Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 30 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon
Chapter IV (part 2)
The future also does not exist—it does not exist as yet.
It has not arrived, has not formed.
By the present we mean the moment of transition of the future into the past, i.e., the moment of transition of a phenomenon from one non-existence into another non-existence .
For that moment only does the phenomenon exist for us in reality; before, it existed in potentiality, afterward it will exist in remembrance.
But this short moment is after all only a fiction: it has no measurement.
We have a full right to say that p.
40 the present does not exist.
We can never catch it.
That which we did catch is always the past !
If we are to stop at that we must admit that the world does not exist, or exists only in some phantasmagoria of illusions, flashing and disappearing.
Usually we take no account of this, and do not reflect that our customary view of time leads to utter absurdity.
Let us imagine a stupid traveller going from one city to another and half way between these two cities.
A stupid traveller thinks that the city from which he has departed last week does not exist now : only the memory of it is left; the walls are ruined, the towers fallen, the inhabitants have either died or gone away.
Also, that city at which he is destined to arrive in several days does not exist now either, but is being hurriedly built for his arrival, and on the day of that arrival will be ready, populated, and set in order, and on the day after his departure will be destroyed just as was the first one.
We are thinking of things in time exactly in this way—everything passes away, nothing returns!
The spring has passed, it does not exist still .
The autumn has not come, it does not exist as yet .
But what does exist?
The present.
But the present is not a seizable moment, it is continuously transitory into the past.
So, strictly speaking, neither the past, nor the present, nor the future exists for us.
Nothing exists!
And yet we are living, feeling, thinking—and something surrounds us.
Consequently, in our usual attitude toward time there exists some mistake.
This error we shall endeavor to detect.
We accepted at the very beginning that something exists.
We called that something the world.
How then can the world exist if it is not existing in the past, in the present and in the future?
That conception of the world which we deduced from our usual view of time makes the world appear like a continuously gushing out igneous fountain of fireworks, each spark of which flashes for a moment and disappears, never to appear any more.
Flashes are going on continuously, following one after another, there are an p.
41 infinite number of sparks, and everything together produces the impression of a flame, though it does not exist in reality .
The autumn has not yet come.
It will be, but it does not exist now .
And we give no thought to how that can appear which is not .
We are moving upon a plane, and recognize as really existing only the small circle lighted by our consciousness.
Everything out of this circle, which we do not see, we negate; we do not like to admit that it exists.
We are moving upon the plane in one direction.
This direction we consider as eternal and infinite.
But the direction at right angles to it, those lines which we are intersecting, we do not like to recognize as eternal and infinite.
We imagine them as going into non-existence at once, as soon as we, have passed them, and that the lines before us have not as yet risen out of non-existence.
Themes
◆Apophatic Theologytheology
Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.
The passage negates the existence of past, present, and future to reveal the error in customary conceptions of reality.
The doctrine of the universe as boundless and without center or circumference, populated by innumerable worlds — Bruno's rejection of the closed Aristotelian sphere; the divine and the cosmos as ontologically infinite.
The text contrasts our linear movement with perpendicular lines that are recognized as eternal and infinite, suggesting a boundless reality beyond ordinary perception.
Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.
[auto] The passage critiques ordinary human consciousness as limited and erroneous, describing our perception as a small circle on a plane that negates what lies outside.