← Home
Orphic Hymns · 73 of 138 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Hymn XXXI. PALLAS (part 2)

Some are the causes of conversion to inferiors, and of collecting the multitude of progressive natures to their proper principles: while others promote their progression and procreation, emanating from principles, as their source. Some supply the power of generating to inferiors; and others exhibit a constant and undefiled purity. There are some, again, containing the cause of separable goods; and others, of such goods as subsist together with their recipients. Indeed, after this manner, the various contrariety of such kinds appears in all the administrations of true being. Thus the station or quiet of things constantly establishing being in themselves, resists efficacious and vital powers of motion. So the communication of identity, on every side similar to itself (if the expression may be allowed) is specially opposed to the discretions of diversity. Thus, too, similitude fights with dissimilitude, and equality with inequality. Since this is the case, can it be wonderful, that mythologists, perceiving a contrariety of this kind among the Gods, and the first principles p. 159 of things, should represent it to their pupils by contentions and wars? For though the divine genera are always united with each other, yet they preside as well over those who administer to union, as over those who machinate confusion. And this is the first reason of the wars of the Gods. But it is lawful to produce another reason, and to affirm that the Gods are indeed indivisibly conjoined, and subsist together in mutual uniformity: but that their progressions into the universe, and participations by recipient natures, become disjoined and divisible, and by this means filled with contrariety. For things subject to the power of the Gods, cannot receive their diffused powers, and multiform illustrations, without mixture and confusion. Hence the last orders dependent on the Gods, since they are produced by a long interval from the first causes, but are contiguous to the concerns they administer, and adhere to matter, contract contrariety, and an all-various division; partially presiding over material affairs, and diminishing and dispersing those separate powers, which before subsisted in a superior manner, uniformly and indivisibly, in their primitive causes. Since, then, such and so many are the ways, by which, according to the mysteries of theologists, war is usually referred to the Gods; other poets who, seized with fury, have interpreted divine concerns, introduced the battles and wars of the Gods, according to the first reasons, i. e. so far as the divine genera admit of diversity, according to the first principles of all things. For fables, concealing truth under a veil, shew that such things as recall to principles , oppose and fight with the authors of generation: collecting with separating natures, things unifying with such as multiply by the progression of beings; and universal genera, with such as operate in a partial and particular manner. Hence they relate, that the Titans (or dæmons subservient to Nature) fight with Bacchus, (or Nature) and the giants with Jove. p. 160 For union, and an indivisible work, is proper to Bacchus and Jupiter, as the demiurgic causes of the world; but the Titans and Giants produce the demiurgic powers into multitude; partially administering the concerns of the universe, and existing as the proximate parents of material natures." Thus far Proclus. For a farther account of Minerva, see the note to Hymn ix. to Nature.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The hymn describes the Goddess as both ineffable and effable, transcending simple definition.

All passages →
Demiurgecosmology

A secondary creator deity—often ignorant or malevolent—responsible for fashioning the material world, distinct from the supreme transcendent God.

[auto] The commentary explicitly identifies Bacchus and Jupiter as demiurgic causes of the world.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The text explicitly states the Gods are indivisibly conjoined and subsist in mutual uniformity without parts.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The footnotes describe divine genera and progressions flowing from first principles and causes.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

[auto] The passage explains that fables conceal truth under a veil, requiring interpretation of mysteries by theologists.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The footnotes explicitly reference three zoogonic or vivific monads including Minerva.

