← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 97 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter XIII (part 4)

Materialism and energetics are those "obvious" theories which cannot be true without proofs , because they cannot not have proofs if they contain even a little grain of truth. But there are no proofs at the disposition of these theories; quite the reverse: the infinitely greater potentiality of the phenomena of life and the psyche compared with physical phenomena assures us of the exact opposite. The simple fact, above shown, of the enormous liberating, unbinding force of psychic phenomena is sufficient to establish quite really and firmly the problem of the world of the hidden . And the world of the hidden cannot be the world of unconscious mechanical motion, of unconscious development of electro-magnetic forces. The positivistic theory admits the possibility of explaining the higher through the lower , the invisible through the visible . But it has been shown at the very beginning that this is the explanation of one unknown by another unknown. There is still less justification for explaining the known through the unknown . Yet that "lower" (matter and motion) through which the positivists strive to explain the "higher" (life and thought) is itself unknown . Consequently it is impossible to explain and define anything else in terms of it, while the higher , i.e., the thought , this is our sole known : it is this alone that we do know, that we are conscious of in ourselves, that we can neither mistake nor doubt. And if thought can evoke or unbind physical energy, and motion can never create or unbind thought (out of a revolving wheel no thought ever arose) so of course we shall strive to define, not the higher in terms of the lower, but the lower in terms of the higher. If the invisible, like the contents of a book or the purpose of a watch , defines by itself the visible, so also we shall endeavor to understand not the visible, but the invisible. Starting from a false assumption concerning the mechanicality of the noumenal side of nature, positive science, upon which the view of the world of the intelligent majority of contemporary humanity is founded, makes still another mistake in regard to cause and effect, or the law of functions—that is, it mistakes what is cause, and what is effect. ______ p. 149 Just as the two-dimensional plane-man thinks of all phenomena touching his consciousness as lying on one plane, so the positivistic method strives to interpret upon one plane all phenomena of different orders, i.e., to interpret all visible phenomena as the effects of antecedent visible phenomena, and as the inevitable cause of subsequent visible phenomena. In other words, it sees in causal and functional interdependence merely phenomena proceeding upon the surface, and studies the visible world, or the phenomena of the visible world, not admitting that causes can enter into this world which are not contained in it or that the phenomena of this world can possess functions extending beyond it. But this could be true only in case there were no phenomena of life and of thought in the world, or if the phenomena of life and thought were really derivatives from physical phenomena, and did not possess infinitely greater latent force than they. Then only should we have the right to consider the chains of phenomena in their physical or visible sequence alone, as positivistic philosophy does. But taking into consideration the phenomena of life and thought we shall inevitably recognize that the chain of phenomena often translates itself from a sequence purely physical to a biological sequence, i.e., one in which there is much of the hidden and in-visible to us—or to a psychical sequence where there is even more of the hidden; but during reverse translations from biological and psychical spheres into physical sequences actions proceed often, if not always, from regions which are hidden from us; i.e., the cause of the visible is the invisible. In consequence of this we must admit that it is impossible to consider the chains of sequences in the world of physical phenomena only.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

Matter and motion are characterized as 'unknown' and inferior compared to the known reality of thought.

All passages →
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The text suggests that the invisible defines the visible, implying a structural or causal relationship between different levels of reality.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The passage describes a hierarchy of phenomena (physical, biological, psychical) where the higher defines the lower, though not strictly as divine emanations.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

Thought is described as the internal known reality that possesses greater force than external physical phenomena.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

The text locates the only true knowledge ('thought') within the self rather than in external observation.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

Thought is presented as the defining principle that explains the visible world, functioning similarly to a rational ordering force.

All passages →
Mechanical Humanityanthropology

Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.

The passage critiques the 'mechanicality of the noumenal side of nature' and the view of the world founded on positive science held by the 'intelligent majority of contemporary humanity,' aligning with the Fourth Way critique of ordinary mechanical consciousness.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The text advocates moving from physical explanations to higher psychical understanding as a corrective to positivism.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

[auto] The text establishes a fundamental opposition between the visible/physical world and the invisible/psychical world.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

[auto] The 'world of the hidden' and the invisible are central themes, posited as the true cause behind visible phenomena.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] The text emphasizes that thought/consciousness is the 'sole known' and primary truth, accessible directly within oneself rather than through external material proofs.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The passage uses the reversal of standard causality (thought creating energy) to challenge materialist assumptions.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

[auto] The passage asserts that thought is what we are 'conscious of in ourselves' and constitutes our only certainty.

All passages →
Tripartite Soulanthropology

Division of the human being into three principles: spirit (pneuma), soul (psyche), and body/matter (hyle or soma).

[auto] The passage explicitly distinguishes between physical, biological, and psychical sequences of phenomena.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 1)
p. 89 CHAPTER IV. CREATION. Everything we see in nature is manifested truth; only we are not able to recognise it as such, unless the truth is manifest within ourselves. God is the supreme, fundamental, universal, self-existent eternal…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the visible and invisible realms, and the limitations of materialistic explanations. They both argue for the primacy of the higher (spiritual or psychic) over the lower (physical), though from different philosophical and religious perspectives.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 8 (part 8)
For the internal being is continually labouring to manifest itself outwardly. Thus everything has its own mouth for the purpose of revealing itself, and therein is based the language of nature, by means of which each thing speaks out of it…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the visible and invisible aspects of reality, emphasizing that the invisible (spiritual or psychic) has a greater potential and influence over the visible (physical). They both argue against materialistic explanations and highlight the limitations of positivistic science.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 279
Section 2 2.... For in any one science the reduction of the total of knowledge into its separate propositions does not shatter its unity, chipping it into unrelated fragments; in each distinct item is talent the entire body of the science,…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the visible and invisible realms, emphasizing the limitations of materialistic explanations and the primacy of higher, non-physical principles. They both argue for the existence of a hidden, more fundamental reality that underlies the physical world.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 352
Section 32 32. If we can trace neither to material agencies [blind elements] nor to any deliberate intention the influences from without which reach to us and to the other forms of life and to the terrestrial in general, what cause satisfac…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the visible and invisible aspects of reality, emphasizing the limitations of materialistic explanations and the need to understand higher principles to explain lower phenomena. They both argue for a more comprehensive understanding of reality that includes non-physical elements.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 355 (part 1)
Section 35 35. But we must give some explanation of these powers. The matter requires a more definite handling. How can there be a difference of power between one triangular configuration and another? How can there be the exercise of po…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the visible and invisible aspects of reality, and the limitations of materialistic explanations. They both argue for a higher, more complex reality that cannot be reduced to physical phenomena alone.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part II (Gli Eroici Furori)|Second Dialoguee
Now, it must be said that the outcome of the mind is that alone which is always by it desired, sought for, and embraced, and that which is more enjoyed than anything else, with which it is filled, comforted and becomes better,—that is Truth…”
Both passages emphasize the primacy of the invisible or incorporeal over the visible or corporeal in understanding reality. They argue that higher phenomena (thought, truth) cannot be reduced to lower ones (physical, material) and that the invisible is the cause of the visible.