'Both' in the first edition of my translation was a misprint for 'birth.' 394.
I have not copied the language of the Bible more than I was justified in.
The words are abbhantaran te gahana m , bâhira m parima gg asi, 'interna est abyssus, externum mundas.' Cf.
G âtaka, vol.
i.
p.
481.
395.
The expression Kisan dhamanisanthatam is the Sanskrit k ri sa m dhamanîsantatam, the frequent occurrence of which in the Mahâbhârata has been pointed out by Boehtlingk, s.v.
dhamani.
It looks more like a Brâhmanic than like a Buddhist phrase.] p.
91 emaciated and covered with veins, who lives alone in the forest, and meditates, him I call indeed a Brâhma n a.
396.
I do not call a man a Brâhma n a because of his origin or of his mother.
He is indeed arrogant, and he is wealthy: but the poor, who is free from all attachments, him I call indeed a Brâhma n a.
397.
Him I call indeed a Brâhma n a who has cut all fetters, who never trembles, is independent and unshackled.
398.
Him I call indeed a Brâhma n a who has cut the strap and the thong, the chain with all that pertains to it, who has burst the bar, and is awakened.
399.
Him I call indeed a Brâhma n a who, though he has committed no offence, endures reproach, bonds, and stripes, who has endurance for his force, and strength for his army.
400.
Him I call indeed a Brâhma n a who is free from anger, dutiful, virtuous, without appetite, who is subdued, and has received his last body.
[396.
From verse 396 to the first half of verse 423, the text of the Dhammapada agrees with the text of the Vasish th a-Bharadvâ g asûtra.
These verses are translated by D'Alwis in his Nirvâ n a, pp.
113-118, and again by Fausböll, Suttanipâta, v.
620 seq .
The text contains puns on ki ñk ana, which means 'wealth,' but also 'attachment;' cf.
Childers, s.v.
398.
D'Alwis points out a double entendre in these words.
Nandhi may be either the strap that goes round a drum, or enmity; varatta may be either a thong or attachment; sandâna either chain or scepticism; sabanakkamam either due order or all its concomitants; paligha either bar or ignorance.
399.
The exact meaning of balânîka is difficult to find.
Does it mean, possessed of a strong army, or facing a force, or leading a force?] p.
92 401.
Him I call indeed a Brâhma n a who does not cling to pleasures, like water on a lotus leaf, like a mustard seed on the point of a needle.
402.
Him I call indeed a Brâhma n a who, even here, knows the end of his suffering, has put down his burden, and is unshackled.
403.
Him I call indeed a Brâhma n a whose knowledge is deep, who possesses wisdom, who knows the right way and the wrong, and has attained the highest end.
404.
Him I call indeed a Brâhma n a who keeps aloof both from laymen and from mendicants, who frequents no houses, and has but few desires.
Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.
The passage repeatedly emphasizes cutting fetters, being unshackled, and having no attachments as marks of true Brahmana status.
Disciplined inward attention — sitting, focused, or open-awareness practice — as a stand-alone term that umbrellas active_contemplation, inner_silence, and dhyana-style sitting.
The passage explicitly mentions a person who 'lives alone in the forest, and meditates' as an example of a Brahmana.
Eckhart's radical reading of Matthew 5:3 — the saint as one who wants nothing, knows nothing, and has nothing, having emptied even the will and the self with which to receive God; distinct from renunciation_of_wealth (material poverty).
The passage states that the poor who is free from all attachments is called a true Brahmana, aligning with the concept of spiritual poverty.
The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.
The concept of being free from attachments and having no self-nature is central to the definition of the true Brahmana provided in the text.