← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 5 of 5 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 8, Section 1e

It thus = (1) “equality”; (2) “rightness.” D. maintains that all things possess the latter though not the former. 421 The highest power our minds can conceive is that of the angels. But God has the dominion over them, and hence His power is of a yet higher kind such as we cannot conceive. 422 Since the ultimate Godhead is undifferentiated God’s power is conceived of as an undifferentiated or potential energy. 423 The inexhaustible multiplication of things in this world, though it should go on for ever, is a series made up of separate units. God’s inexhaustible energy is beyond this series because it is one indivisible act. The Undifferentiated transcends infinite divisibility. Cf. IX. 2. 424 This is meant to meet the objection that if God’s power is infinite there should be no decay or death. Things, says D., are sometimes incapable of responding, as a blind eye cannot respond to the light. 425 i. e. Power in the abstract. 426 See Intr., p. 43. 427 The name is introduced to support the fiction of authorship, and an objection, current no doubt in the writer’s day (as in every age), is put into the mouth of one who belonged to the same time as St. Paul’s Athenian convert. 428 2 Tim. ii. 13 . 429 He seems to mean two distinct things: (1) The objection is childish and needs no answering; (2) The whole question is beyond the reach of our understanding. 430 This unskilled athlete is not very convincing. Presumably D. could not box! 431 Vide supra on Exemplars. 432 D. is least satisfactory when he becomes an apologist, and when (like other apologists) he tries to explain away the obvious fact of evil and imperfection. Within certain limits what he says will hold. A rose fulfils its true function by being a rose, and not by trying to be an elephant. But to hold that whatever is, is best, is quietism. The variety of the world is good, but not its imperfections. 433 True again within certain limits. The Saints are made perfect through suffering. But :what of the innocent child victims of war atrocities? 434 Salvation is that which, when persons or things are in a right state, keeps them therein; when they are in a wrong state, transfers them thence. The first meaning is positive and essential, the second negative and incidental. The Scriptural view includes both sides, with the emphasis on the first. Protestantism (being in this as in other matters of a negative tendency) ignores the positive side to the great detriment of Religion. 435 i. e. All good things. 436 Nothingness includes (1) mere non-entity ; (2 ) evil. (Perhaps both meanings are intended.) Salvation maintains all good things both in their being and in their excellence. If they fell away towards nothingness the result is first corruption and then destruction. 437 The word ἰσότης implies that a thing is identical in size, etc. (1) with other things; (2 ) with its own true nature. It thus = (1) “equality”; (2) “rightness.” D. maintains that all things possess the latter though not the former.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The passage explicitly states that God's power is 'conceived of as an undifferentiated or potential energy' and that His power is 'beyond this series because it is one indivisible act.'

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The text notes that God's power is 'of a yet higher kind such as we cannot conceive' and that the ultimate Godhead is 'undifferentiated.'

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The text emphasizes that God's power is 'one indivisible act' and that the Undifferentiated transcends infinite divisibility.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage argues that evil is not a positive being but a lack of response or decay inherent in separate units.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The text describes God's power as an 'undifferentiated or potential energy' that transcends multiplicity.

All passages →
Numerical Mysticismtheology

Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality.

The passage contrasts the 'inexhaustible multiplication of things' with God's 'one indivisible act.'

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text describes God's power as an 'undifferentiated or potential energy' that transcends the series of separate units.