All passages →
Related passages · 19 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1b
Plotinus says the Godhead is indivisibly divided. doth not leave Its own Unity, but, even in the act of going forth to all things, remains entirely within Itself through the excess of that all-transcendent Unity: concerning these things ‘t…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine unity and its relationship with multiplicity and contrariety. They explore how the divine remains indivisible while manifesting in diverse and sometimes opposing forms, reflecting a deep conceptual parallel in their mystical insights.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VIIIa
But neither must we admit that cause of the distinction of these genera which you subjoin, viz. “ that it is an arrangement with reference to different bodies; as, for instance, 39 of Gods to etherial bodies, but of dæmons to aerial bodies…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine genera and their relationship to the material world, emphasizing the distinction between superior and inferior natures and the principle of order and measure derived from primary to secondary beings. They share a mystical perspective on the hierarchy and interaction of divine and material realms.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter IXb
For in things which are of a kindred nature, according to essence and power, or which are, in a certain respect, of the same species, or homogeneous, a certain comprehension, or conservation, may be discovered. But in such things as are en…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine participation and the distribution of divine powers into the world, exploring how different entities interact with and manifest these powers. They share a conceptual framework of hierarchical and differentiated divine influences.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XVIIIa
Your next inquiry doubts, “ how some of the Gods are beneficent, but others malefic .” This opinion, therefore, is assumed from the predictors of nativities. It is, however, entirely remote from the truth. For all the Gods are good, and i…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine powers and their interaction with the material world, emphasizing the unity and goodness of the Gods despite the apparent malefic effects observed in the physical realm. They both explore the concept of participation and the distortion that occurs when divine powers are received by material substances.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XIXb
And secondary genera, indeed, remain with invariable sameness in the one of such as are primary; but the primary impart from themselves union to the secondary genera, and all of them possess in each other the communion of an indissoluble co…”
Both passages discuss the union and interaction between different levels of divine beings, emphasizing the interconnectedness and hierarchical order of the divine realms. They explore the relationship between intelligible and visible Gods, and how these relationships manifest in the universe.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter III
Dissolving, however, the doubts in a way still more true, we think it requisite, in invoking superior natures, to take away the evocations 208 which appear to be directed to them as to men, and also the mandates in the performance of works,…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine operations and the unity or contrariety of divine principles. They explore the idea that divine works are accomplished through sameness and union rather than through contrariety, and they both address the concept of divine wars or conflicts as symbolic representations of these principles.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VII
Moreover, it is necessary to add the causes whence evils [90] sometimes arise, and to show how many and of what kind they are. For the form of them is not simple; but, being various, is the leader of the generation of various evils. For if…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine beings and their relationship to evil or contrariety. They explore how divine and demonic entities interact with justice and injustice, truth and falsehood, and the causes of various evils or conflicts, showing a conceptual parallel in their mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XII
It is, necessary, however, to discuss these things particularly, and to show how they subsist, and what reason they possess. It is requisite, therefore, to understand that the universe is one animal; and that the parts in it are, indeed, se…”
Both passages discuss the interplay of unity and diversity within the cosmos, attributing both harmonious and conflicting aspects to divine principles or causes. They explore the idea of divine genera and their interactions, though from different mythological and philosophical frameworks.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XIII
Consider, therefore, also another genus of causes; how a stone or a herb frequently possess from themselves a nature corruptive, or again collective of generated natures. For this is not only the case with these, but this physical power is…”
Both passages discuss the concept of divine genera and their interactions, including the idea of contrariety and the administration of the universe. They explore how different principles and powers interact, often in opposition, and how these interactions are interpreted by mythologists and poets.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 184
Section 8 8. What can this other cause be; one standing above those treated of; one that leaves nothing causeless, that preserves sequence and order in the Universe and yet allows ourselves some reality and leaves room for prediction and au…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the material world and higher principles. They explore the idea of a higher cause or principle that governs the universe and the individual soul's role within it, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
9 more
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 203 (part 2)
That one Reason-Principle, then, must be the unification of conflicting Reason-Principles whose very opposition is the support of its coherence and, almost, of its Being. And indeed, if it were not multiple, it could not be a Universal Pri…”
Both passages discuss the concept of contrariety and the necessity of differentiation within a unified principle. They explore how opposition and diversity are integral to the structure and function of fundamental principles, albeit within different philosophical and theological frameworks.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 205
Section 18 18. Souls vary in worth; and the difference is due, among other causes, to an almost initial inequality; it is in reason that, standing to the Reason-Principle, as parts, they should be unequal by the fact of becoming separate. W…”
Both passages discuss the role of divine principles or souls in the universe, exploring how they interact with each other and with lesser beings or forces. They both delve into the idea of contrariety and the apparent conflicts within the divine order, though from different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 213
Section 7 7. And since the higher exists, there must be the lower as well. The Universe is a thing of variety, and how could there be an inferior without a superior or a superior without an inferior? We cannot complain about the lower in th…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between higher and lower principles in the universe, emphasizing the interconnectedness and hierarchy of existence. They explore the idea of emanation and the interplay between unity and multiplicity, though from different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 448
Section 16 16. We have, of course, already seen that a secondary must follow upon the First, and that this is a power immeasurably fruitful; and we indicated that this truth is confirmed by the entire order of things since there is nothing,…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between a primary principle and secondary principles, emphasizing the unity and simplicity of the primary principle and the multiplicity and derivation of the secondary principles. They also explore the nature of goodness and the intellectual principle, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 579
Section 18 18. These problems at any rate all serve to show that, while in general it is necessary to look for differences by which to separate things from each other, to hunt for differences of the differences themselves is both futile and…”
Both passages explore the nature of differences and contrarieties within their respective metaphysical frameworks. Plotinus discusses the futility of seeking differences of differences, while Proclus examines the contrarieties among divine principles and their manifestations. Both delve into the complexities of distinguishing and categorizing qualities and principles.
renaissance_hermeticism|Agrippa: The Philosophy of Natural Magic, Chapter XI — How Occult Virtues are Infused into the Several Kinds of Things by Ideas Through the Help of the Soul of the World, And Rays of the Stars; and what Things Abound Most with this Virtue|Chapter XI, Section 1
CHAPTER XI. How Occult Virtues are Infused into the Several Kinds of Things by Ideas Through the Help of the Soul of the World, And Rays of the Stars; and what Things Abound Most with this Virtue . Platonists say that all inferior bodies ar…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between divine principles and the material world, emphasizing the role of ideas or causes in shaping the universe. They explore the concept of contrariety and the administration of divine powers, though within different mythological and philosophical frameworks.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|Third Dialogueh
In which generation finding themselves once more through the changes which permutably succeed, they return again to the superior forms. Cic . So that they mean, that souls are impelled by the necessity of fate, and have no proper counsel…”
Both passages discuss the transformation and transmutation of souls or divine principles, highlighting the movement between higher and lower states. They also explore the concept of divine forms and the struggle between unity and multiplicity, though within different mythological frameworks.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part II (Gli Eroici Furori)|Second Dialogueb
Now why should we force ourselves to corrupt the state of nature which has separated the universe into things major and minor, superior and inferior, illustrious and obscure, worthy and unworthy, not only outside ourselves but also inside i…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchical nature of existence and the dangers of disrupting this order. They also explore the theme of wisdom and the proper understanding of divine principles, though from different cultural and philosophical perspectives.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|6. Magical Equilibriume
For this reason nothing is useless or lost. Every utterance and every movement are for or against equilibrium, for or against truth, which is composed of for and against conciliated, or at least equilibrated. We shall state in the introdu…”
Both passages discuss the balance of opposing forces and the necessity of equilibrium in the universe. Passage A focuses on magical equilibrium and the conciliation of opposites, while Passage B describes the divine genera and their interactions, emphasizing the balance and opposition of different principles.