← Home
Plato: Phaedo · 17 of 44 · tr. Benjamin Jowett

Section 1q

Then reflect, Cebes: is not the conclusion of the whole matter this?-that the soul is in the very likeness of the divine, and immortal, and intelligible, and uniform, and indissoluble, and unchangeable; and the body is in the very likeness of the human, and mortal, and unintelligible, and multiform, and dissoluble, and changeable. Can this, my dear Cebes, be denied? No, indeed. But if this is true, then is not the body liable to speedy dissolution? and is not the soul almost or altogether indissoluble? Certainly. And do you further observe, that after a man is dead, the body, which is the visible part of man, and has a visible framework, which is called a corpse, and which would naturally be dissolved and decomposed and dissipated, is not dissolved or decomposed at once, but may remain for a good while, if the constitution be sound at the time of death, and the season of the year favorable? For the body when shrunk and embalmed, as is the custom in Egypt, may remain almost entire through infinite ages; and even in decay, still there are some portions, such as the bones and ligaments, which are practically indestructible. You allow that? Yes. And are we to suppose that the soul, which is invisible, in passing to the true Hades, which like her is invisible, and pure, and noble, and on her way to the good and wise God, whither, if God will, my soul is also soon to go-that the soul, I repeat, if this be her nature and origin, is blown away and perishes immediately on quitting the body as the many say? That can never be, dear Simmias and Cebes. The truth rather is that the soul which is pure at departing draws after her no bodily taint, having never voluntarily had connection with the body, which she is ever avoiding, herself gathered into herself (for such abstraction has been the study of her life). And what does this mean but that she has been a true disciple of philosophy and has practised how to die easily? And is not philosophy the practice of death? Certainly. That soul, I say, herself invisible, departs to the invisible worldto the divine and immortal and rational: thither arriving, she lives in bliss and is released from the error and folly of men, their fears and wild passions and all other human ills, and forever dwells, as they say of the initiated, in company with the gods. Is not this true, Cebes? Yes, said Cebes, beyond a doubt. But the soul which has been polluted, and is impure at the time of her departure, and is the companion and servant of the body always, and is in love with and fascinated by the body and by the desires and pleasures of the body, until she is led to believe that the truth only exists in a bodily form, which a man may touch and see and taste and use for the purposes of his lusts-the soul, I mean, accustomed to hate and fear and avoid the intellectual principle, which to the bodily eye is dark and invisible, and can be attained only by philosophy-do you suppose that such a soul as this will depart pure and unalloyed? That is impossible, he replied. She is engrossed by the corporeal, which the continual association and constant care of the body have made natural to her. Very true.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The body is described as mortal, unintelligible, and dissoluble, contrasting sharply with the soul's immortality.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

A clear distinction is drawn between the immortal, divine soul and the mortal, corporeal body as opposing realms of existence.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The text emphasizes that the soul is invisible and departs to the invisible world of God.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage defines the soul's pollution as a lack of purity rather than an independent positive evil.

All passages →
Funerary Navigationpraxis

Texts and rituals guiding the soul through death.

The text describes the specific journey of the soul after death to Hades and the gods.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage links the soul's immortality and purity directly to the practice of philosophy and knowledge.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text describes the soul's arrival at the divine and her release from human ills into company with the gods.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage uses the paradoxical statement that philosophy is the practice of death to convey spiritual truth.

All passages →
Psychopomp Journeycosmology

Guided passage of the soul through afterlife realms.

The text details the soul's movement from the body to the invisible world and Hades under divine guidance.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The passage describes the soul's departure from the body and arrival at the divine origin.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The text states that the soul departs pure because she has been a true disciple of philosophy and practiced how to die easily.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The passage depicts the soul's movement from the corporeal world to the divine realm as an upward journey.

