← Home
Meister Eckhart's Sermons (Field translation) · 18 of 23 · tr. Claud Field

VIc

Here some one may make the objection: “Are then all good works and prayers thrown away, since God is unmoved by them, and at the same time we are told to pray to Him for everything?” In answer to this I say that God from all eternity saw everything that would happen, and also when, and how He would make all creatures: He foresaw also all the prayers which would be offered, and which of them He would hear: He saw the earnest prayers which thou wilt offer tomorrow, but He will not listen to them tomorrow, because He heard them in eternity, before thou wast a man at all. If, however, thy prayer is half-hearted and not in earnest, God will not deny it now , seeing that He has denied it in eternity. Thus God remains always in His immovable sanctity, but sincere prayer and good works are not lost, for whoso doeth well, will be well rewarded. When God appears to be angry or to do us a kindness, it is we who are altered, while He remains unchangeable, as the same sunshine is injurious to weak eyes and beneficial to strong ones, remaining in itself the same. Regarding this Isidorus in his book concerning the highest good says, “People ask what was God doing before He created heaven and earth, or whence came the new desire in God to create?” To this he answers, “No new desire arose in God, seeing that creation was everlastingly present in Him, and in His intelligence.” Moses said to God, “When Pharaoh asks me who Thou art, what shall I answer?” God said, “Say, I AM hath sent me unto you,” that is to say, “He Who is unchangeable hath sent me.” Perhaps some one may ask, “Was Christ then also unchangeable, when He said, ‘My soul is troubled even unto death,’ or Mary when she stood under the Cross and lamented?” Here, thou shouldest know that in every man are two kinds of men, the outer and the inner man. Every man, who loves God, only uses his outer senses so far as is absolutely necessary; he takes care that they do not drag him down to the level of the beasts, as they do some who might rather he termed beasts than men. The soul of the spiritual man whom God moves to love Him with all his powers concentrates all its forces on the inner man. Therefore He saith, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart.” Now, there are some who waste the powers of the soul for the use of the outer man; these are they who turn all their thoughts and desires towards transitory things, and know nothing of the inner life. But a good man sometimes deprives his outer man of all power that it may have a higher object, while sensualists deprive the inner man of all power to use it for the outer man. The outer man may go through various experiences, while the inner man is quite free and immovable. Now both in Christ and in Our Lady there was an inner and an outer man; when they spoke of outward things, they did so with the outward man, while the inner man remained immovable. It may be asked: “What is the object of this immovable sanctity?” I answer, “Nothing”: that is, so far as God has His way with a man, for He has not His way with all men. Although God is Almighty, He can only work in a heart when He finds readiness or makes it. He works differently in men than in stones. For this we may take the following illustration: if we bake in one oven three loaves of barley-bread, of rye-bread, and of wheat, we shall find the same heat of the oven affects them differently; when one is well-baked, another will be still raw, and another yet more raw.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

God is described as unchangeable and the object of sanctity is 'Nothing', emphasizing transcendence beyond categories.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The outer senses are described as dragging the soul down to the level of beasts if not controlled.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

God remains in 'immovable sanctity' and is 'unchangeable', indicating a lack of composite parts or alteration.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is depicted as actively working, moving the soul, hearing prayers, and rewarding good works.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

[auto] Eckhart's core theme of the inner man remaining immovable while depriving the outer man of power is a clear expression of detachment.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

[auto] The passage centrally discusses how God foresaw all prayers and events from eternity, actively ordering human affairs.

All passages →
Prayerpraxis

Direct address to the divine, whether petitionary, contemplative, or liturgical; speech and silence offered upward.

[auto] The text opens with an objection regarding the efficacy of prayer and extensively discusses earnest versus half-hearted prayer.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XIa
“ How therefore ,” you ask, “ are many things performed to them in sacred operations, as if they were passive? ” I reply, that this is asserted through an ignorance of sacerdotal mysticism. For of the things which are perpetually effected…”
Both passages discuss the immutability of the divine and the distinction between outer and inner experiences or states. Meister Eckhart emphasizes the unchangeable nature of God and the duality of the inner and outer man, while the Hermetic text discusses the incorporeal and perpetual nature of divine essences and the symbolic actions that do not affect the divine but serve human purposes.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 350
Section 30 30. We have declared acts of memory unnecessary to the stars, but we allow them perceptions, hearing as well as seeing; for we said that prayers to them were heard- our supplications to the sun, and those, even, of certain other…”
Both passages explore the relationship between divine beings and human actions, specifically prayers. They discuss the concept of divine immutability and how divine beings respond to human prayers, albeit from different religious and philosophical perspectives.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 362
Section 42 42. It follows that, for the purposes which have induced this discussion, the stars have no need of memory or of any sense of petitions addressed to them; they give no such voluntary attention to prayers as some have thought: it…”
Both passages discuss the concept of an unmoved, immutable divine principle that is unaffected by human actions or prayers. They also explore the idea that the divine gives spontaneously and that the divine's immutability does not negate the effectiveness of sincere prayers or good works.