← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 59 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter XIII

Let us, therefore, now direct our attention to another species of divination, which is not public, but of a private nature, concerning 147 which you say, “ that some become enthusiastic by standing on characters, as those that are filled from the intromission of spirits .” This species, therefore, through those who badly use it, cannot easily be comprehended in one definition. But it is obvious and superficial, and known to many, and employs a falsehood and deception which are not to be endured; nor is it at all attended with the presence of a certain divinity, but it produces a certain motion of the soul, which is adverse to the Gods, and attracts from them an obscure and adumbrative representation, which, through the evanescent nature of its power, is usually disturbed by dæmoniacal depraved spirits. That, however, which is truly a representation of the Gods, is in other respects genuine and pure, immutable and true, and is inaccessible to, and unimpeded by, spirits of a contrary nature. For, as darkness is not adapted to sustain the splendour of the glittering light of the sun, but suddenly becomes totally invisible, entirely recedes, and immediately vanishes; thus, also, when the power of the Gods, which fills all things with good, abundantly shines forth, no place is left for the tumult of evil spirits, nor can it present itself to the view; but, as if it was nothing, it departs into nonentity, not being able to be at all moved, when more excellent natures are present, 148 or to disturb [66] such natures in their illuminations. 149 Since, therefore, these differ so greatly, I shall not use any other indications, in order to distinguish them, than those which are adduced by you. For when you say, “ some standing on characters ,” you seem to signify nothing else than the cause of all the evils pertaining to these things. For there are some who, neglecting the whole business of the telesiurgic theory, both concerning the invoking [priest] and the inspector ( εποπτης ), and also despising the order of religion, and the most holy endurance of labours for a long time, and rejecting the sacred laws and ordinances, and other religious ceremonies, think that the standing on characters is alone sufficient, and that by doing 150 this for one hour, they can cause a certain spirit to enter; though how is it possible that any thing beautiful or perfect can be effected by these? Or how, by ephemeral works, can a contact he produced with the eternal and true essence of the Gods in sacred deeds? Through these things, therefore, it appears that such like rash men entirely err, and that they do not deserve to be ranked among diviners.
Themes
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The text contrasts the 'splendour of the glittering light' of the Gods with 'darkness' and 'evil spirits'.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The divine presence is described as 'inaccessible to... spirits of a contrary nature' and 'not being able to be at all moved'.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

The passage uses the metaphor of the sun's light shining forth abundantly to describe the divine power filling all things with good.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Evil spirits are described as 'ephemeral' and unable to disturb 'more excellent natures' when divine light shines.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage distinguishes between a 'genuine and pure' representation of the Gods versus deceptive motion of the soul.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The text warns that the species of divination is 'not public' and requires understanding beyond superficial indicators.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Gods are described as actively filling all things with good and shining forth abundantly.

All passages →
Ritual Puritypraxis

The maintenance of a state of cleanliness—physical, moral, or spiritual—required for encounter with the divine.

The passage emphasizes the necessity of 'sacred laws and ordinances' and 'holy endurance of labours' for genuine divination.

All passages →
Theurgypraxis

Iamblichean ritual practice that engages the gods directly through consecrated material symbols and actions, on the premise that divine power descends into properly prepared matter — distinct from philosophical contemplation alone.

The passage explicitly discusses 'telesiurgic theory', the role of priests and inspectors, and the efficacy of sacred deeds in engaging divine power.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 1, Section 1e
These mysteries we learn from the Divine Scriptures, and thou wilt find that in well-nigh all the utterances of the Sacred Writers the Divine Names refer in a Symbolical Revelation 72 72 ἐκφαντορικῶς καὶ ὑμνητικῶς. to Its beneficent Emanat…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine revelation and the distinction between genuine and false spiritual experiences. They emphasize the purity and immutability of true divine presence and the deception of false practices.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Mystical Theology|Chapter Ib
They are useful and necessary up to a point, but the Truth lies beyond them and is to be apprehended to a supernatural manner by what later writers call “infused” contemplation. The sum of the whole matter is that God is incomprehensible.…”
Both passages discuss the limitations of human understanding and the need to transcend conventional methods to apprehend the divine. They emphasize the incomprehensibility of the divine and the necessity of a higher, mystical experience to grasp it.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|Third Dialoguea
. Tansillo . There are several varieties of enthusiasts, which may all be reduced to two kinds. While some only display blindness, stupidity, and irrational impetuosity, which tend towards savage madness, others by divine abstraction bec…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine inspiration and the distinction between genuine and false forms of enthusiasm. They both highlight the importance of proper religious practice and the presence of divine entities, contrasting true divine inspiration with deceptive or impure forms.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|21. Divinationc
It is by imagination assuredly that we see, and this is the natural aspect of the miracle; but we see true things, and in this consists the marvellous aspect of the natural work. We appeal to the experience of all veritable adepts. The au…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divination and the distinction between genuine and false practices. They emphasize the importance of proper methods and the presence of divine or spiritual entities in true divination, contrasting it with superficial or deceptive practices.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic II: The Ritual (Éliphas Lévi)|21. The Science Of The Prophetsa
THIS chapter is consecrated to divination, which, in its broadest sense, and following the grammatical significance of the word, is the exercise of divine power, and the realization of divine knowledge. It is the priesthood of the Magus.…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divination and the distinction between genuine and false practices. They share a conceptual parallel in critiquing superficial or deceptive methods of divination and emphasizing the importance of true, divine connection.