All passages →
Related passages · 47 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 14 (part 10)
When, then, death actually takes place, and separates the soul from the body, the poor soul will then cling to that thread and refuse to let go her hold of it, but all her essences are still deeply immersed in the wrath of God; she is tortu…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul after death and its relationship with the body. They share the idea that the soul is divine and immortal, and that its purity at the time of death determines its post-mortem state. However, they come from different mystical traditions, one Christian (Jacob Boehme) and the other Platonic (Plato).
egyptian|The Egyptian Book of the Dead (Papyrus of Ani)|Chapter 43 (part 44)
The preservation of the corruptible body too was in some way connected with the life in the world to come, and its preservation was necessary to ensure eternal life; otherwise the prayers recited to this end would have been futile, and the…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and the body, emphasizing the soul's immortality and the body's decay. They also touch on the idea of preservation and the afterlife, though from different cultural and religious perspectives.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VIII‡
“The soul is bound to the body, by a conversion to the passions arising from her union with it.” And, “the soul binds herself in the body.” Philolaus also says, that the ancient theologists and prophets asserted, ως δια τινας τιμωριας α ψυχ…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and the body, emphasizing the soul's purity and its separation from the body. They share the idea that the soul is divine and immortal, while the body is mortal and corruptible.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 8
Section 4 4. Let us consider, then, the hypothesis of a coalescence. Now if there is a coalescence, the lower is ennobled, the nobler degraded; the body is raised in the scale of being as made participant in life; the Soul, as associated wi…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and the body, emphasizing the soul's purity and the body's corruption. They share the idea that the soul is elevated and the body is degraded, with the soul being unaffected by the body's affections.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 92
Section 2 2. Supposing we accept this view and hold that, while things below the moon's orb have merely type-persistence, the celestial realm and all its several members possess individual eternity; it remains to show how this strict perman…”
Both passages explore the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, particularly in terms of permanence and impermanence. They share a conceptual parallel in discussing the immortality and purity of the soul versus the corporeal and changeable nature of the body.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 244 (part 2)
This reasoning would force the destructibility of Matter upon us: "the body is dissolved; then the Matter is dissolved." We would have to allow Matter to be a thing of quantity, a magnitude. But since it is not a magnitude it could not hav…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the distinction between the two. Plotinus argues that Matter is not subject to the same experiences as the body, while Plato describes the soul as divine, immortal, and intelligible, contrasting it with the mortal and changeable body.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 283
Section 1 1. In the Intellectual Kosmos dwells Authentic Essence, with the Intellectual-Principle [Divine Mind] as the noblest of its content, but containing also souls, since every soul in this lower sphere has come thence: that is the wor…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's divine and intellectual qualities and its separation from the corporeal world. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's purity and its journey after death.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 285 (part 1)
Section 1 1. In our attempt to elucidate the Essence of the soul, we show it to be neither a material fabric nor, among immaterial things, a harmony. The theory that it is some final development, some entelechy, we pass by, holding this t…”
Both passages explore the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's divine, indivisible, and eternal qualities in contrast to the body's material, divisible, and perishable nature. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's essence and its connection to the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 288
Section 1 1. The soul: what dubious questions concerning it admit of solution, or where we must abide our doubt- with, at least, the gain of recognizing the problem that confronts us- this is matter well worth attention. On what subject can…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's divine and immortal qualities. They both explore the idea of the soul's purity and its separation from the body, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 289 (part 1)
Section 2 2. To this our first answer is that to place certain things under one identical class- by admitting an identical range of operation- is to make them of one common species, and puts an end to all mention of part; the reasonable co…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul, emphasizing its unity, immateriality, and distinction from the body. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's purity and its connection to the divine.
37 more
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 289 (part 2)
In a line, no doubt, the part is inevitably a line; but even here there is a necessary difference in size; and if, in the case of the soul we similarly called upon magnitude as the distinction between constituents and collective soul, then…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body and the divine. They explore the idea of the soul's purity and its connection to the divine realm, though they come from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 290
