← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 164 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 170

Section 14 14. In yet another way they infringe still more gravely upon the inviolability of the Supreme. In the sacred formulas they inscribe, purporting to address the Supernal Beings- not merely the Soul but even the Transcendents- they are simply uttering spells and appeasements and evocations in the idea that these Powers will obey a call and be led about by a word from any of us who is in some degree trained to use the appropriate forms in the appropriate way- certain melodies, certain sounds, specially directed breathings, sibilant cries, and all else to which is ascribed magic potency upon the Supreme. Perhaps they would repudiate any such intention: still they must explain how these things act upon the unembodied: they do not see that the power they attribute to their own words is so much taken away from the majesty of the divine. They tell us they can free themselves of diseases. If they meant, by temperate living and an appropriate regime, they would be right and in accordance with all sound knowledge. But they assert diseases to be Spirit-Beings and boast of being able to expel them by formula: this pretension may enhance their importance with the crowd, gaping upon the powers of magicians; but they can never persuade the intelligent that disease arises otherwise than from such causes as overstrain, excess, deficiency, putrid decay; in a word, some variation whether from within or from without. The nature of illness is indicated by its very cure. A motion, a medicine, the letting of blood, and the disease shifts down and away; sometimes scantiness of nourishment restores the system: presumably the Spiritual power gets hungry or is debilitated by the purge. Either this Spirit makes a hasty exit or it remains within. If it stays, how does the disease disappear, with the cause still present? If it quits the place, what has driven it out? Has anything happened to it? Are we to suppose it throve on the disease? In that case the disease existed as something distinct from the Spirit-Power. Then again, if it steps in where no cause of sickness exists, why should there be anything else but illness? If there must be such a cause, the Spirit is unnecessary: that cause is sufficient to produce that fever. As for the notion, that just when the cause presents itself, the watchful Spirit leaps to incorporate itself with it, this is simply amusing. But the manner and motive of their teaching have been sufficiently exhibited; and this was the main purpose of the discussion here upon their Spirit-Powers. I leave it to yourselves to read the books and examine the rest of the doctrine: you will note all through how our form of philosophy inculcates simplicity of character and honest thinking in addition to all other good qualities, how it cultivates reverence and not arrogant self-assertion, how its boldness is balanced by reason, by careful proof, by cautious progression, by the utmost circumspection- and you will compare those other systems to one proceeding by this method. You will find that the tenets of their school have been huddled together under a very different plan: they do not deserve any further examination here.
Themes
Aeonscosmology

Divine archetypal beings or eternal attributes dwelling within the Pleroma, often arranged in male-female syzygies.

The term 'Primal Beings' corresponds to the Gnostic concept of Aeons discussed in Plotinus's critique.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The mention of a 'process' referring to 'Primal Beings' implies a hierarchical flow or chain of existence.

All passages →
Fall Of Sophiacosmology

The Gnostic myth of Wisdom's prolapse from the Pleroma — her unilateral desire or error producing the Demiurge and the entrapment of divine sparks in matter.

The attribution of inherent guilt to divine beings reflects the mythological error or fall associated with Sophia in Gnostic cosmology.

All passages →
Related passages · 0 parallels · 6 contrasts
gnosticism|Pistis Sophia|Document THIRDcCONTRASTS
Say unto them, Renounce the villainies, and be worthy of the mysteries of the Light, and be delivered from all the [237 ] demons of Ialtabaoth with all his punishments. Say unto them, Renounce the senselessness, and be worthy of the myster…”
Both passages address the use of spiritual or mystical practices, but they take opposing stances. Passage A criticizes the use of magical formulas and spells, emphasizing rational and reverent approaches to the divine. Passage B, on the other hand, advocates for the use of specific renunciations and practices to achieve deliverance and access to the mysteries of the Light.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|6. Magical EquilibriumdCONTRASTS
It is a fatal and inevitable operation, directed and made still more calamitous by elementary spirits and suffering souls, whose restless wills seek out sympathies in our weakness and tempt us, but not so much to destroy us as to win friend…”
Both passages discuss the nature and effects of magical practices, but they take opposing stances. Plotinus criticizes the use of magical formulas and spells, arguing that they diminish the majesty of the divine and are based on false premises. In contrast, the second passage from '6. Magical Equilibrium' describes the real and dangerous power of magical practices, emphasizing the need for caution and proper understanding to avoid harmful consequences.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic II: The Ritual (Éliphas Lévi)|2. Magical EquilibriumcCONTRASTS
Thus, the Magus should not live altogether in his laboratory, among his Atha-nors, Elixirs and Pantacles. However riveting be the glance of that Circe who is called occult power, we must be able to confront her on occasion with the sword o…”
Both passages discuss the use of magical practices and their efficacy, but they take opposing stances. Passage A criticizes magical practices as undermining the divine and advocates for rational, philosophical approaches. Passage B, however, defends and explains the necessity of magical equilibrium and the proper use of magical rites.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic II: The Ritual (Éliphas Lévi)|2. Magical EquilibriumdCONTRASTS
Nor is such observance vain, for in the magical work all instruments of art are magnetized by the operator; the air is charged with his perfumes, the fire which he has consecrated is subject to his will, the forces of Nature seem to hear an…”
Both passages discuss the use of magical practices and their efficacy, but they take opposing stances. Passage A critiques the idea of magical spells and evocations, arguing that diseases have natural causes and that magical practices diminish the majesty of the divine. Passage B, on the other hand, describes the power of magical practices and their ability to influence natural forces, while acknowledging the suppression of such practices by certain religions.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic II: The Ritual (Éliphas Lévi)|3. The Triangle Of PantaclesbCONTRASTS
Nature is not outraged with impunity, and no one can play safely with unknown and incalculable forces. It is this consideration which has led and will ever lead us to deny the vain curiosity of those who would see in order that they may be…”
Both passages discuss the use of rituals and invocations, but they take opposing stances. Plotinus criticizes the use of magical practices and spells, arguing that they diminish the majesty of the divine and are based on false premises. In contrast, the second passage defends the use of magical rituals and invocations, describing their symbolic significance and practical applications in Kabbalistic and Gnostic traditions.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic II: The Ritual (Éliphas Lévi)|10. The Key Of OccultismaCONTRASTS
Let us now examine the question of Pantacles, for all magical virtue is there, since the secret of force is in the intelligence which directs. We have given the symbol and interpretation of the Pantacles of Pythagoras and Ezekiel, so that…”
Both passages discuss the use of magical practices and their validity, but they take opposing stances. Passage A criticizes the use of magical formulas and spells, arguing that they diminish the majesty of the divine and are not effective in curing diseases. Passage B, on the other hand, defends the use of Pantacles and magical symbols, asserting their efficacy and importance in focusing intellectual force and projecting will.