← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 460 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 439

Section 7 7. The contemplating of God, we might answer. But to admit its knowing God is to be compelled to admit its self-knowing. It will know what it holds from God, what God has given forth or may; with this knowledge, it knows itself at the stroke, for it is itself one of those given things- in fact is all of them. Knowing God and His power, then, it knows itself, since it comes from Him and carries His power upon it; if, because here the act of vision is identical with the object, it is unable to see God clearly, then all the more, by the equation of seeing and seen, we are driven back upon that self-seeing and self-knowing in which seeing and thing seen are undistinguishably one thing. And what else is there to attribute to it? Repose, no doubt; but, to an Intellectual-Principle, Repose is not an abdication from intellect; its Repose is an Act, the act of abstention from the alien: in all forms of existence repose from the alien leaves the characteristic activity intact, especially where the Being is not merely potential but fully realized. In the Intellectual-Principle, the Being is an Act and in the absence of any other object it must be self-directed; by this self-intellection it holds its Act within itself and upon itself; all that can emanate from it is produced by this self-centering and self-intention; first- self-gathered, it then gives itself or gives something in its likeness; fire must first be self-centred and be fire, true to fire's natural Act; then it may reproduce itself elsewhere. Once more, then; the Intellectual-Principle is a self-intent activity, but soul has the double phase, one inner, intent upon the Intellectual-Principle, the other outside it and facing to the external; by the one it holds the likeness to its source; by the other, even in its unlikeness, it still comes to likeness in this sphere, too, by virtue of action and production; in its action it still contemplates, and its production produces Ideal-forms- divine intellections perfectly wrought out- so that all its creations are representations of the divine Intellection and of the divine Intellect, moulded upon the archetype, of which all are emanations and images, the nearer more true, the very latest preserving some faint likeness of the source.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The argument proceeds by negating compound models of perception to define the nature of the divine or simple being.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The passage contrasts true self-knowing with knowledge derived from sense-perception of the bodily organism.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The passage distinguishes between sense, understanding, and the Intellectual-Principle, implying a hierarchy of cognitive faculties.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text emphasizes 'veritable self-cognition' and direct awareness of the Intellectual-Principle over sense perception.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

The distinction between the knower and the known is dissolved in the claim that self and content are simultaneously present.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The passage asserts that in the Intellectual-Principle, 'Self and content must be simultaneously present,' indicating non-duality of knower and known.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The text explicitly argues for an absolutely simplex entity with no parts or phases as the locus of true self-knowledge.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The description of an uncompounded, simple being aligns with the Neoplatonic concept of the Monad or the One.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

[auto] The passage centrally debates the possibility and nature of self-cognition in a simplex being.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 5, Section 1b
367 367 Sense-perception is a direct apprehension of that which we actually touch, see, hear, taste, or smell; Reason or Inference is an indirect apprehension of that which we do not actually touch, see, etc. Intuition is a direct apprehen…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine knowledge and the relationship between the divine and the created. They explore the idea of self-knowledge and the emanation of divine attributes into the world, though from different mystical traditions.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 7, Section 1d
Furthermore, we must ask how it is that we know God when He cannot be perceived by the mind or the senses and is not a particular Being. Perhaps ‘tis true to say that we know not God by His Nature (for this is unknowable and beyond the rea…”
Both passages explore the concept of knowing the divine through self-knowledge and the emanation of divine attributes. They discuss the relationship between the divine and the created world, emphasizing the idea that the divine is both knowable and unknowable.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 3)
7.) "I do not wish to divert men from the Word as it is written and taught; but my writings are intended to lead them from a merely historical belief to a living faith, even to Jesus Christ (the Light and Truth) Himself. All preaching and…”
Both passages explore the concept of self-knowledge and the nature of the self. Passage A discusses the self-knowledge of an uncompounded being, while Passage B talks about real spiritual knowledge coming from the awakening of the spirit within oneself. Both emphasize the importance of inner awareness and the nature of the self in understanding higher truths.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 2)
91 "Christ never said, 'I, in my human selfhood, am the voice of God, I am speaking as God, in or with God,' &c.; but He said, 'The words which I speak are the Father's, who lives in me '—that is to say, who lives in my human or natural sel…”
Both passages explore the nature of self-awareness and self-knowledge in divine or intellectual beings. Passage A discusses the self-knowledge of an uncompounded being, while Passage B describes the self-awareness and perfection of God. Both emphasize the intrinsic nature of self-knowledge within the divine.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 1: Poimandres|Section 1b
But when He raised His head, I see in Mind the Light, [but] now in Powers no man could number, and Cosmos grown beyond all bounds, and that the Fire was compassed round about by a most mighty Power, and [now] subdued had come unto a stand.…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine intellect or Mind, its self-awareness, and its role in creation. They also explore the emanation of lesser beings or forms from the divine source, highlighting the hierarchical structure of reality.
Select Works, Section 439 — Select Works of Plotinus — Guru