Section 3 3. Is it a question of part in the sense that, taking one living being, the soul in a finger might be called a part of the soul entire? This would carry the alternative that either there is no soul outside of body, or that- no sou…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's unity and its higher, divine qualities. They both argue for the soul's indestructibility and its separation from the corporeal world, though they use different metaphors and philosophical frameworks.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 291
Section 4 4. But if this is the true account of the unity of soul, we must be able to meet the problems that ensue: firstly, the difficulty of one thing being present at the same moment in all things; and, secondly, the difficulty of soul i…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's purity and its potential separation from the body. They share a conceptual parallel in exploring the soul's immortality and its connection to the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 294
Section 7 7. So far, so good: but what of the passage in the Philebus taken to imply that the other souls are parts of the All-Soul? The statement there made does not bear the meaning read into it; it expresses only, what the author was the…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body and the divine. They share the idea that the soul is higher and more pure than the body, and that the soul's connection to the divine is central to its nature.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 295 (part 1)
Section 8 8. These considerations, amounting to the settlement of the question, are not countered by the phenomenon of sympathy; the response between soul and soul is due to the mere fact that all spring from that self-same soul [the next…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul, its relationship to the body, and its eternal or divine qualities. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's purity and its connection to a higher, divine realm.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 295 (part 2)
This means that it is no external limit that defines the individual being or the extension of souls any more than of God; on the contrary each in right of its own power is all that it chooses to be: and we are not to think of it as going fo…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's immortality and its separation from the physical realm. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's purity and its connection to the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 296 (part 1)
Section 9 9. But we must examine how soul comes to inhabit the body- the manner and the process- a question certainly of no minor interest. The entry of soul into body takes place under two forms. Firstly, there is the entry- metensomato…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the soul and the body, discussing the nature of the soul's interaction with the physical world and its transcendence beyond it. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's purity and its connection to the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 305
Section 18 18. There remains still something to be said on the question whether the soul uses deliberate reason before its descent and again when it has left the body. Reasoning is for this sphere; it is the act of the soul fallen into perp…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, particularly in the context of its existence before and after death. They share the idea that the soul is pure and divine, and that it operates differently when it is not bound to the body.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 306
Section 19 19. Are we to think of the indivisible phase of the soul and the divided as making one thing in a coalescence; or is the indivisible in a place of its own and under conditions of its own, the divisible being a sequent upon it, a…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the distinction between the indivisible, pure, and divine aspects of the soul and the divisible, corporeal, and mortal aspects of the body. They share a conceptual parallel in their exploration of the soul's purity and its separation from bodily influences.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 307 (part 1)
Section 20 20. Here a question rises to which we must find an answer: whether these and the other powers which we call "parts" of the Soul are situated, all, in place; or whether some have place and standpoint, others not; or whether again…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the soul and the body, emphasizing the soul's non-physical nature and its independence from the body. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's purity and its connection to the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 307 (part 2)
Because the soul is not seen and the body is: we perceive the body, and by its movement and sensation we understand that it is ensouled, and we say that it possesses a soul; to speak of residence is a natural sequence. If the soul were vis…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's invisibility and its higher, more enduring nature compared to the body. They both explore the idea that the soul is not bound by the physical form and has a divine or pure essence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 308
Section 21 21. What does all this come to? What answer do we give to him who, with no opinion of his own to assert, asks us to explain this presence? And what do we say to the question whether there is one only mode of presence of the entir…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the soul and the body, discussing the nature of the soul's presence and interaction with the body. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's purity and its separation from the corporeal world.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 311
Section 24 24. Now comes the question of the soul leaving the body; where does it go? It cannot remain in this world where there is no natural recipient for it; and it cannot remain attached to anything not of a character to hold it: it can…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul after death and its relationship to the body. They share the idea that the soul, when pure, transcends the bodily sphere and attains a divine or higher state, while an impure soul remains attached to the bodily realm.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 314
