← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 289 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 276 (part 2)

It cannot be, itself, The Good, since then it would not need to see or to perform any other Act; for The Good is the centre of all else, and it is by means of The Good that every thing has Act, while the Good is in need of nothing and therefore possesses nothing beyond itself. Once you have uttered "The Good," add no further thought: by any addition, and in proportion to that addition, you introduce a deficiency. Do not even say that it has Intellection; you would be dividing it; it would become a duality, Intellect and the Good. The Good has no need of the Intellectual-Principle which, on the contrary, needs it, and, attaining it, is shaped into Goodness and becomes perfect by it: the Form thus received, sprung from the Good, brings it to likeness with the Good. Thus the traces of the Good discerned upon it must be taken as indication of the nature of that Archetype: we form a conception of its Authentic Being from its image playing upon the Intellectual-Principle. This image of itself, it has communicated to the Intellect that contemplates it: thus all the striving is on the side of the Intellect, which is the eternal striver and eternally the attainer. The Being beyond neither strives, since it feels no lack, nor attains, since it has no striving. And this marks it off from the Intellectual-Principle, to which characteristically belongs the striving, the concentrated strain towards its Form. Yet: The Intellectual-Principle; beautiful; the most beautiful of all; lying lapped in pure light and in clear radiance; circumscribing the Nature of the Authentic Existents; the original of which this beautiful world is a shadow and an image; tranquil in the fullness of glory since in it there is nothing devoid of intellect, nothing dark or out of rule; a living thing in a life of blessedness: this, too, must overwhelm with awe any that has seen it, and penetrated it, to become a unit of its Being. But: As one that looks up to the heavens and sees the splendour of the stars thinks of the Maker and searches, so whoever has contemplated the Intellectual Universe and known it and wondered for it must search after its Maker too. What Being has raised so noble a fabric? And where? And how? Who has begotten such a child, this Intellectual-Principle, this lovely abundance so abundantly endowed? The Source of all this cannot be an Intellect; nor can it be an abundant power: it must have been before Intellect and abundance were; these are later and things of lack; abundance had to be made abundant and Intellection needed to know. These are very near to the un-needing, to that which has no need of Knowing, they have abundance and intellection authentically, as being the first to possess. But, there is that before them which neither needs nor possesses anything, since, needing or possessing anything else, it would not be what it is- the Good.
Themes
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The Source is described as distinct from and preceding the 'All,' implying a transcendence beyond the known totality.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The passage begins by characterizing the emanation as 'Life,' suggesting a dynamic divine quality.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

The Intellectual-Principle is mentioned as a begotten entity below the Source, functioning as a mediating ordering principle in the hierarchy.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The nature of the Source is defined by negation, stating it 'cannot be the All' and is 'not a plurality.'

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage centrally argues that the engendering Principle must be 'not a plurality' and 'more simplex' than its effects.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage explicitly describes a chain of being where Life and Intellect derive from a higher Principle that does not emanate but is the source of emanation.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The text argues for a first Principle that is 'more simplex' than the Intellectual-Principle and is the 'Source of plurality,' fitting the definition of an undivided first principle.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The text posits a single Source of plurality that precedes the total of things, emphasizing ultimate unity over multiplicity.

All passages →
Related passages · 8 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1i
The Godhead is not a Whole because it is indivisible, nor a Part because there is nothing, on the ultimate plane, outside It. Yet It is a Whole because It includes the true existence of all things, and is Partitive because It contains the…”
Both passages describe a transcendent, ultimate reality (The Good in Plotinus and The Godhead in the second passage) that is beyond intellect, form, and all other attributes. They both emphasize the ineffable nature of this ultimate reality and its role as the source of all perfection and existence.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1a
CHAPTER IV Concerning ” Good ,” ” Light ,” ” Beautiful ,” “ Desire ,” ” Ecstasy ,” “ Jealousy .” Also that Evil is neither existent nor Sprung from anything existent nor inherent in existent things . 1. Now let us consider the name of “Go…”
Both passages discuss the concept of The Good as a transcendent, self-sufficient entity that is the source of all existence and perfection. They both emphasize that The Good does not need anything else and is beyond intellect and form.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Mystical Theology|Chapter IIa
How it is necessary to be united with and render praise to Him Who is the cause of all and above all. Unto this Darkness which is beyond Light we pray that we may come, and may attain unto vision through the loss of sight and knowledge, an…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the ultimate reality (The Good in Plotinus, God in the second passage) as being beyond intellect, perception, and understanding. They both emphasize the need to transcend ordinary knowledge to grasp this ultimate reality.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 5: The Discourse of Hermes to Asclepius|Section 1c
And for this cause hath He all names, in that they are one Father's. And for this cause hath He Himself no nome, in that He's Father of [them] all. Who, then, may sing Thee praise of Thee, or [praise] to Thee? Whither, again, am I to tur…”
Both passages explore the concept of a supreme, transcendent being that is the source of all existence. They discuss the nature of this being as prior to and beyond all things, yet encompassing all things, though they do so within different philosophical and theological frameworks.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 9: The Decalogue|Section 1c
This is God's sense-and-thought, ever to move all things. And never time shall be when e'en a whit of things that are shall cease; and when I say "a whit of things that are", I mean a whit of God. For thigs that are, God hath; nor aught […”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as the source and sustainer of all things, emphasizing the unity and simplicity of the divine principle. They share a mystical perspective on the relationship between the divine and the created world.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 11: The Hymn|Section 1c
It must, then, be that such a one as this must be some one who's wholly One. 9. For as the many motions of them [all] are different, and as their bodies are not like, yet has one speed been ordered for them all, it is impossible that ther…”
Both passages explore the concept of a singular, ultimate source or principle from which all things emanate or are created. They discuss the nature of this principle as being simple, prior to all things, and the cause of life and existence, demonstrating a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
taoism|Tao Te Ching|Chapter 2
All in the world know the beauty of the beautiful, and in doing this they have (the idea of) what ugliness is; they all know the skill of the skilful, and in doing this they have (the idea of) what the want of skill is. So it is that existe…”
Both passages explore the nature of the ultimate reality or the Good, emphasizing its transcendence and the inability to fully comprehend it through intellect or language. They also discuss the relationship between the ultimate reality and the intellect or the world, highlighting the dependence of the latter on the former.
taoism|Tao Te Ching|Chapter 4
The Tao is (like) the emptiness of a vessel; and in our employment of it we must be on our guard against all fulness. How deep and unfathomable it is, as if it were the Honoured Ancestor of all things! We should blunt our sharp points, and…”
Both passages explore the nature of a transcendent, ultimate reality (Tao in Passage A and The Good in Passage B) that is beyond description and need. They emphasize the ineffable and self-sufficient nature of this ultimate principle.
Select Works, Section 276 (part 2) — Select Works of Plotinus — Guru