← Home
Plato: Phaedrus · 14 of 38 · tr. Benjamin Jowett

Section 1n

The beginning of our proof is as follows:- The soul through all her being is immortal, for that which is ever in motion is immortal; but that which moves another and is moved by another, in ceasing to move ceases also to live. Only the self-moving, never leaving self, never ceases to move, and is the fountain and beginning of motion to all that moves besides. Now, the beginning is unbegotten, for that which is begotten has a beginning; but the beginning is begotten of nothing, for if it were begotten of something, then the begotten would not come from a beginning. But if unbegotten, it must also be indestructible; for if beginning were destroyed, there could be no beginning out of anything, nor anything out of a beginning; and all things must have a beginning. And therefore the self-moving is the beginning of motion; and this can neither be destroyed nor begotten, else the whole heavens and all creation would collapse and stand still, and never again have motion or birth. But if the self-moving is proved to be immortal, he who affirms that self-motion is the very idea and essence of the soul will not be put to confusion. For the body which is moved from without is soulless; but that which is moved from within has a soul, for such is the nature of the soul. But if this be true, must not the soul be the self-moving, and therefore of necessity unbegotten and immortal? Enough of the soul's immortality. Of the nature of the soul, though her true form be ever a theme of large and more than mortal discourse, let me speak briefly, and in a figure. And let the figure be composite-a pair of winged horses and a charioteer. Now the winged horses and the charioteers of the gods are all of them noble and of noble descent, but those of other races are mixed; the human charioteer drives his in a pair; and one of them is noble and of noble breed, and the other is ignoble and of ignoble breed; and the driving of them of necessity gives a great deal of trouble to him. I will endeavour to explain to you in what way the mortal differs from the immortal creature. The soul in her totality has the care of inanimate being everywhere, and traverses the whole heaven in divers forms appearing--when perfect and fully winged she soars upward, and orders the whole world; whereas the imperfect soul, losing her wings and drooping in her flight at last settles on the solid ground-there, finding a home, she receives an earthly frame which appears to be self-moved, but is really moved by her power; and this composition of soul and body is called a living and mortal creature. For immortal no such union can be reasonably believed to be; although fancy, not having seen nor surely known the nature of God, may imagine an immortal creature having both a body and also a soul which are united throughout all time. Let that, however, be as God wills, and be spoken of acceptably to him. And now let us ask the reason why the soul loses her wings! The wing is the corporeal element which is most akin to the divine, and which by nature tends to soar aloft and carry that which gravitates downwards into the upper region, which is the habitation of the gods. The divine is beauty, wisdom, goodness, and the like; and by these the wing of the soul is nourished, and grows apace; but when fed upon evil and foulness and the opposite of good, wastes and falls away.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The passage contrasts the soul's self-motion with the body's external motion, stating that the body is soulless and the union of soul and body results in mortality.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The text establishes a fundamental opposition between the immortal self-moving soul and the mortal composite of soul and body.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage explicitly defines evil as what causes the soul to lose its wings and fall away from divine beauty, framing it as a deprivation rather than a positive force.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

The wing of the soul is described as being nourished by beauty and goodness, implying an internal luminous quality dependent on divine attributes.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is referenced as the source from which the soul's wings are nourished and from which all creation originates.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The 'beginning' or self-moving principle is described as unbegotten and indestructible, functioning as a singular first source of motion and existence.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The passage describes the soul's ascent to the habitation of the gods where it orders the world in perfect form.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The author uses apparent contradictions such as 'unbegotten yet begotten' and 'self-moving yet moved' to illustrate the nature of the soul's immortality.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The soul is depicted as losing its wings when fed upon evil and falling away, implying a return to its divine origin through purification from such states.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The text links the soul's true nature to its self-motion and immortality, suggesting that knowing this essence is key to understanding one's state.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The passage describes the soul's movement from within to soar upward and order the world, contrasting with the descent of the mortal composite.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship with the divine or higher reality. They explore the immortality and the elevated nature of the soul, though from different theological perspectives.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 380
Section 1 1. Whether every human being is immortal or we are wholly destroyed, or whether something of us passes over to dissolution and destruction, while something else, that which is the true man, endures for ever- this question will be…”
Both passages discuss the immortality of the soul and its relationship to the body. They explore the idea that the soul is the essential, enduring part of a human being, while the body is transient and subject to decay.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 394
Section 10 10. (15) That the soul is of the family of the diviner nature, the eternal, is clear from our demonstration that it is not material: besides it has neither shape or colour nor is it tangible. But there are other proofs. Assuming…”
Both passages discuss the immortality and divine nature of the soul, emphasizing its connection to the divine and its purity. They share the idea that the soul is not material and is nourished by goodness and wisdom.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 395
Section 11 11. (16) What intelligent mind can doubt the immortality of such a value, one in which there is a life self-springing and therefore not to be destroyed? This is at any rate a life not imported from without, not present in the mod…”
Both passages discuss the immortality of the soul and its self-moving nature, presenting similar concepts of the soul as an independent, immortal principle. They share a philosophical exploration of the soul's essence and its relationship with life and motion.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 396
Section 12 12. (17) A further consideration is that if every soul is to be held dissoluble the universe must long since have ceased to be: if it is pretended that one kind of soul, our own for example, is mortal, and another, that of the Al…”
Both passages discuss the immortality and nature of the soul, emphasizing its self-moving and eternal qualities. They share the concept of the soul's indestructibility and its role in the cosmos, though they come from different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 418
Section 2 2. Let every soul recall, then, at the outset the truth that soul is the author of all living things, that it has breathed the life into them all, whatever is nourished by earth and sea, all the creatures of the air, the divine st…”
Both passages discuss the nature and immortality of the soul, emphasizing its role in animating and moving all things. They also describe the soul's divine and eternal qualities, though in different metaphorical frameworks.