← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 113 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter XVII

What, therefore, shall we derive from the Gods who are entirely exempt from all human generation, with respect to sterility, or abundance or any thing else pertaining to [the mortal] life? Nothing whatever. For it is not the province of those who are liberated from all things to meddle with gifts of this kind. 254 But if some one should say that the perfectly immaterial comprehend in themselves the material Gods, and that through this they also contain in themselves their gifts according to one first cause; such a one will also say, that in consequence of this an abundance of divine gifts descend from the immaterial Gods. It must not, however, be granted to any one to say that the immaterial Gods bestow these gifts by proximately interfering with the actions of human life. For such an administration of our affairs is partible, is accomplished with a certain conversion [to the subjects of its care], is not entirely separate from bodies, and is incapable of receiving a pure and undefiled domination. Will not, therefore, that mode of sacrifice in works of this kind be most appropriate which is mingled with bodies, and adheres to generation; and not that which is entirely immaterial and incorporeal? For the pure mode of sacrifice is perfectly transcendent and incommensurate [with our concerns]. But the mode which employs bodies, and the powers that subsist through bodies, is in the most eminent degree allied to human affairs. It is also capable of producing a certain prosperous condition of things, and of imparting symmetry and temperament to the mortal race. 255
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text describes the Gods as entirely exempt from human generation and incapable of receiving pure domination, negating positive categories like sterility or abundance.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The passage argues that the immaterial Gods are incapable of receiving pure domination and that material sacrifice is necessary for human affairs.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

A clear distinction is drawn between immaterial Gods and material life, bodies, and generation as separate realms of existence.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The Gods are described as entirely exempt from human generation and transcendent, residing outside the sphere of mortal affairs.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The text mentions a 'first cause' through which material Gods contain their gifts, implying a downward flow from a higher source.

All passages →
Ritual Puritypraxis

The maintenance of a state of cleanliness—physical, moral, or spiritual—required for encounter with the divine.

The text contrasts a pure mode of sacrifice with one that is mingled with bodies, emphasizing the requirement for purity in divine encounter.

All passages →
Theurgypraxis

Iamblichean ritual practice that engages the gods directly through consecrated material symbols and actions, on the premise that divine power descends into properly prepared matter — distinct from philosophical contemplation alone.

The passage centrally argues that sacrifices must be mingled with bodies and adhere to generation to properly engage human affairs and divine gifts.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1b
Plotinus says the Godhead is indivisibly divided. doth not leave Its own Unity, but, even in the act of going forth to all things, remains entirely within Itself through the excess of that all-transcendent Unity: concerning these things ‘t…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its interaction with the material world. They explore the idea of the divine being transcendent yet immanent, and the manner in which divine gifts or influences are bestowed upon the material realm. The passages share a conceptual parallel in their mystical approach to understanding the divine.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1g
Their ultimate nature, which they possess in their own original being, is beyond Mind and beyond all Being and Knowledge. 203 203 Even the Differentiations finally lead us up into the Undifferenced Godhead Where they transcend themselves.…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to the material world, emphasizing the transcendence of the ultimate divine reality and the mediated nature of divine gifts or influences. They share a conceptual parallel in their exploration of how the immaterial or transcendent divine interacts with the material or human realm.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 5, Section 1c
You would have expected those which participate in God’s greater gifts to be the higher, and to surpass the rest.” Now if intelligent beings were defined as having no 134 Existence or Life, the argument would be sound; but since the divine…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the divine and the material world, emphasizing the transcendent nature of the divine while acknowledging its influence on the material realm. They both explore the idea of divine gifts and the manner in which they are bestowed, though from different philosophical and religious perspectives.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 8, Section 1b
From this Source come the Godlike Powers of the Angelic Orders; from this Source they immutably possess their being and all the ceaseless and immortal motions of their spiritual life; and their very stability and unfailing desire for the Go…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the divine and the material world, emphasizing the transcendent nature of the divine while acknowledging its influence on the material realm. They both explore the idea of divine gifts or powers descending to the material world without direct intervention.