← Home
Tao Te Ching · 38 of 81 · tr. James Legge

Chapter 38

(Those who) possessed in highest degree the attributes (of the Tao) did not (seek) to show them, and therefore they possessed them (in fullest measure). (Those who) possessed in a lower degree those attributes (sought how) not to lose them, and therefore they did not possess them (in fullest measure). (Those who) possessed in the highest degree those attributes did nothing (with a purpose), and had no need to do anything. (Those who) possessed them in a lower degree were (always) doing, and had need to be so doing. (Those who) possessed the highest benevolence were (always seeking) to carry it out, and had no need to be doing so. (Those who) possessed the highest righteousness were (always seeking) to carry it out, and had need to be so doing. (Those who) possessed the highest (sense of) propriety were (always seeking) to show it, and when men did not respond to it, they bared the arm and marched up to them. Thus it was that when the Tao was lost, its attributes appeared; when its attributes were lost, benevolence appeared; when benevolence was lost, righteousness appeared; and when righteousness was lost, the proprieties appeared. Now propriety is the attenuated form of leal-heartedness and good faith, and is also the commencement of disorder; swift apprehension is (only) a flower of the Tao, and is the beginning of stupidity. Thus it is that the Great man abides by what is solid, and eschews what is flimsy; dwells with the fruit and not with the flower. It is thus that he puts away the one and makes choice of the other.
Themes
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Disorder is described as arising only when the Tao and its attributes are lost, framing negative states as a lack or absence of the good rather than positive entities.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The highest state is defined by negation—doing nothing, showing nothing, and having no need for action.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

[auto] Those with the highest attributes do not seek to display them, emphasizing concealment over revelation.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage explicitly outlines a descending hierarchy from the Tao to Propriety, where each level represents a loss of perfection and naturalness.

All passages →
Inner Silencepraxis

The practice of stilling the mind and speech to open receptivity to divine knowledge or presence.

[auto] The ideal state involves doing nothing and having no need for action, reflecting a state of stillness.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The text employs paradoxical logic where possessing the Tao is achieved through not seeking to show or do anything.

All passages →
Rejection Of Hypocrisyethics

Critique of outward religious observance that lacks inner transformation; form without substance.

[auto] The text critiques external propriety and forced righteousness as inferior to the natural, internal possession of Tao attributes.

All passages →
Wu Weipraxis

Effortless action aligned with the spontaneous flow of the Dao; non-coercive, non-striving conduct that yields results without forcing — the sage acts without acting.

[auto] The passage explicitly defines the highest virtue as doing nothing with purpose and having no need to act, which is the core definition of effortless action.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1f
Because, O Subhûti, the highest perfect knowledge of the holy and enlightened Tathâgatas is produced from it; the blessed Buddhas are produced from it. And why? Because, O Subhûti, when the Tathâgata preached: [1. See Childers, s.v. Lok…”
Both passages discuss the nature of highest virtues or qualities (Tao in Passage A, Buddha qualities in Passage B) and emphasize the importance of non-attachment and the emptiness of these qualities. They both highlight the idea that true enlightenment or virtue is not about possessing or displaying attributes, but rather transcending them.
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1p
If, O Subhûti, there existed a stock of merit, the Tathâgata would not have preached: "A stock of merit, a stock of merit indeed!"'(19) XX. 'What do you think then, O Subhûti, is a Tathâgata to be seen (known) by the shape of his visible b…”
Both passages explore the paradoxical nature of ultimate reality and the limitations of conceptual understanding. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena, including the Buddha's teachings and the concept of a self, while the Tao Te Ching discusses the transcendence of the Tao and the attenuation of its attributes into more conventional virtues.
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 11
p. 62 PYTHAGOREAN SENTENCES FROM THE PROTREPTICS OF IAMBLICHUS 1. As we live through soul, it must be said that by the virtue of this we live well; just as because we see through the eyes, we see well through the virtue of these. 2. It must…”
Both passages discuss the nature of higher virtues and the dangers of losing sight of the fundamental principles. The Tao Te Ching speaks of the Tao and its attributes, while the Pythagorean passage discusses the nature of God and the proper way to approach divine wisdom. Both emphasize the importance of substance over form and the dangers of superficial understanding.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 211 (part 1)
Section 5 5. There is, then a Providence, which permeates the Kosmos from first to last, not everywhere equal, as in a numerical distribution, but proportioned, differing, according to the grades of place- just as in some one animal, linke…”
Both passages discuss the nature of higher principles and their manifestation in individuals. The Tao Te Ching speaks of the Tao and its attributes, while Plotinus discusses the Reason-Principle and its phases, but both explore the idea of a higher, guiding principle that can be lost or diminished.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|Fifth Dialoguek
That is a maxim of the Epicureans which, being well understood, would not be considered so unworthy as the ignorant hold it to be, seeing that it does not detract from what I have called virtue, nor does it impair the perfection of firmness…”
Both passages discuss the highest virtues and states of being, emphasizing the importance of inner peace, detachment, and the absence of suffering or disturbance. They both advocate for a state of being where one is not affected by external circumstances, aligning with the concepts of the Tao and Epicurean philosophy.