Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 39 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon
Chapter V (part 2)
Form pertains to all things .
We say that everything consists of matter and form .
Under the category of "matter," as already stated, the cause of a lengthy series of mixed sensations is predicated, but matter without form is not comprehensible to us; we cannot even think of matter without form.
But we can think and imagine form without matter.
The thing , i.e., the union of form and matter, is never constant ; p.
54 it always changes in the course of time.
This idea afforded Newton the possibility of building his theory of fluents and fluxions .
Newton came to the conclusion that constant quantities do not exist in nature.
Variables do exist— flowing , fluents only.
The velocities with which different fluents change were called by Newton fluxions .
From the standpoint of this theory all things known to us—men, plants, animals, planets—are fluents, and they differ by the magnitude of their fluxions.
But the thing , changing continuously in time, sometimes very much, and quickly, as in the case of a living body for example, still remains one and the same .
The body of a man in youth, and the body of a man in senility—these are one and the same, though we know that in the old body there is not one atom left that was in the young one.
The matter changes, but something remains one under all changes, this something is the Linga-Sharîra .
Newton's theory is valid for the three-dimensional world existing in time.
In this world there is nothing constant.
All is variable because every consecutive moment the thing is already not that which it was before.
We never see the Linga-Sharîra , we see always its parts, and they appear to us variable.
But if we observe more attentively we shall see that it is an illusion.
Things of three dimensions are unreal and variable.
They cannot be real because they do not exist in reality, just as the imaginary sections of a solid do not exist.
Four-dimensional bodies alone are real.
In one of the lectures contained in the book, A Pluralistic Universe , Prof.
James calls attention to Prof.
Bergson's remark that science studies always only the t of the universe , i.e., not the universe in its entirety, but the moment , the "temporal section" of the universe.
______ The properties of four-dimensional space will become clearer to us if we compare in detail three-dimensional space with the surface, and discover the differences existing between them.
Hinton, in his book, A New Era of Thought , examines these differences very attentively.
He represents to himself, on a plane, two equal rectangular triangles, cut out of paper, the right angles of which are placed in opposite directions.
These triangles will be p.
55 equal, but for some reason quite different.
The right angle of one is directed to the right, that of the other to the left.
If anyone wants to make them quite similar, it is possible to do so only with the help of three-dimensional space.
That is, it is necessary to take one triangle, turn it over, and put it back on the plane.
Then they will be two equal, and exactly similar triangles.
But in order to effect this, it was necessary to take one triangle from the plane into three-dimensional space, and turn it over in that space.
If the triangle is left on the plane, then it will never be possible to make it identical with the other, keeping the same relation of angles of the one to those of the other.
If the triangle is merely rotated in the plane this similarity will never be established.
In our world there are figures quite analogous to these two triangles.
We know certain shapes which are equal the one to the other, which are exactly similar, and yet which we cannot make fit into the same portion of space, either practically or by imagination.
Themes
◆Numerical Mysticismtheology
Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality.
Geometric dimensions and mathematical concepts like fluents and fluxions are used as the structural basis for explaining reality.
Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.
[auto] The text establishes an ontological opposition between the variable, unreal three-dimensional world and the constant, real four-dimensional reality.
The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.
[auto] It argues that despite apparent changes in matter, a single constant reality (the Linga-Sharîra or four-dimensional body) underlies all existence.