All passages →
Related passages · 15 parallels
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 4: The Epistles|Section 1c
It is Itself Its Source, since It may have no other Source. The Oneness then being Source, containeth every number, but is contained by none; engendereth every number, but is engendered by no other one. 11. Now all that is engendered is…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as a singular, perfect, and ultimate source of all things. They also explore the relationship between the divine and the imperfect, created world, highlighting the superiority and containment of the divine.
jewish_mysticism|The Kabbalah Unveiled|Introduction, Section 1a
p. 43 SPRA DTzNIOVThA (SIPHRA DTZENIOUTHA); OR, THE BOOK OF CONCEALED MYSTERY. CHAPTER I. 1. Tradition .--"The Book of Concealed Mystery" is the book of the equilibrium of balance. [The word "Dtzenioutha" is difficult to translate, but…”
Both passages discuss the concept of equilibrium and the manifestation of the divine. The Kabbalah passage describes the equilibrium of balance in the context of the Deity's manifestation, while the second passage discusses the rightness and equality of all things in relation to God's power and the undifferentiated Godhead.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VII
Of the extremes, therefore, one is supreme, transcendent, and perfect; but the other is last in dignity, deficient, and more imperfect. And the former, indeed, is capable of accomplishing all things at once, uniformly in an instant; but the…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine and lesser beings, emphasizing the supremacy and perfection of the highest power (God or Intellect) and the imperfection and multiplicity of lower beings (soul or created things). They explore the relationship between the divine and the created, highlighting the unity and indivisibility of the divine power versus the multiplicity and divisibility of created beings.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 188
Section 1 1. To make the existence and coherent structure of this Universe depend upon automatic activity and upon chance is against all good sense. Such a notion could be entertained only where there is neither intelligence nor even ordina…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine providence and the perfection of the divine realm. They explore the idea of an eternal, undifferentiated divine intelligence that is the cause of the universe, emphasizing the unity and perfection of the divine nature.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 189
Section 2 2. By derivation from that Authentic Kosmos, one within itself, there subsists this lower kosmos, no longer a true unity. It is multiple, divided into various elements, thing standing apart from thing in a new estrangement. No lon…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to the material world, emphasizing the concept of a higher, unified realm (Intellectual Principle in Plotinus, Godhead in the second passage) and its emanation or interaction with a lower, multiple, and imperfect realm. They also explore the themes of harmony, discord, and the limitations of the material world.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 213
Section 7 7. And since the higher exists, there must be the lower as well. The Universe is a thing of variety, and how could there be an inferior without a superior or a superior without an inferior? We cannot complain about the lower in th…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchical nature of existence and the relationship between the higher and lower realms. They explore the concept of a unified principle from which all things emanate and the interconnectedness of all beings, though they do so within different theological frameworks.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 276 (part 1)
Section 10 10. And what will such a Principle essentially be? The potentiality of the Universe: the potentiality whose non-existence would mean the non-existence of all the Universe and even of the Intellectual-Principle which is the prim…”
Both passages discuss the concept of an ultimate, transcendent principle that is the source of all existence and life. They explore the nature of this principle as being beyond duality and multiplicity, and as the cause of all that exists.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 355 (part 1)
Section 35 35. But we must give some explanation of these powers. The matter requires a more definite handling. How can there be a difference of power between one triangular configuration and another? How can there be the exercise of po…”
Both passages discuss the nature of power and its manifestation within a cosmic or divine order. They explore the idea of unity and harmony in the universe, with Passage A focusing on the living unity of the All and Passage B on the undifferentiated power of God.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 356
Section 36 36. The Universe is immensely varied, the container of all the Reason-Principles and of infinite and diverse efficacies. In man, we are told, the eye has its power, and the bones have their varied powers, and so with each separat…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine power and its relationship to the created world. They explore the idea of divine energy being undifferentiated and transcendent, and the variety of powers within the universe. However, they come from different mystical traditions, Pseudo-Dionysius from Christian mysticism and Plotinus from Neoplatonism.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 357
Section 37 37. We must not rob the universe of any factor in its being. If any of our theorists of to-day seek to explain the action of fire- or of any other such form, thought of as an agent- they will find themselves in difficulties unles…”
Both passages discuss the inherent power and functionality of all things within the universe, emphasizing that each entity has a role and power within the greater whole. Passage A focuses on the soul and natural forces, while Passage B discusses divine power and the rightness of all things, but both share the concept of interconnectedness and the inherent qualities of all entities.
5 more
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 359
Section 39 39. We cannot, then, refer all that exists to Reason-Principles inherent in the seed of things [Spermatic Reasons]; the universe is to be traced further back, to the more primal forces, to the principles by which that seed itself…”
Both passages explore the nature of divine power and its relationship to the created world. Pseudo-Dionysius discusses the undifferentiated power of God and the limitations of human understanding, while Plotinus (Select Works) delves into the primal forces shaping the universe and the role of Reason-Principles. Both texts grapple with the concept of divine order and the limitations of human comprehension.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 451
Section 1 1. Anything existing after The First must necessarily arise from that First, whether immediately or as tracing back to it through intervenients; there must be an order of secondaries and tertiaries, in which any second is to be re…”
Both passages discuss the nature of a supreme, undifferentiated principle (The First in Plotinus, God in the second passage) that is the source of all existence. They explore the concept of unity, simplicity, and the emanation of lesser beings from this ultimate source.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 458
Section 5 5. We return to our statement that The First remains intact even when other entities spring from it. In the case of numbers, the unit remains intact while something else produces, and thus number arises in dependence on the unit:…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, ultimate source from which all things emanate. Passage A describes The One in Plotinus' philosophy, while Passage B discusses the undifferentiated Godhead in a different mystical tradition. Both emphasize the unity and primacy of this source.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 679 (part 2)
But this would make the power something outside itself; there would be, I mean, the power it grasped and the power by which it grasped: if there is but the one power, what is there to grasp at?…”
Both passages explore the nature of divine power and its relationship to creation. Passage A discusses the unity of power within the divine, while Passage B elaborates on the undifferentiated nature of God's power and its transcendence over creation.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 681
Section 42 42. Faced by the difficulty of placing these powers, you must in reason allocate to the secondaries what you count august: secondaries must not be foisted upon the First, or tertiaries upon the secondaries. Secondaries are to be…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchical structure of reality and the relationship between different levels of existence. Passage A from Plotinus describes the emanation of beings from the First, while Passage B from Dionysius discusses the undifferentiated power of God and the hierarchy of creation.