← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 164 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter XXI (part 2)

Science cannot deny the fact that mathematics grows, expands, and escapes from the limits of the visible and measurable world. Entire departments of mathematics take into consideration quantitative relations which did not and do not exist in the real world of p. 256 positivism, i.e., relations which have no correspondence to any realities in the visible, three-dimensional world. But there cannot be any mathematical relations to which the relation of some realities would not correspond. Therefore mathematics transcends the limits of our world, and penetrates into a world unknown. This is the telescope , by the aid of which we begin to investigate the space of many dimensions with its worlds. Mathematics goes ahead of our thought, ahead of our power of imagination and perception. Even now it is engaged in calculating relations which we cannot imagine or comprehend. It is impossible to deny all this, even from the strictly "positivistic," i.e., positive standpoint. Thus science, having admitted the possibility of the expansion of mathematics beyond the limits of the sensuously perceived world—that is beyond the limits of a world accessible (though theoretically) to the organs of sense and their mechanical aids—must thereby recognize the expansion of the real world far beyond the limits of any "infinite sphere" or of our logic, i.e., must recognize the reality of "the world of many dimensions." The recognition of the reality of the world of many dimensions is the already accomplished transition to, and understanding of, the world of the wondrous. And this transition to the wondrous is impossible without the recognition of the reality of new logical relations which are absurd and impossible from the standpoint of our logic. What are the laws of our logic? They are the laws of our receptivity of the three-dimensional world , or the laws of our three-dimensional receptivity of the world . If we desire to escape from the three-dimensional world and go farther, we must first of all work out the fundamental logical principles which would permit us to observe the relations of things in a world of many dimensions—seeing in them a certain reasonableness, and not complete absurdity. If we enter there armed only with the principles of the logic of the three-dimensional world, these principles will drag us back, will not give us a chance to rise from the earth. First of all we must throw off the chains of our logic. This is the first, the great, the chief liberation toward which humanity p. 257 must strive. Man, throwing off the chains of "three-dimensional" logic, has already penetrated, in thought, into another world. And not only is this transition possible, but it is accomplished constantly. Although unhappily we are not entirely conscious of our rights in "another world," and often sacrifice these rights, regarding ourselves as limited to this earthly world, paths nevertheless exist. Poetry, mysticism, the idealistic philosophy of all ages and peoples, preserve the traces of such transitions. Following these traces, we ourselves can find the path. Ancient and modern thinkers have given us many keys with which we may open mysterious doors; many magical formulæ, before which these doors open of themselves. But we have not understood either the purpose of these keys or the meaning of the formulæ. We have also lost the understanding of magical ceremonies and rites of initiation into mysteries which had a single purpose: to help this transformation in the soul of man. Therefore the doors remained closed, and we even denied that there was anything whatever behind them; or, suspecting the existence of another world, we regarded it as similar to ours, and separate from ours, and tried to penetrate there unconscious of the fact that the chief obstacle in our path was our own division of the world into this world and that . The world is one , only the ways of knowing it are different; and with imperfect methods of knowledge it is impossible to penetrate into that which is accessible to perfect methods only.
Themes
Alchemical Workpraxis

The transformation of base substance — outer matter or the inner soul — into a purified, perfected, or 'gold' state; the magnum opus as both laboratory practice and spiritual allegory.

The text mentions rites of initiation designed to help 'this transformation in the soul of man,' echoing alchemical spiritual transformation.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text implies the limits of human comprehension regarding higher realities, noting relations we 'cannot imagine or comprehend.'

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The three-dimensional world and its associated logic are described as chains that drag humanity back and prevent access to higher dimensions.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

The instruction to 'throw off the chains of our logic' parallels the practice of letting go of mental constructs to access higher states.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

References to a 'world unknown' and 'mysterious doors' suggest a reality concealed from ordinary perception.

All passages →
Infinite Cosmoscosmology

The doctrine of the universe as boundless and without center or circumference, populated by innumerable worlds — Bruno's rejection of the closed Aristotelian sphere; the divine and the cosmos as ontologically infinite.

The text explicitly discusses the expansion of the real world beyond any 'infinite sphere' into a space of many dimensions and worlds.

All passages →
Mechanical Humanityanthropology

Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.