Section 27 27. But of what soul; of that which we envisage as the more divine, by which we are human beings, or that other which springs from the All? Memory must be admitted in both of these, personal memories and shared memories; and when…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, particularly in the context of death and the afterlife. They explore the idea of the soul's purity and memory, and how these factors influence its post-mortem existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 322
Section 2 2. Enough on that point: we come now to the question of memory of the personality? There will not even be memory of the personality; no thought that the contemplator is the self- Socrates, for example- or that it is Intellect or S…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship with the divine or intellectual realm. They emphasize the soul's purity, its separation from the body, and its union with a higher principle, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 338
Section 18 18. There remains the question whether the body possesses any force of its own- so that, with the incoming of the soul, it lives in some individuality- or whether all it has is this Nature we have been speaking of, the superior p…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and the body, emphasizing the higher nature of the soul and its detachment from the corporeal. They share the idea that the soul is pure and divine, while the body is mortal and subject to decay.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 349 (part 1)
Section 29 29. But- keeping to our illustration, by which the body is warmed by soul and not merely illuminated by it- how is it that when the higher soul withdraws there is no further trace of the vital principle? For a brief space there…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the soul and the body, particularly focusing on the nature of the soul's existence after the body's dissolution. They both suggest that the soul is more enduring and less tied to the physical form than the body, though they use different metaphors and philosophical frameworks.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 349 (part 2)
Here we have to enquire into the nature and being of that vestige of the soul actually present in the living body: if there is truly a soul, then, as a thing never cut off from its total, it will go with soul as soul must: if it is rather t…”
Both passages explore the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's purity and immortality. They share a conceptual parallel in their discussion of the soul's separation from the body and its divine nature.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 380
Section 1 1. Whether every human being is immortal or we are wholly destroyed, or whether something of us passes over to dissolution and destruction, while something else, that which is the true man, endures for ever- this question will be…”
Both passages discuss the immortality of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's divine and enduring nature in contrast to the body's mortal and perishable nature.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 382
Section 3 3. Anyone who rejects this view, and holds that either atoms or some entities void of part coming together produce soul, is refuted by the very unity of soul and by the prevailing sympathy as much as by the very coherence of the c…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's immortality and purity in contrast to the body's mortality and corruption. They share a philosophical exploration of the soul's transcendence over the physical realm.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 383
Section 4 4. Our opponents themselves are driven by stress of fact to admit the necessity of a prior to body, a higher thing, some phase or form of soul; their "pneuma" [finer-body or spirit] is intelligent, and they speak of an "intellectu…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its distinction from the body, emphasizing the soul's immaterial and divine qualities. They both argue for the soul's existence as a separate, higher entity distinct from the physical body.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 384
Section 5 5. Again, there is movement: all bodily movement is uniform; failing an incorporeal soul, how account for diversity of movement? Predilections, reasons, they will say; that is all very well, but these already contain that variety…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's incorporeal and immortal qualities. They both argue for the soul's transcendence over the physical body, though from different philosophical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 389
Section 8 8. B. (10) If the soul is body and permeates the entire body-mass, still even in this entire permeation the blending must be in accord with what occurs in all cases of bodily admixing. Now: if in the admixing of bodies neither con…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the incorporeal and immortal aspects of the soul. They both argue for the soul's purity and its separation from the bodily form, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 391
Section 8 8. D. (12) Soul belongs, then, to another Nature: What is this? Is it something which, while distinct from body, still belongs to it, for example a harmony or accord? The Pythagorean school holds this view thinking that the soul i…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's superiority and independence from the corporeal. They both argue for the soul's immortality and purity, contrasting it with the body's mortality and impermanence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 392 (part 1)
Section 8 8. E. (13) We come to the doctrine of the Entelechy, and must enquire how it is applied to soul. It is thought that in the Conjoint of body and soul the soul holds the rank of Form to the Matter which here is the ensouled body-…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's immortality and its distinction from the corporeal. They share a philosophical inquiry into the essence of the soul and its independence from the physical form.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 394
