← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 6 of 6 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 7, Section 1f

The angels are conceived of as being always in such a state of contemplation. 408 God is the Manifested Absolute. Hence qua Absolute He is supra-sapient, qua Manifested He is wise (cf. ch. i, § 1). The Persons of the Trinity possess one common Godhead (= the Absolute) which is supra-sapient, and in that Godhead. They are One. Yet they are known by us only in their differentiation wherein Supra-Sapience is revealed as Wisdom. 409 Via Negativa. It is not mere negation. 410 Susannah 42. 411 “According to its idea,” “according to the law of its species.” We perceive that this is a rose and that is a horse because we have two separate notions in our minds—one the notion of a rose and the other that of a horse. But in the Divine Knowledge there is only one Notion wherein such specific notions are elements, as the activities of several nerves are elements in one indivisible sensation of taste, or touch, or smell. 412 i. e. Suppose the light were conscious, and knew its own nature, it would know that if it withheld its brightness there would be darkness (for the very nature of light is that it dispels, or at least prevents, darkness). On the other hand, the light could not directly know the darkness, because darkness cannot exist where there is light. The simile is capable of being applied to illustrate God’s knowledge of the world, because the world is imperfect. It applies more fundamentally to God’s knowledge of evil, and is so employed by St. Thomas Aquinas, who quotes this passage and says (Summa, xiv. 10) that, since evil is the lack of good, God knows evil things in the act by which He knows good things, as we know darkness through knowing light. 413 God, being the Manifested Absolute, exists on two planes at once: that of Undifferentiation and that of Differentiation. On this second plane He moves out into creative activity. And thus He is both knowable and unknowable: knowable in so far as He passes outwards into such activity, unknowable in that His Being passes inwards into Undifferentiation. Thus He is known in His acts but not in His ultimate Nature. 414 He is the Super-Essence of all things, wherein all things possess their true being outside of themselves [as our perceptions are outside of ourselves in the things we perceive. (Vide Bergson, Matière et Mémoire.)]. 415 This is experience and not mere theory. 416 Prov. viii. 417 The reference is, of course, to the opening verses of St. John’s Gospel. The present passage shows that by the term “God” D. means not one Differentiation of the Godhead singly (i. e. not God the Father), but all Three Differentiations together; the undivided (though differentiated) Trinity. 418 Wisdom viii. i 419 God is called Reason: (1) because He is the Giver of reason; (2j because reason causes unity (e.g. it unifies our thoughts, making them coherent), and God in His creative activity causes unity and in His ultimate Godhead is Unity. 420 The Divine Omniscience is: (1) the Object of our faith because we trust in it; (2) the Ground of our faith because the development of our faith comes from it. Faith is a faint image of Divine Knowledge, and is gradually perfected by being changed into knowledge.
Themes
Active Contemplationpraxis

A form of meditation that uses imagery, imagination, or symbolic thought rather than purely empty stillness.

The passage explicitly states that angels are conceived of as being always in such a state of contemplation.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text references 'Via Negativa' and describes God's unknowability in His ultimate Nature.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

God is described as unknowable in His ultimate Nature despite being knowable in His acts.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

The text uses the simile of light and darkness to illustrate God's knowledge of the world and evil.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage explicitly defines evil as 'the lack of good' and explains how God knows it through knowing good.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

God is described as the 'Undifferentiated' Absolute and One Godhead.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage presents the paradox that God is both knowable and unknowable simultaneously.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text states that the Persons of the Trinity possess one common Godhead and are One.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn LXXVI. MNEMOSYNE, or the GODDESS of MEMORY
LXXVI. To MNEMOSYNE, or the GODDESS of MEMORY * . The FUMIGATION from FRANKINCENSE. THE consort I invoke of Jove divine, Source of the holy, sweetly-speaking Nine; p. 215 Free from th' oblivion of the fallen mind, By whom the soul with inte…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the divine and human understanding, emphasizing the role of intellect and memory in connecting with the divine. They share a mystical perspective on the nature of divine knowledge and its manifestation in the world.
jewish_mysticism|Sefer Yetzirah (The Book of Formation)|Section 1g
The Eighteenth Path is called the House of Influence (by the greatness of whose abundance the influx of good things upon created beings is increased) and from the midst of the investigation the arcana and hidden senses are drawn forth, whic…”
Both passages explore the nature of divine knowledge and its relationship to creation. Pseudo-Dionysius discusses the divine as both knowable and unknowable, while the Sepher Yetzirah describes the paths of divine influence and intelligence. Both texts delve into the mystical aspects of divine attributes and their manifestation in the created world.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 680
Section 41 41. Intellection seems to have been given as an aid to the diviner but weaker beings, an eye to the blind. But the eye itself need not see Being since it is itself the light; what must take the light through the eye needs the lig…”
Both passages explore the nature of divine knowledge and the limitations of human understanding in comprehending the divine. They discuss the concept of the divine as both knowable and unknowable, and the relationship between the divine and human intellect.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 8)
Permanency also suffers no change of its nature, because it is not mingled with the unstable. And the beautiful there is beautiful, because it does not subsist in beauty (as in a subject). Each thing too is there p. 280 established, not…”
Both passages explore the nature of divine knowledge and the relationship between the divine and the created world. They discuss the unity and differentiation within the divine, the nature of divine contemplation, and the limitations of human understanding in comprehending the divine.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|3. The Triangle Of Solomonb
The primeval sages, when seeking the First of Causes, behold good and evil in the world. They considered shadow and light; they compared winter with spring, age with youth, life with death, and their conclusion was this: The First Cause is…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation and differentiation. Passage A discusses the Trinity and the concept of the Manifested Absolute, while Passage B delves into the triadic nature of God and the balance of good and evil. Both texts emphasize the unity and differentiation within the divine, albeit in different theological frameworks.