The passage reflects Ouspensky's core theme that humans are unconscious of their rights in another world and regard themselves as limited to the earthly realm.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

The author identifies the division of the world into 'this world and that' as the chief obstacle to be overcome in realizing the unity of existence.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text states that understanding higher worlds requires recognizing logical relations that are 'absurd and impossible from the standpoint of our logic.'

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The text describes a 'transition to the wondrous' and the necessity to 'rise from the earth' through new logical principles.

All passages →
Theurgypraxis

Iamblichean ritual practice that engages the gods directly through consecrated material symbols and actions, on the premise that divine power descends into properly prepared matter — distinct from philosophical contemplation alone.

The passage acknowledges 'magical ceremonies and rites of initiation' as historical tools for spiritual transformation, though their meaning is lost.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] Recognition of the reality of many dimensions is described as the transition itself, emphasizing knowledge over faith or ritual.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

[auto] It references misunderstood 'magical formulæ' and 'keys' from ancient mysteries that preserve traces of transitions to higher worlds.

All passages →
Numerical Mysticismtheology

Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality.

[auto] The passage explicitly identifies mathematics as the primary tool that transcends visible limits and reveals the structure of higher dimensional realities.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The text concludes with the definitive statement that 'The world is one,' asserting non-duality despite different methods of knowing.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter IV
If, however, it be necessary, dismissing these particulars, to speak what appears to me to be the truth, you do not rightly infer “ that a knowledge of this mathematical science [143] cannot be obtained, because there is much dissonance con…”
Both passages discuss the limitations of human perception and logic in understanding higher realities. Passage A focuses on the expansion of mathematics beyond the three-dimensional world, while Passage B discusses the divine mode of knowledge and the truth of mathematical science, both suggesting that there are higher truths beyond ordinary understanding.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 603
Section 13 13. But how account, at this, for its extension over all the heavens and all living beings? There is no such extension. Sense-perception, by insistence upon which we doubt, tells of Here and There; but reason certifies that the H…”
Both passages explore the idea of transcending the limitations of the physical, three-dimensional world to access a higher or more fundamental reality. They both suggest that our current logical and perceptual frameworks are inadequate for understanding this higher reality, and that new principles or methods are needed.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 613
Section 6 6. The Intellectual Beings, thus, are multiple and one; in virtue of their infinite nature their unity is a multiplicity, many in one and one over many, a unit-plurality. They act as entire upon entire; even upon the partial thing…”
Both passages explore the idea of transcending the limitations of the physical, three-dimensional world to access a higher or more fundamental reality. Passage A discusses the expansion of mathematics beyond the visible world, suggesting a 'world of many dimensions,' while Passage B discusses the participation of the extended world in an undivided, unextended principle, suggesting an omnipresent indivisible soul.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 623
Section 3 3. And there is the question How can the infinite have existence and remain unlimited: whatever is in actual existence is by that very fact determined numerically. But, first, if multiplicity holds a true place among Beings, how c…”
Both passages explore the idea of transcending the limitations of the known world. Passage A discusses the expansion of mathematics beyond the three-dimensional world, while Passage B delves into the nature of the infinite and the unlimited, both suggesting a reality beyond conventional understanding.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 633 (part 1)
Section 13 13. It cannot reasonably be thought that the notion of unity is derived from the object since this is physical- man, animal, even stone, a presentation of that order is something very different from unity [which must be a thing…”
Both passages explore the limitations of human perception and logic in understanding a reality that transcends the three-dimensional world. They both suggest that to comprehend higher dimensions or the infinite, one must move beyond conventional logic and methods of knowledge.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 637
Section 17 17. But what of the Infinite Number we hear of; does not all this reasoning set it under limit? And rightly so if the thing is to be a number; limitlessness and number are in contradiction. How, then, do we come to use the term?…”
Both passages explore the idea of transcending the limitations of the physical world and logic to access a higher or more complex reality. Passage A discusses the expansion of mathematics beyond the three-dimensional world, while Passage B discusses the concept of an infinite line in the Intellectual realm, both suggesting the existence of realities beyond our immediate perception.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1i
Yes, I said, but for that purpose a very little of either geometry or calculation will be enough; the question relates rather to the greater and more advanced part of geometry--whether that tends in any degree to make more easy the vision o…”
Both passages discuss the idea that mathematical or geometric study can lead to a deeper understanding of reality beyond the physical world. They emphasize the importance of transcending conventional logic or perception to grasp higher truths.