Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 59 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon
Chapter VIII (part 5)
Reflex actions are simply responses by motion , reactions upon external irritations, taking place always in the same way, regardless p.
87 of their utility or futility, expediency or inexpediency in any given case.
Their origin and laws are due to the simple irritability of a cell.
What is the irritability of a cell, and what are these laws?
The irritability of a cell is defined as its faculty to respond to external irritation by a motion.
Experiments with the simplest mono-cellular organisms, have shown that this irritability acts according to definite laws.
The cell responds by a motion to outside irritation.
The force of the responsive motion increases as the force of the irritation is intensified, but in no definite proportionality.
In order to provoke the responsive movement the irritation must be of a sufficient intensity.
Each experienced irritation leaves a certain trace in the cell, making it more receptive to the new irritations.
In this we see that the cell responds to the repetitive irritation of an equal force by a more forceful motion than the first one.
And if the irritations be repeated further the cell will respond to them by more and more forceful motions, up to a certain limit.
Having reached this limit the cell experiences fatigue , and responds to the same irritation by more and more feeble reactions.
It is as if the cell becomes accustomed to the irritation.
It becomes for the cell part of a constant environment , and it ceases to react, because it is reacting generally only to changes in conditions which are constant.
If from the very beginning the irritation is so weak that it fails to provoke the responsive motion, it nevertheless leaves in the cell a certain invisible trace.
This can be inferred from the fact that by repeating these weak irritations, the cell finally begins to react to them.
Thus in the laws of irritability we observe, as it were, the beginnings of memory, fatigue, and habit.
The cell produces the illusion, if not of a conscious and reasoning being, at any rate of a remembering being, habit-forming, and susceptible to fatigue.
If we can be thus deceived by a cell, how much more liable are we to be deceived by the greater complexity of animal life.
But let us return to the analysis of actions .
By the reflex actions of an organism are meant actions in which either an entire organism or its separate parts acts as a cell , i.e., within the limits of the law of variability.
We observe such actions both in men and in animals.
A man shudders all over from unexpected cold, or p.
88 from a touch.
His eyelids wink at the swift approach or touch of some object.
The freely-hanging foot of a person in a sitting position moves forward if the leg be struck on the tendon below the knee.
These movements proceed independently of consciousness, they may even proceed counter to consciousness.
Usually consciousness registers them as accomplished facts.
Moreover these movements are not at all governed by expediency.
The foot moves forward in answer to the blow on the tendon even though a knife or a fire be in front of it.
By instinctive actions are meant actions governed by expediency, but made without conscious selection or without conscious aim .
They appear with the appearance of a sensuous tincture to sensations, i.e., from that moment when the sensation begins to be associated with a sense of pleasure or pain.
As a matter of fact, before the dawn of human intellect, throughout the entire animal kingdom "actions" were governed by the tendency to receive or to retain pleasure, or to escape pain.
Themes
◇Mechanical Humanityanthropology
Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.
[auto] The passage explicitly describes reflex and instinctive actions as mechanical responses independent of consciousness, illustrating the core Ouspensky/Gurdjieff concept of human beings acting mechanically.
All passages →Related passages · 3 parallels
◆neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 348 (part 2)
“Thus anger has two phases; there is firstly that which, rising apart from all process of reasoning, draws reason to itself by the medium of the imaging faculty, and secondly that which, rising in reason, touches finally upon the specific pr…”
Both passages explore the concept of automatic, unconscious reactions in living organisms, with Passage A focusing on cellular irritability and reflex actions, and Passage B discussing the vegetal principle underlying anger and emotional responses. Both highlight the idea of automatic responses to stimuli, though in different contexts.
◆neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 350
“Section 30 30. We have declared acts of memory unnecessary to the stars, but we allow them perceptions, hearing as well as seeing; for we said that prayers to them were heard- our supplications to the sun, and those, even, of certain other…”
Both passages explore the concept of automatic, unconscious reactions in living organisms, with Passage A focusing on cellular irritability and reflex actions, and Passage B discussing the vegetal principle underlying anger and other emotional responses. Both highlight the idea of automatic responses to stimuli, though in different contexts.
◆neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 536
“Section 29 29. Qualities must be for this school distinct from Substrates. This in fact they acknowledge by counting them as the second category. If then they form a distinct category, they must be simplex; that is to say they are not compo…”
Both passages explore the nature of responses to external stimuli, discussing the concepts of motion, reaction, and the underlying principles governing these processes. They both delve into the mechanisms of action and reaction, though from different perspectives and within different frameworks.