Section 10 10. (15) That the soul is of the family of the diviner nature, the eternal, is clear from our demonstration that it is not material: besides it has neither shape or colour nor is it tangible. But there are other proofs. Assuming…”
Both passages discuss the immortality and divine nature of the soul, emphasizing its separation from the body and its purity. They share the idea that the soul, when purified, ascends to a higher, divine realm and is characterized by wisdom and virtue.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 396
Section 12 12. (17) A further consideration is that if every soul is to be held dissoluble the universe must long since have ceased to be: if it is pretended that one kind of soul, our own for example, is mortal, and another, that of the Al…”
Both passages discuss the immortality and nature of the soul, emphasizing its divine likeness, intelligibility, and indissolubility, contrasting it with the mortal and changeable body. They share a philosophical exploration of the soul's eternal existence and its separation from the physical realm.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 402 (part 1)
Section 2 2. Enquiring, then, of Plato as to our own soul, we find ourselves forced to enquire into the nature of soul in general- to discover what there can be in its character to bring it into partnership with body, and, again, what this…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship with the body, emphasizing the soul's transcendence and purity. They share the idea that the soul is divine, immortal, and unaffected by the body's dissolution, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 410
Section 1 1. That the Soul of every individual is one thing we deduce from the fact that it is present entire at every point of the body- the sign of veritable unity- not some part of it here and another part there. In all sensitive beings…”
Both passages explore the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body and the universe. They share the concept of the soul's unity and its divine or pure nature, though they come from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 411
Section 2 2. Now to begin with, the unity of soul, mine and another's, is not enough to make the two totals of soul and body identical. An identical thing in different recipients will have different experiences; the identity Man, in me as I…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the soul and the body, emphasizing the soul's higher, more divine nature and its distinction from the corporeal. They both discuss the soul's purity and its connection to the divine, though they come from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 413
Section 4 4. These reflections should show that there is nothing strange in that reduction of all souls to one. But it is still necessary to enquire into the mode and conditions of the unity. Is it the unity of origin in a unity? And if so,…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's unity, purity, and immortality. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's origin and its connection to the divine, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 591
Section 1 1. How are we to explain the omnipresence of the soul? Does it depend upon the definite magnitude of the material universe coupled with some native tendency in soul to distribute itself over material mass, or is it a characteristi…”
Both passages explore the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's immaterial and immortal qualities. They share a philosophical inquiry into the soul's omnipresence and its distinction from the physical realm, though they come from different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 596
Section 6 6. But why does not one same soul enter more than one body? Because any second body must approach, if it might; but the first has approached and received and keeps. Are we to think that this second body, in keeping its soul with a…”
Both passages explore the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's purity and immortality. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's existence beyond the physical realm, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 673
Section 34 34. No longer can we wonder that the principle evoking such longing should be utterly free from shape. The very soul, once it has conceived the straining love towards this, lays aside all the shape it has taken, even to the Intel…”
Both passages discuss the soul's ascent to a divine or pure state, emphasizing the soul's separation from the body and its union with the divine. They share the theme of the soul's purity and its ultimate goal of achieving a higher, transcendent state.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 714
Section 10 10. But how comes the soul not to keep that ground? Because it has not yet escaped wholly: but there will be the time of vision unbroken, the self hindered no longer by any hindrance of body. Not that those hindrances beset that…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the divine or higher reality. They emphasize the soul's purity and its ability to transcend the physical body to achieve a state of unity with the divine, highlighting the transformative experience of the soul's ascent.
sufism|The Masnavi, Book I (Rumi)|PROLOGUEb
Knowest thou why thy mirror reflects not? Because the rust has not been scoured from its face. If it were purified from all rust and defilement, It would reflect the shining of the SUN Of GOD.6 O friends, ye have now heard this tale, Whic…”
Both passages discuss the purity of the soul or spirit and its relationship to the divine. They emphasize the need for the soul to be free from bodily or worldly impurities to reflect or unite with the divine, highlighting the concept of self-annihilation or purification as a path to divine union or eternal life.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVI (part 12)
He clearly affirms: I confess that I am very much inclined to assert the existence of immaterial natures in the world, and to put my soul itself into that class of beings. These immaterial beings . . . are immediately united with each o…”
Both passages discuss the dual nature of human existence, with the soul belonging to an immaterial or spiritual world and the body to the material world. They also explore the idea that the soul is immortal and continues to exist after the death of the body.