The Book of Ceremonial Magic (A.E. Waite) · 22 of 175 · tr. Arthur Edward Waite
Page 7 (part 2)
Thus, the most which can be stated is that the literature falls chiefly into two classes, one of which usually terms itself Black, but that they overlap one another.
In what perhaps it may be permissible to call the mind of Magic, as distinct from the effects which are proposed by the Rituals, there has been always a tolerable contrast between the two branches corresponding to Magus and Sorcerer, and the fact that the ceremonial literature tends to the confusion of the distinction may perhaps only stamp it as garbled.
But this is not to say that it has been tampered with in the sense of having been perverted by editors.
White Magic has not usually been written down into Black; Goëtic Rituals have not been written up in pseudo-celestial terms.
They are, for the most part, naturally composite, and it would be impossible to separate their elements without modifying their structure.
Modern occultism has taken up the clear distinction and developed it Appealing to the secret traditional knowledge behind the written word of Magic--to that unmanifested science which it believes to exist behind all science--and to the religion behind all religion, as if the two were related or identical, it affirms that the advanced occult life has been entered by two classes of adepts, who have been sometimes fantastically distinguished as the Brothers of the Right and the Brothers of the Left, transcendental good and transcendental evil being specified as their respective ends, and in each case they are something altogether different from what is understood conventionally by either White or Black Magic.
As might be expected, the literature of the subject does not bear out this development, but, by the terms of the proposition, this is scarcely to be regarded as an objection.
For the rest, if many rumours and a few questionable revelations must lead us to concede, within certain limits, that there may have been some recrudescence of diabolism in more than one country of Europe, some attempt at the present day to communicate formally with the Powers of Darkness, it must be said that this attempt returns in its old likeness and not invested with the sublimities and terrors of the modern view.
Parisian Diabolism, for example, in so far as it may be admitted to exist, is the Black Magic of the Grimoire and not the sovereign horror of the Brothers of the Left Hand Path, wearing their iniquity like an aureole, and deathless in spiritual evil.
These enigmatical personages are, however, the creation of romance, as are also their exalted, or at least purified, confrères .
Between Rosicrucian initiates of astral processes and the amatores diaboli there is indubitably the bond of union which arises from one fact: il n'y a pas des gens plus embêtants que ces gens-là .
Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.
The passage explicitly discusses the distinction between White and Black Magic, and the modern occultist division into Brothers of the Right and Left representing transcendental good and evil.
Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.
The text references 'secret traditional knowledge behind the written word of Magic' and an 'unmanifested science' believed to exist behind all science.
Sacred knowledge transmitted as living speech rather than fixed writing — scripture carried in memory, song, and telling, renewed in each generation; the unwritten canon of a tradition.
The text contrasts written literature with 'secret traditional knowledge behind the written word', implying an unwritten or oral transmission of true magic.
Critique of outward religious observance that lacks inner transformation; form without substance.
Waite critiques the 'garbled' nature of ceremonial literature and dismisses the romanticized figures of modern occultism as creations of romance rather than reality.
The grimoire-tradition practice of ceremonially commanding or binding a spirit through consecrated seals, circles, divine names, and prescribed instruments, compelling its appearance and obedience. Distinct from theurgy in the direction of the power relationship — theurgy is reverent engagement with the gods on the premise of the operator's own ascent, this is subordination of a lesser spirit to the operator's will — and from word_power_incantation and sacred_names, which name components (verbal force, name-power) this practice deploys rather than the ritual structure itself.
The passage mentions 'Goëtic Rituals' and communicating with 'Powers of Darkness', which implies the practice of conjuring spirits, though it critiques the modern romanticization of such adepts.