathagata's teaching are described primarily through negation ('no-numbers', 'no-selfhood'), aligning with the via negativa.
Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.
The instruction to frame a mind 'not believing in anything' reflects radical non-grasping and letting go of conceptual attachment.
The doctrine of the universe as boundless and without center or circumference, populated by innumerable worlds — Bruno's rejection of the closed Aristotelian sphere; the divine and the cosmos as ontologically infinite.
The text utilizes imagery of innumerable worlds and grains of sand to illustrate a vast, boundless cosmological scale.
Disciplined inward attention — sitting, focused, or open-awareness practice — as a stand-alone term that umbrellas active_contemplation, inner_silence, and dhyana-style sitting.
The directive to 'frame an independent mind' implies a disciplined inward attention or contemplative practice.
The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.
The passage dissolves binary distinctions between existence and non-existence by equating 'numbers' with 'no-numbers' and 'selfhood' with 'no-selfhood'.
The spiritual danger of attachment to material possessions; wealth as a spiritual obstacle.
While material giving yields merit, the text prioritizes teaching the Dharma over filling worlds with treasures, suggesting spiritual superiority over material wealth.
The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.
[auto] The passage explicitly defines phenomena like worlds and selfhood as 'no-numbers' and 'no-selfhood,' embodying the core doctrine that all things lack independent self-nature.