← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 39 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter V (part 2)

Form pertains to all things . We say that everything consists of matter and form . Under the category of "matter," as already stated, the cause of a lengthy series of mixed sensations is predicated, but matter without form is not comprehensible to us; we cannot even think of matter without form. But we can think and imagine form without matter. The thing , i.e., the union of form and matter, is never constant ; p. 54 it always changes in the course of time. This idea afforded Newton the possibility of building his theory of fluents and fluxions . Newton came to the conclusion that constant quantities do not exist in nature. Variables do exist— flowing , fluents only. The velocities with which different fluents change were called by Newton fluxions . From the standpoint of this theory all things known to us—men, plants, animals, planets—are fluents, and they differ by the magnitude of their fluxions. But the thing , changing continuously in time, sometimes very much, and quickly, as in the case of a living body for example, still remains one and the same . The body of a man in youth, and the body of a man in senility—these are one and the same, though we know that in the old body there is not one atom left that was in the young one. The matter changes, but something remains one under all changes, this something is the Linga-Sharîra . Newton's theory is valid for the three-dimensional world existing in time. In this world there is nothing constant. All is variable because every consecutive moment the thing is already not that which it was before. We never see the Linga-Sharîra , we see always its parts, and they appear to us variable. But if we observe more attentively we shall see that it is an illusion. Things of three dimensions are unreal and variable. They cannot be real because they do not exist in reality, just as the imaginary sections of a solid do not exist. Four-dimensional bodies alone are real. In one of the lectures contained in the book, A Pluralistic Universe , Prof. James calls attention to Prof. Bergson's remark that science studies always only the t of the universe , i.e., not the universe in its entirety, but the moment , the "temporal section" of the universe. ______ The properties of four-dimensional space will become clearer to us if we compare in detail three-dimensional space with the surface, and discover the differences existing between them. Hinton, in his book, A New Era of Thought , examines these differences very attentively. He represents to himself, on a plane, two equal rectangular triangles, cut out of paper, the right angles of which are placed in opposite directions. These triangles will be p. 55 equal, but for some reason quite different. The right angle of one is directed to the right, that of the other to the left. If anyone wants to make them quite similar, it is possible to do so only with the help of three-dimensional space. That is, it is necessary to take one triangle, turn it over, and put it back on the plane. Then they will be two equal, and exactly similar triangles. But in order to effect this, it was necessary to take one triangle from the plane into three-dimensional space, and turn it over in that space. If the triangle is left on the plane, then it will never be possible to make it identical with the other, keeping the same relation of angles of the one to those of the other. If the triangle is merely rotated in the plane this similarity will never be established. In our world there are figures quite analogous to these two triangles. We know certain shapes which are equal the one to the other, which are exactly similar, and yet which we cannot make fit into the same portion of space, either practically or by imagination.
Themes
Numerical Mysticismtheology

Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality.

Geometric dimensions and mathematical concepts like fluents and fluxions are used as the structural basis for explaining reality.

All passages →
Active Contemplationpraxis

A form of meditation that uses imagery, imagination, or symbolic thought rather than purely empty stillness.

[auto] The author encourages using imagination and geometric visualization to perceive higher dimensions of reality beyond ordinary senses.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

[auto] The text establishes an ontological opposition between the variable, unreal three-dimensional world and the constant, real four-dimensional reality.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] Understanding the true nature of reality is presented as a matter of attentive observation that reveals illusion versus truth.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The passage uses the analogy of triangles in different dimensions to demonstrate how binary oppositions become identical in a higher reality.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The passage relies on the paradox that things change continuously yet remain one and the same to convey metaphysical truths.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

[auto] The text identifies the Linga-Sharîra as the constant element within a changing human body, pointing to knowledge of one's true nature.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] It argues that despite apparent changes in matter, a single constant reality (the Linga-Sharîra or four-dimensional body) underlies all existence.

