(This is the Cosmical Aditi and Sephira.) 5.
Those waters at the beginning were ordained but -- 6.
A tree had not grown, a flower had not unfolded.
7.
When the gods had not sprung up, any one of them.
8.
A plant had not grown, and order did not exist.
This was the chaotic or ante-genetic period -- the double Swan and the Dark Swan, which becomes white, when Light is created.* The symbol chosen for the majestic ideal of the Universal Principle will seem little calculated to answer its sacred character.
A goose, or even a swan, may appear unfit, no doubt, to represent the grandeur of the Spirit.
Nevertheless, it must have had some deep occult meaning, since it figures not only in every cosmogony and world religion, but even was chosen by the mediaeval Christians, the Crusaders, as the vehicle of the Holy Ghost supposed to lead the army to Palestine, to wrench the Tomb of the Saviour from the hands of the Saracen.
If we are to credit Professor Draper's statement in his "Intellectual Development of Europe," the Crusaders, led on by Peter the Hermit, were preceded, at the head of the army, by the Holy Ghost under the shape of a white gander in company of a goat.
The Egyptian God of Time, Seb, carries a goose on his head.
Jupiter assumes the form of a swan and Brahma also, because the root of all this is that mystery of mysteries -- the M UNDANE E GG.
(See preceding §).
[[Footnote(s)]] ------------------------------------------------- * The Seven Swans that are believed to land from Heaven into Lake Mansarovara, are in the popular fancy the Seven Rishis of the Great Bear, who assume that form to visit the locality where the Vedas were written.
[[Vol.
1, Page]] 358 THE SECRET DOCTRINE.
One has to learn the reason of a symbol before one depreciates it.
The dual element of Air and Water is that of the ibis, swan, goose and pelican, of crocodiles and frogs, lotus flowers and water lilies, &c.; and the result is the choice of the most unseemly symbols among the modern as much as the ancient mystics.
Pan, the great god of nature, was generally figured in connection with aquatic birds, geese especially, and so were other gods.
If, later on, with the gradual degeneration of religion, the gods to whom geese were sacred, became Priapic deities, it does not stand to reason that water fowls were made sacred to Pan and other Phallic deities as some scoffers even of antiquity would have it ( see Petronii Satyrica , cxxxvi.); but that the abstract and divine power of procreative nature had become grossly anthropomorphized.
Nor does the Swan of Leda show "Priapic doings and her enjoyment thereof," as Mr.
Hargrave Jennings chastely expresses it -- for the myth is but another version of the same philosophical idea of cosmogony.
Swans are frequently found associated with Apollo, as they are the emblems of water and fire (sun-light also), before the separation of the Elements.
Our modern symbologists might profit by some remarks made by a well-known writer, Mrs.
Lydia Maria Child.
"From time immemorial an emblem has been worshipped in Hindostan as the type of creation, or the origin of life.
.
.
.
Siva or the Mahadeva being not only the reproducer of human forms, but also the fructifying principle, the generative power that pervades the Universe.
The maternal emblem is likewise a religious type.
This reverence for the production of life, introduced into the worship of Osiris the sexual emblems.
Is it strange that they regarded with reverence the great mystery of human birth?
Were they impure thus to regard it?
Or are we impure that do not so regard it?
But no clean and thoughtful mind could so regard them.
.
.
.
We have travelled far, and unclean have been the paths, since those old Anchorites first spoke of God and the soul in the solemn depths of their first sanctuaries.
Let us not smile at their mode of tracing the infinite and the incomprehensible Cause throughout all the mysteries of nature, lest by so doing we cast the shadow of our own grossness on their patriarchal simplicity." (" Progress of Religious Ideas ," Vol.
1, p.
17, et seq.
) -------------- Next Chapter Contents
Attributing human characteristics, emotions, or form to the divine; embodied divine imagery.
The passage explicitly states that 'the abstract and divine power of procreative nature had become grossly anthropomorphized' and discusses how gods with sacred geese became Priapic deities through this process.
The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.
The swan/goose symbol is shown to recur across Egyptian, Greek, Hindu, and Christian traditions as the same underlying cosmogonic idea, mapping one level of meaning onto another.
Narratives or doctrines of cosmic origin — how heaven, earth, and the primordial deities first came into being. The Kojiki's deities born alone on the Plain of High Heaven, Voluspo's Ginnungagap, Genesis's tohu wa-bohu, the Timaeus's Demiurge fashioning the Receptacle, the Hesiodic Theogony, the Kalevala's egg-cosmogony, Egyptian Nun-and-Atum. Distinct from emanation_hierarchy (structural-ontological cascade), letters_of_creation (mechanism of creation), and apocatastasis/frashokereti (end-state restoration); cosmogony is temporally-narrative beginning.
The passage is centrally devoted to describing the pre-creation state (waters, no tree, no gods, no order), the 'MUNDANE EGG' as the mystery of mysteries, and the emergence of the cosmos from the 'chaotic or ante-genetic period.'
Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.
The passage insists the swan symbol 'must have had some deep occult meaning' and that 'one has to learn the reason of a symbol before one depreciates it,' asserting a concealed inner truth beneath the apparent unseemliness of the symbol.