← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 43 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter VI (part 2)

These will be considered as temporal phenomena, beginning at that moment when they become visible, and ending— ceasing to exist —at that moment when they become invisible. The one-dimensional being will not be in a position to imagine that the phenomenon goes on existing somewhere, though invisibly to him; or he will imagine it as existing somewhere on his line, far ahead of him. We can imagine this one-dimensional being more vividly. Let us take an atom hovering in space, or simply a particle of dust, carried along by the air, and let us imagine that this atom or particle p. 61 of dust possesses a consciousness, i.e., separates himself from the outside world, and is conscious only of that which lies in the line of his motion, and with which he himself comes in contact. He will then be a one-dimensional being in the full sense of the word. He can fly and move in all directions, but it will always seem to him that he is moving upon a single line; outside of this line will be for him only a great Nothingness —the whole universe will appear to him as one line. He will feel none of the turns and angles of his line, for to feel an angle it is necessary to be conscious of that which lies to right or left, above or below. In all other respects such a being will be absolutely identical with the before-described imaginary being living upon the imaginary line. Everything that he comes in contact with, that is, everything that he is conscious of, will seem to him to be emerging from time, i.e., from nothing, vanishing into time, i.e., into nothing. This nothing will be all our world. All our world except one line will be called time and will be counted as actually non-existent. ______ Let us next consider the two-dimensional world, and the being living on a plane. The universe of this being will be one great plane. Let us imagine beings on this plane having the shape of points, lines, and flat geometrical figures. The objects and "solids" of that world will have the shape of flat geometrical figures too. In what manner will a being living on such a plane universe cognize his world? First of all we can affirm that he will not feel the plane upon which he lives. He will not do so because he will feel the objects, i.e., figures which are on this plane. He will feel the lines which limit them, and for this reason he will not feel his plane, for in that case he would not be in a position to discern the lines. The lines will differ from the plane in that they produce sensations; therefore they exist. The plane does not produce sensations; therefore it does not exist. Moving on the plane, the two-dimensional being, feeling no sensations, will declare that nothing now exists. After having encountered some figure, having sensed its lines, he will say that something appeared. But gradually, by a process of reasoning, the two-dimensional being will come to the conclusion that the figures p. 62 he encounters exist on something , or in something . Thereupon he may name such a plane (he will not know, indeed, that it is a plane) the "ether." Accordingly he will declare that the "ether" fills all space, but differs in its qualities from "matter." By "matter" he will mean lines. Having come to this conclusion the two-dimensional being will regard all processes as happening in his "ether," i.e., in his space. He will not be in a position to imagine anything outside of this ether, that is, out of his plane. If anything, proceeding out of his plane, comes in contact with his consciousness, then he will either deny it, or regard it as something subjective, the creation of his own imagination; or else he will believe that it is proceeding right on the plane, in the ether , as are all other phenomena.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

Existence is defined negatively by the lack of sensation ('The plane does not produce sensations; therefore it does not exist'), mirroring negative theological definition.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The one-dimensional being's consciousness is restricted to the line of his motion, acting as a perceptual prison that prevents awareness of the wider universe.

All passages →
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The text employs a structural analogy between lower and higher dimensions to explain how beings in one realm perceive the realities of another, reflecting the 'as above, so below' principle.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

Higher dimensions are described as fundamentally hidden or unimaginable to beings confined to lower dimensional consciousness.

All passages →
Mechanical Humanityanthropology

Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.

The passage illustrates Ouspensky's core concept of limited consciousness by describing beings whose perception is mechanically restricted to their immediate dimensional line or plane.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage uses the paradoxical redefinition of time as 'nothingness' or invisible space to destabilize ordinary understanding and teach about higher dimensions.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 2 (part 1)
p. 58 CHAPTER II. THE UNITY OF THE ALL. "We are all one body in Christ, and have all the Spirit of Christ within our reach. If, then, we enter into the Christ, we may see and know everything by the power of His Spirit." ( Forty Question…”
Both passages explore the limitations of perception and understanding based on dimensional constraints. Passage A uses one-dimensional and two-dimensional beings to illustrate how limited perception shapes reality, while Passage B discusses the human inability to fully comprehend the infinite and eternal nature of God due to finite and temporal constraints.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 265 (part 2)
And this is how Time is omnipresent: that Soul is absent from no fragment of the Kosmos just as our Soul is absent from no particle of ourselves. As for those who pronounce Time a thing of no substantial existence, of no reality, they clea…”
Both passages explore the nature of perception and reality through the lens of dimensional beings. Ouspensky uses one-dimensional and two-dimensional beings to illustrate how limited perception shapes understanding of existence and time, while Plotinus discusses the omnipresence of time and the movement of the soul, relating it to the broader cosmos. Both delve into the limitations of perception and the nature of reality as understood by different types of beings or souls.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 267
Section 1 1. Supposing we played a little before entering upon our serious concern and maintained that all things are striving after Contemplation, looking to Vision as their one end- and this, not merely beings endowed with reason but even…”
Both passages explore the nature of perception and existence within different dimensional frameworks. Passage A discusses the limitations of one-dimensional and two-dimensional beings in perceiving their world, while Passage B examines the omnipresence of time and the movement of the soul, relating it to the perception of time within the self and the cosmos. Both texts delve into the concept of existence and perception within different contexts, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 592
Section 2 2. Side by side exist the Authentic All and its counterpart, the visible universe. The Authentic is contained in nothing, since nothing existed before it; of necessity anything coming after it must, as a first condition of existen…”
Both passages explore the limitations of perception and understanding based on dimensional constraints. Passage A discusses how beings in lower dimensions perceive reality, while Passage B describes the relationship between the Authentic All and the visible universe, highlighting the limitations of human perception and understanding.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1w
in space ], grasping existence in some way or other, or it could not be at all. But true and exact reason, vindicating the nature of true being, maintains that while two things [i.e. the image and space] are different they cannot exist on…”
Both passages explore the concept of dimensionality and the limitations of perception within different dimensions. They discuss how beings in lower dimensions perceive their reality and the challenges they face in comprehending higher dimensions, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.