All passages →
Related passages · 11 parallels
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VIIId
For it is necessary that every form in the universe should be never failing, in order that the universe may be perfect, and that, being generated from an immoveable cause, it may be immoveable in its essence. But every wholeness is a form,…”
Both passages discuss the nature of form and matter, and the constancy or variability of things in the universe. They explore the idea of underlying structures or forms that remain constant despite changes in matter, though they approach this from different philosophical and mystical perspectives.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 93
Section 3 3. We have to ask, that is, how Matter, this entity of ceaseless flux constituting the physical mass of the universe, could serve towards the immortality of the Kosmos. And our answer is "Because the flux is not outgoing": where t…”
Both passages discuss the nature of matter, form, and the persistence of identity despite constant change. They explore the idea of underlying principles that maintain the integrity of the cosmos or individual entities, albeit from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 94
Section 4 4. But matters are involved here which demand specific investigation and cannot be treated as incidental merely to our present problem. We are faced with several questions: Is the heavenly system exposed to any such flux as would…”
Both passages discuss the nature of form and matter, and the idea of underlying constancy amidst change. They explore the concept of a persistent principle that remains unchanged despite the flux of material elements, though they use different terminology and frameworks.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 125
Section 3 3. Now it may be observed, first of all, that we cannot hold utterly cheap either the indeterminate, or even a Kind whose very idea implies absence of form, provided only that it offer itself to its Priors and [through them] to th…”
Both passages discuss the nature of form and matter, their relationship, and the concept of change. They explore how form and matter interact in different realms (Intellectual vs. three-dimensional world) and the idea of permanence amidst change, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 126
Section 4 4. The present existence of the Ideal-Forms has been demonstrated elsewhere: we take up our argument from that point. If, then, there is more than one of such forming Ideas, there must of necessity be some character common to all…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between form and matter, exploring the idea of a substratum or underlying reality that supports the forms we perceive. They both delve into the nature of reality and the role of form in the structure of existence, though from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 127
Section 5 5. It may be objected that the Intellectual-Principle possesses its content in an eternal conjunction so that the two make a perfect unity, and that thus there is no Matter there. But that argument would equally cancel the Matter…”
Both passages discuss the nature of form and matter, and the idea that while matter is constantly changing, there is an underlying, unchanging aspect. They also explore the concept of dimensions and the reality of four-dimensional space versus three-dimensional space.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 128
Section 6 6. We are led thus to the question of receptivity in things of body. An additional proof that bodies must have some substratum different from themselves is found in the changing of the basic-constituents into one another. Notice t…”
Both passages explore the relationship between form and matter, and the nature of reality. They discuss the idea of an underlying, constant element that persists despite changes in the physical world, with Passage A referring to the Linga-Sharîra and Passage B discussing the Intelligible Realm and Matter.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 238 (part 1)
Section 6 6. the Intellectual Essence, wholly of the order of Ideal-form, must be taken as impassive has been already established. But Matter also is an incorporeal, though after a mode of its own; we must examine, therefore, how this sta…”
Both passages explore the nature of form and matter, and the idea that what is perceived as constant is actually variable. They also discuss the concept of higher dimensions and the limitations of human perception in understanding reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 239
Section 7 7. We are thus brought back to the nature of that underlying matter and the things believed to be based upon it; investigation will show us that Matter has no reality and is not capable of being affected. Matter must be bodiless-…”
Both passages explore the nature of form and matter, and the idea that what is perceived as constant is actually variable. They also discuss the concept of higher dimensions and the limitations of human perception in understanding reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 420
Section 4 4. But there is yet another way to this knowledge: Admiring the world of sense as we look out upon its vastness and beauty and the order of its eternal march, thinking of the gods within it, seen and hidden, and the celestial spir…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and multiplicity, discussing how a single essence or form can be present in multiple instances without being divided. Passage A uses the example of the Linga-Sharîra and four-dimensional space, while Passage B uses the example of a science and its constituents, but both convey the idea of an underlying unity that remains constant amidst apparent diversity.
1 more
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1w
in space ], grasping existence in some way or other, or it could not be at all. But true and exact reason, vindicating the nature of true being, maintains that while two things [i.e. the image and space] are different they cannot exist on…”
Both passages explore the nature of form and matter, and the idea that higher-dimensional realities underpin the apparent variability of three-dimensional objects. They also discuss the limitations of perceiving and manipulating objects within their respective dimensional constraints.