← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 589 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 562

Section 1 1. We have now explained our conception of Reality [True Being] and considered how far it agrees with the teaching of Plato. We have still to investigate the opposed principle [the principle of Becoming]. There is the possibility that the genera posited for the Intellectual sphere will suffice for the lower also; possibly with these genera others will be required; again, the two series may differ entirely; or perhaps some of the sensible genera will be identical with their intellectual prototypes, and others different- "identical," however, being understood to mean only analogous and in possession of a common name, as our results will make dear. We must begin on these lines: The subject of our discussion is the Sensible realm: Sensible Existence is entirely embraced by what we know as the Universe: our duty, then, would seem to be clear enough- to take this Universe and analyse its nature, classifying its constituent parts and arranging them by species. Suppose that we were making a division of speech: we should reduce its infinity to finite terms, and from the identity appearing in many instances evolve a unity, then another and another, until we arrived at some definite number; each such unit we should call a species if imposed upon individuals, a genus if imposed upon species. Thus, every species of speech- and similarly all phenomena- might be referred to a unity; speech- or element- might be predicated of them all. This procedure however is as we have already shown, impossible in dealing with the subject of our present enquiry. New genera must be sought for this Universe-genera distinct from those of the Intellectual, inasmuch as this realm is different from that, analogous indeed but never identical, a mere image of the higher. True, it involves the parallel existence of Body and Soul, for the Universe is a living form: essentially however Soul is of the Intellectual and does not enter into the structure of what is called Sensible Being. Remembering this fact, we must- however great the difficulty- exclude Soul from the present investigation, just as in a census of citizens, taken in the interests of commerce and taxation, we should ignore the alien population. As for the experiences to which Soul is indirectly subject in its conjunction with Body and by reason of Body's presence, their classification must be attempted at a later stage, when we enquire into the details of Sensible Existence.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The text defines the realm of True Being primarily by negating the presence of lower categories such as Time, Place, and Motion within it.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage centrally argues that True Being must be a unity and simplex, explicitly rejecting composite categories like Relation and Place.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage distinguishes between the 'higher sphere' of True Being and posterior entities like Motion, implying a hierarchical structure of reality.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] It states that dualities such as Action and Passivity do not exist as simplex in the higher sphere, indicating the transcendence of binary oppositions there.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] It asserts that a genus in the higher sphere must be a unity rather than a composite involving duality or multiplicity.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1d
And when I speak of the other division of the intelligible, you will understand me to speak of that other sort of knowledge which reason herself attains by the power of dialectic, using the hypotheses not as first principles, but only as hy…”
Both passages discuss the nature of reality and the distinction between the intelligible and sensible realms. They explore the hierarchical structure of existence and the methods of understanding it, though from different philosophical traditions.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1t
To which end we must consider the nature of fire, and water, and air, and earth, such as they were prior to the creation of the heaven, and what was happening to them in this previous state; for no one has as yet explained the manner of the…”
Both passages discuss the nature of reality and the classification of elements or principles within the universe. They explore the distinction between the intelligible and sensible realms, seeking to understand the fundamental components of existence. The conceptual parallel lies in their shared inquiry into the structure and nature of reality, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 124 (part 9)
The harmonising of them is to be found in the invisible operation of Heaven, and by following this on into the unlimited past. It is by this method that we can complete our years (without our minds being disturbed) 1 . 'What is meant by h…”
Both passages explore the nature of reality and the distinction between different realms of existence. Plotinus discusses the distinction between the Intellectual and Sensible realms, while Zhuangzi (the author of Book 124) explores the transformation and interconnection of different states of being, highlighting the fluidity and relativity of existence.